메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이익주 (서울시립대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第227輯
발행연도
2015.9
수록면
3 - 22 (20page)
DOI
10.16912/tkhr.2015.09.227.3

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper introduces the trend at the academia of Korean History in 2014 and overviews the research outcomes from 2013 to 2014 on pre-modern history of Korea. This paper also proposes alternative solutions for problems created by a mass quantitative increase in academic papers, which is one of the main issues at the academia.
Korean history textbooks and discussions about ‘history of East Asia’ have been the most important issues in the academia in 2014. For the issue of history textbooks, academic debates related to history education are demanded thus not to be distorted as a political issue.
In the future, while vigorous discussions not only among the researchers of eastern and western history, and also among pre-modern and modern-comtemporary history should be urged on the issues of East Asian history, the efforts of pre-historians are especially required.
After arranging research results from 2013 to 2014 based on chronological categories (ancient, Goryeo, early-Joseon, late-Joseon), it has been revealed that there are new approaches to replace the conventional opinions. This may imply that this is the right time to seek for new paradigm of studies of Korean history. However, such new attempts should hardly forsake the entire context of Korean history, and thus emphasizing a syntactic perspective is more than necessary.
Regarding the concerns about recent mass production of articles, I have counted the number of papers which were presented in 2013 and 2014 and the number of their presenters. As a result, most of researchers presented less than 1.5 papers in each year, and around 10% of them were publishing a larger volume of papers than usual. This paper encourages an alternative policy to create environments in which researchers can concentrate on publishing ‘qualitative papers’ while avoiding quantitative competition.

목차

I. 머리말
II. 2014년 한국사학계의 주요 동향
III. 2013-2014년 한국 전근대사 연구 동향
IV. 논문 量産에 대한 제언
V. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001941396