지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In a traditional period, It has already been existed the recognition of the territorial waters which is not created in a modern period. Traditionally, the term expressing both “open seas” and “territorial seas” was “outside seas”(外洋) and “inside seas”. “outside seas”(外洋) was space prohibiting entry, which existed to the boundary ouside in nations. On the contrary, inside seas was recognized that inner a boundary to concept like the territorial sea. It meas that a border was existing to the sea as there is a border to the land. The borderline was just the horizon coming to Signal fire-millitary visual field. Therefore, the inside seas was a space including distance from Signal-fire to horizon which was recognized to the territorial seas in Late Joseaon period.
We cannot say that the range of inside seas was not fixed since the distance from coast to horizon was changed as the height of Signal-Fire, however, according to the calculation, the 40-50km from the coast was inside seas. In the respect of a sea boundary, Maritime Trade Proscription is the law which prohibits not only the horizon but also over the outside seas. It did not mean to forbid people to approach a sea itself. There are two things about the marine pass prohibition in the Joseon period. One is that prohibit to go outside over horizon of the sea and the other is that prohibit to trade centraband goods within the domestic sea-boundary.
Maritime Trade Proscription is the opposite concept to Marin Inerchange. In a traditional period, the weaker both Marine Defence Power and Maritime Trade Proscription were, the more the Marin Inerchange was active, on the contrary, the stronger both Marine Defence Power and Maritime Trade Proscription were, the weaker Marin Inerchange was.
We cannot say that the range of inside seas was not fixed since the distance from coast to horizon was changed as the height of Signal-Fire, however, according to the calculation, the 40-50km from the coast was inside seas. In the respect of a sea boundary, Maritime Trade Proscription is the law which prohibits not only the horizon but also over the outside seas. It did not mean to forbid people to approach a sea itself. There are two things about the marine pass prohibition in the Joseon period. One is that prohibit to go outside over horizon of the sea and the other is that prohibit to trade centraband goods within the domestic sea-boundary.
Maritime Trade Proscription is the opposite concept to Marin Inerchange. In a traditional period, the weaker both Marine Defence Power and Maritime Trade Proscription were, the more the Marin Inerchange was active, on the contrary, the stronger both Marine Defence Power and Maritime Trade Proscription were, the weaker Marin Inerchange was.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 水宗과 해양경계
3. 봉수대에서 水宗까지의 거리
4. 海禁의 개념
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
근대중국 해양관련 개념의 형성과 바다 이미지의 변화
동북아 문화연구
2011 .12
-
Extension of the Territorial Sea and Resources of the High Seas
저스티스
1978 .09
-
해양문학과 기행담론
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2008 .11
-
한국 영해제도의 역사와 문제에 대한 고찰
강원법학
2010 .10
-
Marine (sea) Familiarity Index and Its Influence to National Image
East Asian Journal of Business Economics
2019 .01
-
Marine (sea) Familiarity Index and Its Influence to National Image
East Asian Journal of Business Economics
2019 .01
-
전략환경평가 사후관리 해외 사례 분석
환경영향평가
2015 .01
-
온라인 공간상의 동해 지명 표기에 관한 연구
응용지리
2009 .12
-
China’s Position on the Territorial Sea Regime in Terms of the South China Sea Disputes: Straight Baselines and Innocent Passage of Warships around Disputed Islands
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2018 .01
-
Reasonable Restrictions on Freedom of High Seas by “Marine Protected Areas on the High Seas”: An Empirical Research
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
2019 .01
-
SEA + INNOVATION
한국호텔외식경영학회 학술발표논문집
2014 .12
-
대한민국 동해의 국제표준 명칭에 대한 발전적 대안 모색
한국도시지리학회지
2015 .01
-
The value of research on Deep Sea Water
한국체육교육학회 학술발표대회
2010 .11
-
Sea, Connecting the Dots: On the Cusp of Greatness
Academy of Asian Business Review
2019 .01
-
중국 내 ‘해권(海權)’에 관한 담론 연구
아세아연구
2019 .06
-
The Use of the Oceans and The Law of the Sea
저스티스
1973 .12
-
20세기 초 해권론의 수용과 중국 국민국가 - 손중산(孫中山)의 인식 사례를 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2020 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-910-001658824