메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영어교과교육학회 영어교과교육 영어교과교육 제16권 제4호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
45 - 66 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study aimed to investigate how Korean EFL college learners use two contrastive conjunctions, but and however in their academic writing and also to examine whether the learners use but differently from however in terms of semantic functions. In order to find the answers, the argumentative essays written by 68 female college students were classified into three groups (essays containing only but, essays containing only however, and essays containing both but and however as contrastive conjunctions), and each occasion of the two conjunctions were analyzed. The investigations revealed that by the use of but or however, the learners intended different meanings (in fact, nevertheless, as a result) and roles (as a marker indicating counterargument or attention drawer for emphasis) from what the two conjunctions are originally supposed to have or function: semantic contrast or denials of expectation (Celce-Murcia & Larsen-Freeman, 1999). Moreover, the analysis on the essays containing both but and however indicated that the learners did not distinguish but from however in conveying their semantic intentions. Pedagogical implications based on the research findings will be addressed.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0