지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제113호
- 발행연도
- 2019.9
- 수록면
- 47 - 84 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2019.09.113.47
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article is how the Manse(“Man-se, 萬歲”) Protests expanded in the Gyeonggi and Incheon area. Observation is made on several aspects: first-ever gatherings in each of all areas, the role the market place played in such protests, and how the size of the Japanese population living in the areas affected the protests.
The Gyeong’gi province and the wider Incheon area today served as key areas in the March 1st movement, but they were curiously absent from the early protest coordinators’ plan (to spread the protest countrywide), so the Manse protests in the area began a little bit late than other regions. However, in the early phase of the March 1st movement, the students were instrumental in spreading the Manse protests inside the Gyeong’gi･Incheon area, and after March 20th the marketplaces served as a virtual mobile platform. Wherever makeshift markets were opened large-scale Manse protests ensued. In Gimpo, Yangpyeong, Paju, Suweon, Jangdan and Icheon, the protests literally trailed the marketplaces as they moved from one place to the next. Protests in marketplaces were much more fierce, and the response of the Japanese colonial authorities were also much harsher.
Also examined in this article is the correlation between the level of activeness (alongside size) of the March 1st protests in respective areas, and the size of Japanese population living in each of those areas. We can see that, in individual areas located throughout the Gyeong’gi･Incheon region, the less the size of Japanese population in the area was, the more the Manse protests tended to become fierce and active. Contrary to a previous notion which argued that areas which were pillaged by the Japanese more so than other areas were the ones that displayed much more fierce protests, strong resistance and protests seem to have been displayed in areas where local communities of Koreans remained relatively in tact.
In future studies, regions other than Gyeong’gi and Incheon should be examined more as well, and as many country-wide variables as possible should be taken into account. Only by doing so we would be able to have a more comprehensive and accurate historical review of the entire March 1st movement.
The Gyeong’gi province and the wider Incheon area today served as key areas in the March 1st movement, but they were curiously absent from the early protest coordinators’ plan (to spread the protest countrywide), so the Manse protests in the area began a little bit late than other regions. However, in the early phase of the March 1st movement, the students were instrumental in spreading the Manse protests inside the Gyeong’gi･Incheon area, and after March 20th the marketplaces served as a virtual mobile platform. Wherever makeshift markets were opened large-scale Manse protests ensued. In Gimpo, Yangpyeong, Paju, Suweon, Jangdan and Icheon, the protests literally trailed the marketplaces as they moved from one place to the next. Protests in marketplaces were much more fierce, and the response of the Japanese colonial authorities were also much harsher.
Also examined in this article is the correlation between the level of activeness (alongside size) of the March 1st protests in respective areas, and the size of Japanese population living in each of those areas. We can see that, in individual areas located throughout the Gyeong’gi･Incheon region, the less the size of Japanese population in the area was, the more the Manse protests tended to become fierce and active. Contrary to a previous notion which argued that areas which were pillaged by the Japanese more so than other areas were the ones that displayed much more fierce protests, strong resistance and protests seem to have been displayed in areas where local communities of Koreans remained relatively in tact.
In future studies, regions other than Gyeong’gi and Incheon should be examined more as well, and as many country-wide variables as possible should be taken into account. Only by doing so we would be able to have a more comprehensive and accurate historical review of the entire March 1st movement.
목차
머리말
1. 초기 만세시위 전국화와 철도의 역할
2. 경기·인천지역의 첫 번째 만세시위들의 전개양상
3. 경기·인천지역 만세시위에서 장시의 역할
4. 경기·인천지역 만세시위 규모와 재조선일본인의 침투
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (52)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
3·1운동기 인천지역 시위의 양상과 특징
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
수원 만세시위의 양상과 특징
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
Determinants of Unaffiliated Citizen Protests : The Korean Candlelight Protests of 2016–2017
Korea Journal
2019 .03
-
Beyond Continuity: The Defiance of Ordinary Citizens and the 2016 Candlelight Protests in South Korea
Korea Journal
2020 .06
-
만세시위의 다원적 의미와 지속되는 지역공동체 - 안성군 3.1운동의 새로운 이해 -
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
경기·인천 지역 3·1운동 판결과 정치적 함의
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
1919년 3월 황해도 수안 만세시위의 재구성
민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
이승만 사임 성명 전후 마산에서의 시위 －할아버지·할머니, 부산 원정 데모대의 시위를 중심으로－
한국사연구
2025 .03
-
What Makes Swing Voters Participate in Protests? The Effects of Voting Patterns and Election Cycles on Participation in Candlelight Protests in South Korea
Korea Observer
2023 .06
-
일본 독도정책의 특징과 딜레마-시마네현을 중심으로
독도연구
2019 .01
-
개성의 3·1운동
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
서독 대학생들의 주독(駐獨) 남한대사관 난입사건과 68혁명 — 상호규정성의 공시성과 비동시성 —
사림
2018 .01
-
From Collective Action to Impeachment: Political Opportunities of the Candlelight Protests in South Korea
Korea Observer
2021 .01
-
일제의 경기·인천지역 3·1운동 탄압 양상
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
전주지역 3·1운동의 전개과정과 그후 동향
숭실사학
2018 .01
-
농촌지역 3.1운동 확산과 공간적⋅형태별 특성
민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
1919년 3.1운동에 대한 재(再)인식: 선교사들의 현장구술채록과 장로교회 총회 회의록(제8회, 1919)을 중심으로
선교와 신학
2019 .06
-
대구·경북의 3·1 운동과 대구성경학교
신학과 목회
2020 .06
-
경성의학전문학교 학생들의 3.1운동 참여 양상
한국민족운동사연구
2019 .01
-
1919년 3월 1일 만세시위, 연대의 힘
역사교육
2018 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0