메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
차은채 (연세대학교) 지준희 (연세대학교) 이한주 (연세대학교)
저널정보
한국사회체육학회 한국사회체육학회지 한국사회체육학회지 제77호
발행연도
2019.7
수록면
205 - 215 (11page)
DOI
10.51979/KSSLS.2019.07.77.205

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the specialized content knowledge (SCK) of novice and expert tennis coaches. Research questions are: (1) Are there differences in the recognition of performance errors between novice and expert coaches? (2) Are there differences in the task presentation that correct the performance errors between novice and expert coaches?
Methods: Participants were novice (N = 10) and expert (N = 10) tennis coaches. We collected data on (1 ) the knowledge of performing errors and (2) the knowledge of tasks representation that constitutes the SCK of tennis coaches. The coaches watched the game video of the beginning tennis player, described the technical error of the player in the video clip, and the performance action to be improved. And coaches have created a content map to improve performance errors. The content knowledge of performance error was analyzed by content analysis and the content map of task presentation knowledge was analyzed using a nonparametric statistical method.
Results: Results indicated that novice and expert tennis coaches were similar in performance error detection knowledge. Also, they showed 3.0 or higher in the SCK index scores. Findings also showed that both novice and expert coaches used extended tasks more than any other content development categories. Expert coaches used more refining tasks than novice ones.
Conclusion: SCK of novice and expert coaches was not different in error detection and instructional task presentation. Implications of this study were discussed for future research agenda.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-692-000951103