지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Not as a prior question concerning the revoke of the administrative actions based on the administrative decrees of regulations(hereafter ‘decrees’), but rather permitting an administrative litigation directly requesting the revoke of confirmation of the invalidity of the decrees, thus endowing jurisdiction on such a matter to the ordinary court can be faced with the doubt on the constitutionality under the present Constitution
Contentions that decrees could directly be the object of the administrative litigation because they are essentially administrative act are simple and clear, and can be positively evaluated if you put weight on the integration of the administrative jurisdiction But decrees and individual administrative actions are essentially different in their substantial functions, although they belong to administrative power alike Integration of constitutional review should be as highly appreciated as the integration of the administrative jurisdiction
Provided the ordinary court has the jurisdiction over the original review against the decrees, complete separation as of ‘judicial review against the statute to the Constitutional Court, judicial review against the decrees to the ordinary court’ should lead to the failure in achieving the integration of the judicial review
Original review against the decrees does not necessarily require trial over facts, appeal institution which ascribe to the strength of the ordinary court, on the contrary need for uniformity in the interpretation of law requires single judgement without appeal Henceforth a suggestion to put jurisdiction over administrative litigation against the decrees in the Supreme Court just means to alter the judging court(from the Constitutional Court to the Supreme Court) The reason for such an alteration has not been suggested so far In consideration of specialty, experience of the Constitutional Court, overburden of the Supreme Court, it would be desirable that the Constitutional Court continuously takes charge of the original review against the decrees ensuring the people’s right and optimizing the state’s function
Contentions that decrees could directly be the object of the administrative litigation because they are essentially administrative act are simple and clear, and can be positively evaluated if you put weight on the integration of the administrative jurisdiction But decrees and individual administrative actions are essentially different in their substantial functions, although they belong to administrative power alike Integration of constitutional review should be as highly appreciated as the integration of the administrative jurisdiction
Provided the ordinary court has the jurisdiction over the original review against the decrees, complete separation as of ‘judicial review against the statute to the Constitutional Court, judicial review against the decrees to the ordinary court’ should lead to the failure in achieving the integration of the judicial review
Original review against the decrees does not necessarily require trial over facts, appeal institution which ascribe to the strength of the ordinary court, on the contrary need for uniformity in the interpretation of law requires single judgement without appeal Henceforth a suggestion to put jurisdiction over administrative litigation against the decrees in the Supreme Court just means to alter the judging court(from the Constitutional Court to the Supreme Court) The reason for such an alteration has not been suggested so far In consideration of specialty, experience of the Constitutional Court, overburden of the Supreme Court, it would be desirable that the Constitutional Court continuously takes charge of the original review against the decrees ensuring the people’s right and optimizing the state’s function
목차
Ⅰ. 問題의 提起
Ⅱ. 行政統制에 대한 憲法的 權限 分配
Ⅲ. 關聯 問題들
Ⅳ. 綜合
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
行政立法 效力의 再構成 - 試論
행정법연구
2009 .12
-
행정법상 선결문제와 헌법 제107조 제2항에서의 '처분' 및 '재판의 전제'와의 관계
행정법연구
2009 .12
-
國際聯合行政上의 諸問題
국제법학회논총
1960 .04
-
동아시아 행정심판제도 비교연구
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
中国2014年《行政诉讼法》修正案的主要内容及未来发展
동북아법연구
2015 .01
-
무역위원회의 판정에 대한 사법심사 가능성 소고 : 서울행정법원 2007. 8. 14. 선고 2007구합825 판결
행정법연구
2007 .08
-
행정소송에서의 원고적격 : 법원의 조사방법을 중심으로
행정법연구
2009 .12
-
규범통제의 본질에 비추어 본 대법원과 헌법재판소의 역할
고려법학
2009 .01
-
프랑스, 미국에서의 행정행위 개념에 대한 소고
행정법연구
2007 .12
-
행정의 행위형식으로서의‘행정계획’개념에 대한 검토－헌법재판소 2000. 6. 1. 선고, 99헌마538등 결정,대법원 1982. 3. 9. 선고, 80누105 판결 및 대법원 2002.10. 11. 선고, 2000두8226 판결에 대한 평석－
일감법학
2013 .01
-
글로벌 시대의 公益論
행정법연구
2007 .12
-
中國法院의 管轄 : 행정소송법을 중심으로
행정법연구
2006 .10
-
중국법상 行政審判機關의 終局裁決權과 그에 대한 評價
법학연구
2005 .12
-
행정소송에서의 기본적 사실관계 동일성의 의의 : 형사소송과의 비교를 중심으로
행정법연구
2016 .08
-
헌법재판소법의 문제점과 개선방안
공법학연구
2005 .02
-
행정지도와 법률유보 및 구제에 관한 이론적 검토
한양법학
2011 .08
-
2017년 행정법(I) 중요 판례
인권과 정의
2018 .01
-
행정소송에서의 원고적격 : 기존 4개 학설의 의의를 중심으로
행정법연구
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0