메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역학회 무역학회지 貿易學會誌 第29卷 第3號
발행연도
2004.6
수록면
81 - 100 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper examines the comparison between the EU unilateral trade measure NCPI and TBR, and the case study of TBR's application against Korea. The TBR, which is replaced by the previous EC unilateral trade measure NCPI in 1995, has introduced important changes in the EU against unfair trade practices. The Regulation applies to both goods and trans-frontier services not involving the movement of persons. It provides a mechanism for Community firms and industries to act against trade barriers affecting their access to third country markets or the EU market, by requesting the Commission to investigate complaints and to seek redress-whether by negotiated bilateral agreement, dispute settlement at the WTO, or retaliatory measures.
In the case of Korea, three TBR examination procedures have been initiated. (i.e. cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and shipbuilding industries) The EU complains about injury suffered by Community industry resulting from subsidies conferred by Korea to its shipping industry, and claims that alleged trade barriers have caused significant price undercutting, price depression and lost sales by Community enterprises. Korea also counters unfair Community's shipbuilding supports and subsidy.
In the context of this conflict, the Commission in 2002 and Korea in 2003 decided to resort to a WTO dispute settlement procedure. Now solution can be sought through the WTO dispute settlement proceedings unless amicable solutions are agreed throughout the process. We can find that the TBR is the Community's commercial policy instruments but is unique in that it is offensive rather than defensive.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. NCPI와 TBR의 비교
Ⅲ. TBR 한국 제소 사례연구(Case Study): 한국-EU 조선분쟁
Ⅳ. 한국측의 대응 및 시사점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002891612