지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The U.S civil service laws put lots of limitations on the public employee’s labor rights like Korean laws. However, the laws allow more public employees to enjoy the rights and to have more options on labor unions than Korean public laws.
The Civil Service Reform Act(1978) has adopted the public employee’s rights, similar to employees in private sectors, with exception denying the rights to some employees. And the Act recognizes that federal and state governments are the employer of a civil servant, actually government employee, in the public employment relations.
Furthermore, the Act has introduced the rule to balance the public interest for the majority or a society with the public employee’s labor rights to pursue the individual interest only for the labor union and its members. It declares that the public interest includes labor unions and collective bargaining in civil service, because recognizing labor rights for public employees can serve the public interest with improving the quality of public services by the employees.
Finally, the Act does not have a provision to prohibit the public labor unions from engaging any political activities. Instead, the federal election laws are applied to them as other labor unions in the private sector.
The Civil Service Reform Act(1978) has adopted the public employee’s rights, similar to employees in private sectors, with exception denying the rights to some employees. And the Act recognizes that federal and state governments are the employer of a civil servant, actually government employee, in the public employment relations.
Furthermore, the Act has introduced the rule to balance the public interest for the majority or a society with the public employee’s labor rights to pursue the individual interest only for the labor union and its members. It declares that the public interest includes labor unions and collective bargaining in civil service, because recognizing labor rights for public employees can serve the public interest with improving the quality of public services by the employees.
Finally, the Act does not have a provision to prohibit the public labor unions from engaging any political activities. Instead, the federal election laws are applied to them as other labor unions in the private sector.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 공무원 노동기본권 보장 법제
Ⅲ. 연방공무원법의 공무원 노동기본권 구성
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Ann C. Hodges / 1971 / The Civil Service-Collective Bargaining Conflict in the Public Sector: Attempts at Reconciliation / University of Chicago Law Review 38 (4)
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Ann C. Hodges / 1990 / The Interplay of Civil Service and Collective Bargaining Law in Public Sector Employee Discipline Cases / B.C. L.Rev 32 : 95 ~
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Arvid Anderson / 1977 / Impasse Resolution in Public Sector Collective Bargaining - An Examination of Compulsory Interest Arbitration in New York / St.John’s L.Rev 51 : 453 ~
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Jason A. Zwara / 2013 / Left in the Dark: How New Yorks’ Taylor Law Impairs Collective Bargaining / Hofs. L & Emp. L. J 31 : 193 ~
[학술지(정기간행물)] - James O’Reilly / 1983 / Structures and Conflicts: Ohio’s Collective Bargaining Law for Public Employees / Ohio St. L. J 44 : 891 ~
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Ann C. Hodges / 1990 / The Interplay of Civil Service and Collective Bargaining Law in Public Sector Employee Discipline Cases / B.C. L.Rev 32 : 95 ~
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Arvid Anderson / 1977 / Impasse Resolution in Public Sector Collective Bargaining - An Examination of Compulsory Interest Arbitration in New York / St.John’s L.Rev 51 : 453 ~
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Jason A. Zwara / 2013 / Left in the Dark: How New Yorks’ Taylor Law Impairs Collective Bargaining / Hofs. L & Emp. L. J 31 : 193 ~
[학술지(정기간행물)] - James O’Reilly / 1983 / Structures and Conflicts: Ohio’s Collective Bargaining Law for Public Employees / Ohio St. L. J 44 : 891 ~
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일본 공무원의 노동기본권과 노동조합 - 입법 논의의 검토를 중심으로
노동법포럼
2017 .07
-
사업장 자치, 노사협의회와 근로자대표
노동법포럼
2021 .11
-
미국 공무원의 노동기본권에 관한 연구
노동법논총
2018 .04
-
최근 공무원노사관계의 법적 쟁점과 과제 : 제20대 국회 제출 개정법률안에 대한 검토를 중심으로
법학연구
2017 .09
-
시대변혁기에 있어서 노동법의 역할
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
사용종속관계의 새로운 기준 및 평가
노동법논총
2020 .04
-
국방관련 공공기관 직원의 노동3권에 관한 법적 쟁점
노동법학
2021 .06
-
공무원노동조합에 관한 비교법적 연구 -노동3권의 인정범위를 중심으로-
법학논총
2019 .10
-
정당한 공무원노동조합 활동의 판단기준과 허용범위 등에 관한 연구
법학연구
2015 .09
-
사용종속관계의 개념 및 기준
노동법논총
2018 .04
-
공무원 노동조합의 발전과 노사관계의 성격변화
경영사연구
2017 .01
-
미국의 노동조합 경비원조에 대한 태도와 시사점
노동법논총
2017 .08
-
소위 ‘공무직’ 근로자와 동일가치노동 동일임금 원칙
사회보장법학
2023 .06
-
노동법의 규범구조와 근로권과 노동3권의 관계
원광법학
2019 .01
-
새 정부의 노동정책과 법제도의 개선 과제
노동법학
2022 .06
-
1980년대 헌법상 노동기본권의 개정과 노동권 실현에 있어서의 함의
연세법학
2023 .02
-
공공기관 노동조합의 노동권 : 단체교섭권과 단체협약을 중심으로
노동법연구
2015 .03
-
공무원노조 근무시간면제제도의 쟁점과 과제
노동법학
2023 .03
-
헌법상 노동3권 보장과 노조법상 근로자 개념의 재검토 시론(試論)
노동법논총
2021 .08
-
중국 노동조합의 노동쟁의 처리에 있어서의 역할에 관한 연구
Asia-Pacific Journal of Business & Commerce
2018 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0