지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Though Korea's Constitutional Law guarantees the 'right to work' in article 32 section 1, two opinions still confront each other: does this 'right' include full-time workers' (i.e., insiders) 'right to maintain employment'; or does this right 'guarantee employment opportunities' for the unemployed, underemployed, and non full-time workers (i.e., outsiders). If the former has a legal basis in the 'right to work' as stipulated in Constitutional Law, then a problem appears: which 'right' holds priority, the former or the latter? It is here that these two collide. If the former has such a legal basis, it harms fair competition in the labor market because it could bring about an 'employment monopoly' for full-time workers as the two groups compete with each other in the labor market.
Nowadays, labor law must escape from the attitude and traditional function that it has to be regulated by the labor-management relationship in the company. In the labor market, all the workers must compete fairly. The labor law has to be reborn 'in order to maintain the rule of the labor market'--completely equal competition between labor and management.
For this, labor law must reform. Within the Constitutional Law, article 32, section 3, and article 33, section 1 mainly regulates 'labor-management relationship' ('principle of protection'), and article 32, section 1, the 'right to work'--a new addition--mainly regulates the 'labor-labor relationship' (the principle of competition). First, labor law is too strict, so it requires limited flexibility. It requires a broad correction of mainly the collision between insiders' and outsiders' intrest. Second, it must give chances for competition to the outsiders who are non full-time workers or unemployed. It also must guarantee the right to organize and join a labor union so as to improve themselves and their low position through the power of unity as a group.
In the future, we must find harmony between the insiders' right (labor-management regulation) based on the 'principle of protection', and the outsiders' right (labor-labor regulation) based on the basis of the 'principle of competition', while at the same time it could require a foundational change to the paradigm of labor law. Thus we must check full-time workers' (insiders') labor market monopoly and special right, and extend opportunities for employment to non full-time workers and the unemployed (outsiders). That is the short way to solve the social inequality in our society, the gap between the wealthy and the poor, and income disparity.
Nowadays, labor law must escape from the attitude and traditional function that it has to be regulated by the labor-management relationship in the company. In the labor market, all the workers must compete fairly. The labor law has to be reborn 'in order to maintain the rule of the labor market'--completely equal competition between labor and management.
For this, labor law must reform. Within the Constitutional Law, article 32, section 3, and article 33, section 1 mainly regulates 'labor-management relationship' ('principle of protection'), and article 32, section 1, the 'right to work'--a new addition--mainly regulates the 'labor-labor relationship' (the principle of competition). First, labor law is too strict, so it requires limited flexibility. It requires a broad correction of mainly the collision between insiders' and outsiders' intrest. Second, it must give chances for competition to the outsiders who are non full-time workers or unemployed. It also must guarantee the right to organize and join a labor union so as to improve themselves and their low position through the power of unity as a group.
In the future, we must find harmony between the insiders' right (labor-management regulation) based on the 'principle of protection', and the outsiders' right (labor-labor regulation) based on the basis of the 'principle of competition', while at the same time it could require a foundational change to the paradigm of labor law. Thus we must check full-time workers' (insiders') labor market monopoly and special right, and extend opportunities for employment to non full-time workers and the unemployed (outsiders). That is the short way to solve the social inequality in our society, the gap between the wealthy and the poor, and income disparity.
목차
[Abstract]
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 노동권 보장의 의의
Ⅲ. 종속노동이론 비판
Ⅳ. 노동권 보장과 비정규근로자 보호
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
노동권의 현대적 재해석과 고용보장법
노동법논총
2004 .02
-
연소근로자와 여성근로자의 보호에 관한 법적 규율
서강법학
2008 .06
-
개정 고용허가제의 문제점과 개선방안 : 2009년 10월 9일 개정법률을 중심으로
노동법논총
2010 .04
-
기간제법상 단시간 근로자 보호에 대한 재검토
노동법논총
2017 .04
-
Changing Industrial Relations and Labor Market Inequality in Post-Crisis Korea
Journal of Asian Sociology
2015 .12
-
외국인근로자의 헌법상 근로권보장과 고용허가제의 쟁점사항
한양법학
2015 .11
-
노동조합법상 근로자 개념 확대와 그 후속문제에 대한 단상
노동법학
2019 .12
-
고용형태 다양화의 요인과 실태
기업법연구
2003 .03
-
글로벌 경제하에서의 노동시장, 고용보호와 노동법
노동법학
2005 .12
-
외국인근로자의 사업장변경 실태와 문제점 및 법적개선방안
노동법논총
2011 .12
-
[특집/민주주의하에서 보호받지 못하는 노동/파견직, 여성 그리고 촉탁직 노동자]이중의 고용 -파견노동과 사내하청 노동
아세아연구
2004 .09
-
노동시장정책과 쟁점 검토
노동법논총
2015 .08
-
고용보험제도의 운영상 문제점과 개선방안
기업법연구
2003 .12
-
시용근로관계에 대한 연구
강원법학
2011 .06
-
보험설계사의 노동법상 쟁점과 과제
노동법논총
2019 .12
-
외국인근로자 고용에 있어서의 법적·정책적 쟁점
노동법학
2019 .06
-
고용환경의 변화, 노동법의 위기와 대응 : 노동보호법의 인적 적용범위를 중심으로
노동법학
2018 .09
-
중국 비전일제고용의 법률규제에 관한 연구
노동법논총
2014 .12
-
근무성적 불량자에 대한 노동법의 대응
노동법학
2009 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-336-003123553