메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국미술연구소 미술사논단 美術史論壇 第44號
발행연도
2017.6
수록면
101 - 115 (15page)
DOI
10.14380/AHF.2017.44.101

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Chinese artists in the early and mid 20th century argued that they should correct the problem of ‘xiěyì(寫意, arts freehand brushwork in traditional Chinese painting)’ focusing on ‘xíngsì(形似, likeliness in form)’ by taking the factual spirit of the western painting in order to modernize the Chinese painting. From the early 1920s, a word ‘guóhuà(國畵, Chinese painting)’ became to have a meaning of opposition to the western painting due to a strong chauvinistic idea. In 1930s, many artists turned their interest from oil painting to the study and creation activity of Chinese water and ink painting. It is connected to the ‘New Chinese Painting(新國畵)’ which the mainland Chinese government claimed in 1950s.
The Nationalist Party government that retreated to Taiwan after the complete defect at the Chinese Civil War in late 1949 asserted themselves as the authenticity of the Chinese culture and exercised Fascism. Since 1950s, the Taiwanese artistic world, and furthermore art education supported ‘guóhuà’ that revitalized traditionalism and conservatism ideology. But, there were some young Taiwanese artists who sought a new creation. Among them, ‘Fifth Moon Group(五月畫會)’ promoted by Liu Kuo Sung and ‘Dong Fang Group(東方畫會)’ founded bi Li Zhong Sheng accepted western artistic trends, especially the abstract expressionism making a challenge to closed, rigid and conservative artistic system and environment.
Nonetheless, in the midst of grim reality of the political conservatism, the development of the modern art of Taiwan was frustrated from 1960s. The avant-garde modernity was not allowed by the political authorities and many founding members of Fifth Moon Group and Dong Fang Group moved to Europe and the USA. The international status of Taiwan was unstable up to 1970s. Even though a new historic phase was open with the mainland China, the controversy regarding the identity of Taiwan still continues.

목차

Ⅰ. ‘현대’와 언어 환경
Ⅱ. 현대성과 확장성
Ⅲ. 현대성과 계몽, 일본 식민 시기의 대만
Ⅳ. 현대성과 계몽, 20세기 초기의 중국 대륙
Ⅴ. 국화의 반발, 20세기 중국 수묵회화의 어려움과 변화
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (10)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-650-001177745