지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to examine “Why did the United States plan a military attack on China?” Specifically, what military options were the US considering and what factors determine US military action? To this end, this paper first examines the options that the United States has been able to choose theoretically for the imminent nuclear threat from China, and what are the options and the decision making process of establishing the military action actually considered and what are their determinants? Secondly, it analyses that the change in the strategic interests of the U.S. had led to this conversion of non-proliferation policy which coerced China to join the NPT regime.
China’s nuclear development, in the short term, was threatening the further proliferation of nuclear weapons and the stability of the United States. Not only threatening the US allies militarily and psychologically, but also US worried that it would lose the nuclear superiority to USSR camps when the nuclear monopolies had already been lost. On the other hand, China’s capacity was not strong and the US nonproliferation policies were likely to be successful. China’s national capabilities could not fit the US military capabilities, and China’s nuclear development was still in the early stages. It was the reason why the US military attack on Chinese nuclear facilities was specifically considered. Eventually, of course, the US military attack plan was not implemented and efforts to stop China’s nuclear development failed, but the US led China to the NPT regime, and led to her responsible action and a high level of mutual trust.
China’s nuclear development, in the short term, was threatening the further proliferation of nuclear weapons and the stability of the United States. Not only threatening the US allies militarily and psychologically, but also US worried that it would lose the nuclear superiority to USSR camps when the nuclear monopolies had already been lost. On the other hand, China’s capacity was not strong and the US nonproliferation policies were likely to be successful. China’s national capabilities could not fit the US military capabilities, and China’s nuclear development was still in the early stages. It was the reason why the US military attack on Chinese nuclear facilities was specifically considered. Eventually, of course, the US military attack plan was not implemented and efforts to stop China’s nuclear development failed, but the US led China to the NPT regime, and led to her responsible action and a high level of mutual trust.
목차
1. 서론
2. 이론적 논의
3. 對中 비확산정책의 변화과정
4. 對중국 군사공격계획 (1955-1965)
5. NPT 편입 강압정책 (1965-1972)
6. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (63)
참고문헌 신청
[기타자료] - Lyndon B. Johnson Library / / National Security File(NSF), 1963-1969
[기타자료] - Committee File Committee on Nuclear Proliferation / / 13-61 through 13-65, Communist China
[기타자료] - Robert W. Komer / / Nuclear Weapons: November 1963-March 1966
[기타자료] - / / NSAM NSAM 320: Task Force on Nuclear Proliferation, 11-25-64
[기타자료] - / / NSAM 347: Release of Public Information Concerning Soviet, French and Communist Chinese Nuclear Tests, 5-24-66
[기타자료] - Committee File Committee on Nuclear Proliferation / / 13-61 through 13-65, Communist China
[기타자료] - Robert W. Komer / / Nuclear Weapons: November 1963-March 1966
[기타자료] - / / NSAM NSAM 320: Task Force on Nuclear Proliferation, 11-25-64
[기타자료] - / / NSAM 347: Release of Public Information Concerning Soviet, French and Communist Chinese Nuclear Tests, 5-24-66
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The P5's Nuclear Pursuit and Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT) at Challenge
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2023 .06
-
중국의 군사개혁과 군사현대화에 관한 연구
중소연구
2019 .11
-
중국의 원자력 발전 증가와 원자력 안전에 관한 국제 협력
국제정치연구
2015 .06
-
중국의 핵실험 과정에서 나타난 미국의 대응이 북핵 문제에 주는 함의
미래사회
2018 .11
-
Effects of US-China Relations on North Korean Nuclear Issue
IFANS FOCUS
2018 .12
-
중국의 대(對)주변국 군사 분쟁을 통해서 본 ‘적극방어’ 군사전략의 특징, 함의
군사
2018 .03
-
미중의 전략경쟁과 중국의 군사적 도전
한중사회과학연구
2022 .10
-
중국 군사전략의 변화에 대한 분석
한국군사학논집
2021 .06
-
A General Assessment of 10 Years of the Kim Jong-un Regime: In the Areas of the Military and Security
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2021 .12
-
북한 핵무기 위협에 대한 총력적 대비의 실태와 과제
군사
2016 .06
-
중국의 핵개발에 대한 미국의 비확산 정책: 북핵(北核) 문제에 주는 함의
국방정책연구
2020 .01
-
1970~1980년대 중국의 핵전력 강화 노력과 핵 억제전략
한국군사
2022 .06
-
Extended Deterrent Effect of China and Its Implications on the U.S.-N. Korean Nuclear Negotiation
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2020 .01
-
북한 핵문제의 고찰과 전술핵 배치에 대한 연구
대한정치학회보
2017 .01
-
핵무장국가의 군사전략과 전력기획 : 파키스탄 사례 분석과 북한에 대한 함의
군사
2018 .09
-
한국에 대한 중국위협론의 성립 조건과 군사적 함의
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2016 .08
-
억제의 불균형: 핵3원 체제와 핵전략을 통해 본 미중 군사 경쟁
국가전략
2016 .01
-
한반도 군사안보와 핵(核)전략: 북한 핵무장 위협에의 대응을 중심으로
국방연구
2016 .01
-
South Korea’s Defense Posture against the North Korean Nuclear Threat: Dangerous Reluctance
Asian International Studies Review
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0