메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국로렌스학회 D. H. 로렌스 연구 D. H. 로렌스 연구 제25권 제2호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
71 - 93 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Focusing on J. M. Coetzee’s “the Lives of Animals,” this essay purports to probe his thinking on ‘the question of the animal’ and compare it with that of D. H Lawrence. These two pieces of writing were originally presented as lectures, then published as a book under the same title, and finally incorporated into a novel titled Elizabeth Costello. In the novel, the eponymous main character gives a series of lectures in which she presents herself as ‘an animal’, deeply wounded by sufferings of animals in the world today and people’s indifference to them. She vehemently criticizes the anthropocentric understanding of animals in the Western philosophy, putting emphasis on fullness of being, embodiedness, and joy of life. Through her lectures and other related scenes, Coetzee explores the possibility of an ethical relationship between humans and animals, based on the vulnerability and finitude of embodied beings. With his extraordinary sense of nonhuman otherness of animals and their fullness of being, Lawrence has also made a powerful denunciation of anthropocentrism and sought for a vital relationship with animals throughout his oeuvre. Yet there is a crucial difference between the two writers: Lawrence pays attention not only to the dimension of ‘being’, but also to that of ‘existence’, in which conflicts between species are inevitable, while Elizabeth or Coetzee exclusively focuses on the former and chooses to live as a vegetarian. The essay concludes with examining the implications of this difference in view of epochal change lying between them.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (11)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0