메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 외국학연구소 외국학연구 외국학연구 제35호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
285 - 308 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Unlike the German case in which West Germany unilaterally absorbed East Germany, the Cross-strait case in which both China and Taiwan have steadily developed the relationship over a long period of time may provide the Korean Peninsula with more useful references. However, the recent tense atmosphere in Cross-strait, which came to a head around the Sunflower Movement, urges us to rethink the way of the Cross-strait cooperation for the last decade. While it is true that the substantial achievement of the Cross-strait cooperation is the result of smart utilitarianism putting tricky political issues aside and placing economic cooperation in the forefront, the overall way of utilitarianism has deteriorated the emotional gap between people of both sides badly. It tells us that the so-called ‘peaceful development of Cross-strait’ is possible only when it creates certain space where civil societies from both sides can engage in the process of cooperation and reconciliation. The Cross-strait issue is a long-term issue. It is time for both sides to slow down the speedy economic-centered cooperation and look for a way to get to the integration at the emotional level in the long run. For this, comprehensive discussion on a variety of models of Cross-strait governance is required. This is the lesson we should take from the Cross-strait model when we think of the North-South Korean relationship.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0