메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이재훈 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
호서사학회 역사와 담론 역사와 담론 第56輯
발행연도
2010.8
수록면
509 - 533 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The nature of economical relationship between Korea and Russia in the period of Korea royal refuge at the Russian legation~Russo-Japanese War is as follows.
Firstly, bilateral pure economical relationship has converted to imperialistic relationship under the influence of political relationship. In short, Local vs. regional level bilateral economic relations are characterized by only the physical trade, unlike the previous season in the central-to-center dimension of Russian political and military strategy for this expansion and Korea, and Japan's response is dependent on the political relations established on the side was.
Secondly, Manchuria huge booty acquired from Russia and the Russia for an extension of imperialist powers, including Japan, due to containment of the imperial economic ties to South Korea if the self-control and inhibition, but it was trying to take over Russia in Manchuria and Korea maintain the status quo that will conflict with Japan's expansion could not be in the destiny.
Russia's Claim of deforestation in the Yalu River was bilateral economic relationship such that it clearly shows the characteristics of a good case. In other words when Yu. I. Brynner acquired from the Korean government Claim of deforestation in the Yalu River Russia approached on the principle of economic feasibility. But when Russia occupied Port Arthur Korea has been excluded from the policy lines of the Russia. And Brynner's business was also pushed the importance and led to the loss.
But since then Brynner's business has converted to strategical utilize. Because his business area was the boundary of Korea and Manchuria, by Russia the place had been expected to ensure the safety of Japan's aggressive military strategy to alleviate 'buffer zone' and 'forward bases' role.

목차

1. 문제제기
2. 브린너의 삼림채벌권 획득과 러시아의 경제적 침투정책
3. 삼림채벌권의 군사전략적 활용 시도와 좌절
4. 끝말
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002713738