메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이태현 (경희대학교) 김예영 (대구한의대학교) 이만균 (경희대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제25권 제3호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2016.6
수록면
1,149 - 1,160 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study was designed to examine the effects of 6 weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) under relatively equal energy expenditure on body composition, blood lipid profiles, atherogenic index, and cardiovascular function in 20s overweight males. Thirty-two participants were randomized into one of the following three groups: HIIT group (n=11), MICT group(n=11), and control group(n=10). Subjects in HIIT group completed 6 weeks of training for 33 min/session, three sessions/wk, and subjects in MICT group exercised for 41 min/session to equalize the energy expenditure with HIIT group. Subjects in control group were asked to maintain their normal life pattern during the same intervention period. Data were analyzed using repeated two-way ANOVA. Main results of the present study were as follows: 1) Body weight, body mass index, fat mass, and percent body fat decreased significantly in HIIT group, and body weight, body mass index, and fat mass deceased significantly in MICT group. 2) Total cholesterol decreased significantly in HIIT group. 3) Atherogenic index were tended to improve in HIIT, but the changes failed to reach the statistically significant level. 4) Systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and RPP decreased significantly in HIIT group, and systolic blood pressure decreased significantly in MICT group. Results indicate that high-intensity interval training would be more beneficial for body composition, blood lipid profiles, atherogenic index, and cardiovascular function than moderate-intensity continuous training in overweight males.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-692-000836321