지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.6
- 수록면
- 419 - 466 (48page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, several cases on the Corporate Opportunity Doctrine (hereinafter COD) have been reported by a non-governmental organization (hereinafter NGO) in Korea. However, there are several problems to settle the COD in Korea because the Korea Commercial Code (hereinafter KCC) does note have any provision on the COD except for the several provisions on the fiduciary duty including duty and loyalty of care. In this sense, the provisions for the COD in the KCC need to be adopted in the very near future as follows:
There are some applicable standards for the COD such as the interest or expectancy test, the line of business test, the fairness test and two-step test in the United States. In particular, even though the line of business test is the leading test for the COD, it has several draw backs (e.g., vagueness of the scope of business). As a result, the author reviews the applicable standards for the COD and alleges that there is the need to update the applicable standards in order to apply to the COD properly for the Korean legal system.
These applicable standards for the COD are based on the defenses such as the disclosure & fairness defenses, and the consent or authorization defenses. The author examines several debated defenses rested on some leading cases and articles released in the United States and also tries to apply the results of the examination to the Korean legal system in the future. As a result, the disclosure defense, the consent defense, the corporation’s non-financial capacity defense, the non-legal capacity defense, the special agreement defense, and the non-line of business defense are of useful to the applicable standards for the COD in the Korean legal system. On the other hand, the fairness defense and the authorization defense will be allowed as defenses of the applicable standards for the COD only when the fairness in the causes of the delayed disclosure to the corporation concerned exists. However, the individual capacity defense and the non-interest or non-expectancy defense are not allowed as defenses of the applicable standards for the COD because there is in danger to be faked in the former and the latter is examined in the non-line of business defense.
Therefore, there is the need to be continued to examine cases and articles on the COD focused on both the applicable standards and defenses for the Korean legal system in the near future.
There are some applicable standards for the COD such as the interest or expectancy test, the line of business test, the fairness test and two-step test in the United States. In particular, even though the line of business test is the leading test for the COD, it has several draw backs (e.g., vagueness of the scope of business). As a result, the author reviews the applicable standards for the COD and alleges that there is the need to update the applicable standards in order to apply to the COD properly for the Korean legal system.
These applicable standards for the COD are based on the defenses such as the disclosure & fairness defenses, and the consent or authorization defenses. The author examines several debated defenses rested on some leading cases and articles released in the United States and also tries to apply the results of the examination to the Korean legal system in the future. As a result, the disclosure defense, the consent defense, the corporation’s non-financial capacity defense, the non-legal capacity defense, the special agreement defense, and the non-line of business defense are of useful to the applicable standards for the COD in the Korean legal system. On the other hand, the fairness defense and the authorization defense will be allowed as defenses of the applicable standards for the COD only when the fairness in the causes of the delayed disclosure to the corporation concerned exists. However, the individual capacity defense and the non-interest or non-expectancy defense are not allowed as defenses of the applicable standards for the COD because there is in danger to be faked in the former and the latter is examined in the non-line of business defense.
Therefore, there is the need to be continued to examine cases and articles on the COD focused on both the applicable standards and defenses for the Korean legal system in the near future.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 회사기회유용이론의 적용기준
Ⅲ. 회사기회유용이론의 항변사유
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
더피 사건 : 회사기회유용이론의 정당성 기준
기업법연구
2006 .09
-
회사기회유용금지의 법리 : 미국 법원들의 중요 고려요건과 그 적용가능성
기업법연구
2007 .09
-
적대적 M&A와 그 방어책에 관한 연구 — 주식관련 포이즌 필의 도입과 관련하여 —
법과 정책연구
2008 .01
-
이른바 ‘절도범 뇌사 사건’ 판결에 비추어 본정당방위⋅과잉방위에 관한 비판적 고찰-대법원 2016. 5. 12. 선고 2016도2794 판결(원심 판결: 서울고등법원 2016. 1. 29. 선고 2015노11 판결)-
일감법학
2018 .01
-
18세기 조선의 육·해방론 전개
군사
2017 .09
-
적대적 기업매수에 대한 방어행위의 법리
한양법학
2007 .02
-
방위산업과 군사력 건설
한국동북아논총
2006 .09
-
‘민간인 중심 지역방위체계’ 형성을 위한 당(중앙) 군사위원회 활동
현대북한연구
2009 .12
-
적대적 M&A와 이사회기능
기업법연구
2009 .06
-
자주국방 발전기의 국방정책과 제도, 1998~2000
군사
2008 .08
-
회사기회 이론
기업법연구
2008 .09
-
개정상법상 회사기회유용금지규정의 검토
한양법학
2011 .05
-
The Defense Expenditure and Military Aspect in War Time
법학연구
2004 .12
-
방위산업의 시장구조 결정요인이 기술혁신과 시장지배에 미치는 영향
군사학연구
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
회사기회유용 관련 재계측 시각의 허구성 : 최근 발간된 한국경제연구원 보고서를 중심으로
이지수
,
강정민
이슈&분석
2011
.03
2012년 19대 정기국회 개혁입법과제 5 회사기회유용 및 일감몰아주기 규제강화 방안
채이배
,
이지수
기업지배구조연구
2012
.09
회사기회유용법리를 지나치게 좁게 해석한 법원 판결의 문제점 및 비판 : 현대자동차 1 심 판결을 중심으로
이지수
경제개혁이슈
2011
.06
개정상법상 회사기회유용금지규정의 검토
박선종
한양법학
2011
.05
회사기회유용금지의 법리 : 미국 법원들의 중요 고려요건과 그 적용가능성
김원기
,
박선종
기업법연구
2007
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001271570