지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The origin of “Informed Consent” began from reflection to the past history of the Second World War. : It is killing innocent human life, his or her consent, let alone without any restriction, human experimentation has been carried out. However, rapid growth of development and medical technology of science and technology, it becomes possible to provide medical services to many patients, due to the expansion of the provision of a variety of medical services, rapidly discussion of “Informed Consent” of the modern It flourished in.
Today, doctors and patients, is an equal relationship on the medical contract. Medical contract is simply difficult ending at once, since it is usually continued, the physician by the “medical contract on the application of the” through the Informed Consent, patients, some of the problems (judgment of the person, such as economic strength) is thought, accept the application thereof (hospitalized Subsequently hospital or consent of surgery), or abandoned (admitted to other hospitals), it is possible to define a contract to select a discontinuation of treatment.
For the expansion of the development and healthcare providers of modern medicine, medical-related lawsuits, while rapidly increased, the patient, it is difficult to determine the cause of the conflict occurred. The patient, for the lack of medical expertise, it is difficult to prove. In addition, some medical experts have “conspiracy of silence”, “medical paternalism” it is difficult to dispute resolution medical litigation for, is difficult right relief of patients.
Medical dispute on civil is, the “Violation of the Informed Consent” of the duty of care violation on the doctor’s practice is to “negligence on the medical care” which becomes the reference for infringement of a patient’s right to self-determination, and the issue to.
In our case, Informed Consent has not been codified directly, but was seen through the theory and precedent. However, if it is not a codification, without certain criteria, differences in the interpretation of individual cases are diverse. Therefore, inconsistent even Scope of the Compensation for Damages, which can be to be the most important in civil action, inconsistent in doctrine interpreted and missing many rights remedies patient is a relative weak medical disputes. The first method is intended to be assembled as a “medical contract” the “Informed Consent” Specifically, second is to establish a new legal status of the “Informed Consent”. And it believes to be able to find the right way by the right remedy of the patient and to be viewed expand logical as follows.
Today, doctors and patients, is an equal relationship on the medical contract. Medical contract is simply difficult ending at once, since it is usually continued, the physician by the “medical contract on the application of the” through the Informed Consent, patients, some of the problems (judgment of the person, such as economic strength) is thought, accept the application thereof (hospitalized Subsequently hospital or consent of surgery), or abandoned (admitted to other hospitals), it is possible to define a contract to select a discontinuation of treatment.
For the expansion of the development and healthcare providers of modern medicine, medical-related lawsuits, while rapidly increased, the patient, it is difficult to determine the cause of the conflict occurred. The patient, for the lack of medical expertise, it is difficult to prove. In addition, some medical experts have “conspiracy of silence”, “medical paternalism” it is difficult to dispute resolution medical litigation for, is difficult right relief of patients.
Medical dispute on civil is, the “Violation of the Informed Consent” of the duty of care violation on the doctor’s practice is to “negligence on the medical care” which becomes the reference for infringement of a patient’s right to self-determination, and the issue to.
In our case, Informed Consent has not been codified directly, but was seen through the theory and precedent. However, if it is not a codification, without certain criteria, differences in the interpretation of individual cases are diverse. Therefore, inconsistent even Scope of the Compensation for Damages, which can be to be the most important in civil action, inconsistent in doctrine interpreted and missing many rights remedies patient is a relative weak medical disputes. The first method is intended to be assembled as a “medical contract” the “Informed Consent” Specifically, second is to establish a new legal status of the “Informed Consent”. And it believes to be able to find the right way by the right remedy of the patient and to be viewed expand logical as follows.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 의료계약에 대한 재검토
Ⅲ. 일반 부수의무와의 구별
Ⅳ. 주된 급부의무로서의 의사의 설명의무
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
개정 의료법상 설명의무에 관한 비판적 고찰
의료법학
2017 .01
-
의료소송과 실질적인 환자의 권리보호에 관한 소고 : ‘의사의 설명의무 위반’사례를 중심으로
한양법학
2016 .05
-
의사의 설명의무위반과 손해배상
법학연구
2016 .05
-
수술환자의 권리보호에 대한 형사법적 쟁점 - 환자의 자기결정권을 중심으로 -
의료법학
2015 .01
-
수의사의 설명의무에 관한 연구 -이론적 근거, 손해배상의 범위를 중심으로-
저스티스
2023 .08
-
환자의 모를 권리와 의사의 배려의무
의료법학
2016 .01
-
치료행위의 헌법적 정당성과 위법성조각의 형법적 근거
법과 정책연구
2020 .01
-
의료사망사고에 대한 과실치사죄 성부에 관한 비교법적 연구
한양법학
2024 .02
-
인지된 동의가 소비자의 개인정보 제공의도와 위치기반 모바일 커머스 지속이용의도에 미치는 효과: 20대, 30대 소비자를 중심으로
소비자정책교육연구
2016 .01
-
의료행위에 있어서 의사의 설명의무와 미성년자의 동의능력 판단기준 — 대법원 2023.3.9.선고 2020다218925 판결을 중심으로 —
과학기술과 법
2024 .06
-
이카루스의 꿈: 충분한 설명에 근거한 동의는 실체적인가?
법학논총
2021 .12
-
국내 온라인 상담 플랫폼의 고지된 동의(informed consent) 현황 및 개선방안
한국진로교육학회 학술대회지
2022 .11
-
동의의 본질과 구조 -자기결정의 자유-
법철학연구
2017 .12
-
수혈거부 환자에 대한 의사의 책임
고려법학
2015 .01
-
의료사고의 책임 분배 제도에 대한 고찰 — 의료사고처리특례법안과 외국의 법제에 관한 비교를 중심으로 —
과학기술과 법
2024 .06
-
인간대상연구에서 서면동의 면제에 관한 고찰
법과 정책연구
2024 .03
-
환자의 자기결정권 확보방안
의생명과학과법
2015 .01
-
International Tourists" Perception on Domestic Medical Tourism and Services
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2023 .12
-
의사의 설명의무에서 ‘환자의 숙고할 시간’의 형식적․실질적 의미 - 대법원 2022. 1. 27. 선고 2021다265010 판결 중심으로 -
재산법연구
2022 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-001757133