지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study sheds light on the activities of Joseon troops loyal to the King Injo(勤王軍), which gathered to rescue the King, from the local regions to the vicinity of the Namhansanseong Fortress(南漢山城). Preceding researches, which were based on the diplomatic views, have focused on the international relationship, the origin of war, and the political impact of the defeat. Meanwhile research which put emphasis on the military aspect has yet to be carried out, due to fact that Joseon was defeated at the war and due to the critical understanding that Joseon could not face the international situation with equanimity, while being in favor of the fidelity to the Ming dynasty. This led to the widespread recognition that Joseon government did not take military steps corresponding to the probable war, although it could have predicted the possibility of war.
The main stage of the Manchu’s invasion of Korea in 1636(丙子胡亂) was the Namhansanseong Fortress． Joseon Army could not check the advance of the Qing China(淸) at the northwestern region, resulting in the King Injo’s entering into the Namhansanseong Fortress．Being isolated, the King Injo had no choice but to wait the local army’s coming to rescue him. Therefore the war progressed with the two parties conflicting around the Namhansanseong Fortress: the Qing China’s army trying to encircle the King Injo and the Joseon army struggling to rescue the King. Thus it is necessary to comprehend the activities of Joseon troops loyal to the king in order to understand the Second Manchu invasion of Korea from the military perspective.
This article aims to examine the organization of Qing army and its route and analyze the strategy of Joseon to defend its northwestern region with regard to the reason the King Injo entered into the Namhansanseong Fortress. The activities of Joseon troops loyal to the king would be discussed to figure out the whole picture of the Joseon’s military strategy. This article would suggest that the local army of the Joseon during the war acted speedily, that their scale was quite large, and that the activities of the army were effective to some extent. This was the fruit of Joseon government’s struggle to devise the defense strategy toward the Later Jin(後金)／Qing China(淸) for a long time. It is true that Joseon tried to avail diplomatic measures to solve the conflict with the Qing China. Joseon government, however, did not solely depend upon the passive strategy, with no preparation for the war.
The main stage of the Manchu’s invasion of Korea in 1636(丙子胡亂) was the Namhansanseong Fortress． Joseon Army could not check the advance of the Qing China(淸) at the northwestern region, resulting in the King Injo’s entering into the Namhansanseong Fortress．Being isolated, the King Injo had no choice but to wait the local army’s coming to rescue him. Therefore the war progressed with the two parties conflicting around the Namhansanseong Fortress: the Qing China’s army trying to encircle the King Injo and the Joseon army struggling to rescue the King. Thus it is necessary to comprehend the activities of Joseon troops loyal to the king in order to understand the Second Manchu invasion of Korea from the military perspective.
This article aims to examine the organization of Qing army and its route and analyze the strategy of Joseon to defend its northwestern region with regard to the reason the King Injo entered into the Namhansanseong Fortress. The activities of Joseon troops loyal to the king would be discussed to figure out the whole picture of the Joseon’s military strategy. This article would suggest that the local army of the Joseon during the war acted speedily, that their scale was quite large, and that the activities of the army were effective to some extent. This was the fruit of Joseon government’s struggle to devise the defense strategy toward the Later Jin(後金)／Qing China(淸) for a long time. It is true that Joseon tried to avail diplomatic measures to solve the conflict with the Qing China. Joseon government, however, did not solely depend upon the passive strategy, with no preparation for the war.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 淸軍 편제와 진격로의 검토
Ⅲ. 조선의 방어전략과 남한산성
Ⅳ. 勤王軍의 활동과 그 의미
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (62)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
관찬 사료의 기사를 통해 본 조선후기 남한산성의 운영
기전문화연구
2023 .06
-
丙子胡亂 護聖守僕과 『鄭義士護聖錄』의 편찬 - 泮人을 구속하는 ‘辭免賤’ 이데올로기 -
漢文學報
2019 .01
-
《白鹿原》與《太白山脈》?事策略比??究-以人物形象和?事策略?中-
중국학논총
2020 .01
-
세계문화 유산이 된 남한산성을 다시 찾다 그 때 있었던 슬픈 이야기
한국여성신학
2016 .02
-
明淸交替 시기 朝中關係의 추이
동양사학연구
2017 .09
-
아직도 우리는 남한산성에 갇혀있는가
철학과 현실
2017 .12
-
한 武官의 전쟁 체험 手記가 만들어지기까지 「南漢手錄」의 서사 방식 연구
한민족문화연구
2015 .02
-
신라 上古期 대외 방어 전략의 변화와 于山國 征伐
신라사학보
2020 .12
-
병자호란의 종전과 평화로 가는 여정
역사학보
2025 .03
-
어느 한미한 사족의 倡義活動에 대한 기억과 그 추숭과정 - 金有富 가문의 『漁樵窩兩世三綱錄』과 古文書를 중심으로 -
국학연구론총
2019 .01
-
A Fortress Made in Heaven (Namhansanseong of Gwangju) and the City of a King’s Dreams (Hwaseong Fortress of Suwon)
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2021 .12
-
중국어 ‘胡(호)’의 의미와 구조 연구
중국언어연구
2021 .12
-
고구려의 대당방어체제(對唐防禦體制)와 645년 전쟁
동북아역사리포트
2023 .07
-
전란기 어느 무장의 투지와 항전(유승주, 2019, 『丙子胡亂前後 柳琳將軍의 將略과 金化大捷』, 도서출판 온샘)
한국사학보
2020 .11
-
자초한 전쟁이 아닌, 피할 수 없었던 전쟁 ― 병자호란의 성격과 역사적 의미에 대한 새로운 해석 [서평] 허태구(2019), 『병자호란과 예, 그리고 중화』, 소명출판, 387쪽.
인문논총
2019 .01
-
서귀(西歸) 이기발(李起浡)의 한시 연구: 의리 정신의 시적 형상화
공존의 인간학
2022 .07
-
병자호란 시기 강화도 함락 당시 조선군의 배치 상황과 청군의 전력
동양사학연구
2017 .12
-
허구서사에서 역사적 사건을 재현하는 방식에 내포된 인간관과 역사인식에 대한 비평적 고찰―소설 『남한산성』과 영화 [남한산성]에서의 아이러니와 타자에 대한 윤리를 중심으로
현대문학이론연구
2021 .12
-
조선전기 축성기술의 변천 연구
인문과학연구
2017 .03
-
丁卯·丙子胡亂 전후 主和·斥和論 관련 연구의 성과와 전망
사학연구
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-911-000865219