지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
EU member state mediation system could vary from country to country according to the differences of history, legal backgrounds and cultural traditions. In spite of these differences, EU directive (Directive 2008/52/EC) leads similar direction of improvements of EU mediation system.
2012 German Mediation Act transposes EU directive into the German law. But the scope of the German Mediation Act exceeds the requirements of the European Directive. German Mediation Act amended also German civil procedure.
Under French law, parties may refer a case to mediation in any area of law, in case the mediation does not undermine rules of public policy. The court could refer the case to the mediation with the consent of the parties. French mediation system looks like more similar to U.S. mediation system in contrast with German system. France judge could not act as a mediator or mediation judge.
It is called that Italy judge is not so enthusiastic to refer his pending case to the mediation. There are some barriers to the use of mediation in italy in spite of EU directive(Directive 2008/52/EC)’s leading role. Lawyers are divided between pros and cons on mediation’s role. Italy legislative Decree n.28 of 4th March 2010 and the Law n.69 of 2009 provide an obligation for all lawyers in writing advising their clients when mediation is suitable to their case.
A lot of contents of each EU country’s mediation act molded after EU mediation directive. This is maybe the most prominent characteristics of EU mediation system. It is also said that EU mediation system originates from U.S. mediation system which is each party oriented. That’s because the similar nature of EU and U.S.A. federation.
This kind of study on development of EU mediation system could also helpful to the reform of Korea mediation system. That’s because Korea Civil Mediation Act still regards mediation as a kind of adjudicative tools to lessen the burden of court’s heavy case loads.
2012 German Mediation Act transposes EU directive into the German law. But the scope of the German Mediation Act exceeds the requirements of the European Directive. German Mediation Act amended also German civil procedure.
Under French law, parties may refer a case to mediation in any area of law, in case the mediation does not undermine rules of public policy. The court could refer the case to the mediation with the consent of the parties. French mediation system looks like more similar to U.S. mediation system in contrast with German system. France judge could not act as a mediator or mediation judge.
It is called that Italy judge is not so enthusiastic to refer his pending case to the mediation. There are some barriers to the use of mediation in italy in spite of EU directive(Directive 2008/52/EC)’s leading role. Lawyers are divided between pros and cons on mediation’s role. Italy legislative Decree n.28 of 4th March 2010 and the Law n.69 of 2009 provide an obligation for all lawyers in writing advising their clients when mediation is suitable to their case.
A lot of contents of each EU country’s mediation act molded after EU mediation directive. This is maybe the most prominent characteristics of EU mediation system. It is also said that EU mediation system originates from U.S. mediation system which is each party oriented. That’s because the similar nature of EU and U.S.A. federation.
This kind of study on development of EU mediation system could also helpful to the reform of Korea mediation system. That’s because Korea Civil Mediation Act still regards mediation as a kind of adjudicative tools to lessen the burden of court’s heavy case loads.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 유럽연합조정지침과 조정제도의 발전
Ⅲ. 유럽 각국의 조정제도
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (9)
참고문헌 신청
법원행정처 / 2002 / 조정실무
Burkhard Hess / 2013 / Regulating dispute resolution, ADR and access to justice at the crossroads / Hart publishing
Burkhart Hess / 2014 / Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice Volume 31
Burkhart Hess / 2011 / Perspektiven der gerichtsinternen Mediation in Deutschland / ZZP(Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess) 124
Frédérique Ferrand / 2013 / Regulating Dispute Resolution: ADR and Access to Justice at the Crossroads / Hart publishing
Burkhard Hess / 2013 / Regulating dispute resolution, ADR and access to justice at the crossroads / Hart publishing
Burkhart Hess / 2014 / Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice Volume 31
Burkhart Hess / 2011 / Perspektiven der gerichtsinternen Mediation in Deutschland / ZZP(Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess) 124
Frédérique Ferrand / 2013 / Regulating Dispute Resolution: ADR and Access to Justice at the Crossroads / Hart publishing
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Mediation
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2018 .12
-
중국의 상사조정제도와 그 시사점에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2015 .05
-
공정거래분쟁조정법(안)의 입법적 함의와 실효성 제고를 위한 개선 방안
경쟁법연구
2024 .09
-
Understanding Indian Mediation: Comparison of Indian and Korean Mediation Programs
일감법학
2021 .08
-
의료기기분쟁과 분쟁조정제도— 독일의 법적 현황을 참고하여 —
안암법학
2021 .01
-
조정제도의 활성화를 위한 법경제학적 분석
동북아법연구
2020 .01
-
한국어 교육에서의 매개 활동 및 전략-CEFR의 매개(mediation)를 중심으로-
한국어 교육
2022 .06
-
제4차 산업혁명 시대에 있어서 우리나라 조정산업(調停産業, Mediation Industry)의 진흥을 위한 연구 : 미국의 사법중재 및 조정서비스(JAMS)와 미국 중재협회(AAA)를 중심으로
법학연구
2018 .08
-
회복적 사법을 위한 형사조정제도 개선 방향 연구
형사법의 신동향
2024 .06
-
행정형 조정의 현황과 과제
인권과 정의
2022 .06
-
민간형 조정제도 활성화에 관한 연구- 이태리의 ‘완화된’ 조정전치주의 도입을 중심으로 -
중재연구
2021 .03
-
임대차분쟁조정제도에 관하여
법학연구
2022 .12
-
Legal Challenges in Uniformly Regulating Administrative Mediation in Korea
집합건물법학
2021 .01
-
중국 변호사조정제도에 관한 고찰
한중사회과학연구
2020 .01
-
당사자에 의한 언론조정 결과 왜곡 공표의 법적 문제점 - 실제 분쟁 사례를 중심으로 -
미디어와 인격권
2022 .08
-
민간형 조정 활성화를 통한 소송과 조정의 균형 모색 - 사법자원의 효율적 분배라는 거시적 관점에서 본 민간형 조정활성화 관점에서 -
저스티스
2021 .02
-
상가임대차 분쟁조정 요인분석을 통한 개선방안 연구
부동산학보
2022 .12
-
조정제도에 관한 행정법적 쟁점
인권과 정의
2022 .06
-
민간조정의 활성화를 위한 입법적 과제 : 독일과 일본의 법제도와 시사점을 중심으로
저스티스
2016 .12
-
공정거래 관련 분쟁의 피해구제 활성화를 위한 조정제도 확대 방안 고찰
法學論文集
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
행정소송에서의 조정 : 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로
최계영
행정법연구
2010
.08
제4차 산업혁명 시대에 있어서 우리나라 조정산업(調停産業, Mediation Industry)의 진흥을 위한 연구 : 미국의 사법중재 및 조정서비스(JAMS)와 미국 중재협회(AAA)를 중심으로
조국현
법학연구
2018
.08
개인정보 분쟁조정제도의 활성화를 위한 헌법상 연구
권수진
,
김일환
미국헌법연구
2017
.04
노동분쟁에서 조정의 성공요인에 관한 경험적 연구 : 협상전략, 갈등 수준 및 조정인의 신뢰를 중심으로
이공희
,
신은종
산업관계연구
2010
.06
일본의 ADR법에 관한 소개
정영수
중앙법학
2005
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-360-000875887