지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제114호
- 발행연도
- 2019.12
- 수록면
- 63 - 102 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2019.12.114.63
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In historiography, there are discrepancies between historical facts and historical researches, and gaps between historical researches and history education. The Historiography is a field of study examining historical facts, yet such examination(research) is always accompanied and even affected by the interests and interpretations of the examiner, and education is often required to reflect the needs of the society or even that of the state. In this article, the palace construction projects in King Gwang’hae-gun’s reign is chosen as a subject which maybe useful in our examination of how facts, research and education could interact with each other either harmoniously or contentiously.
In a society based on agricultural economy, concentrated fiscal investment is inevitable, so palatial constructions (which tend to distract resources from such effort) often threaten the stability of the system or even the regime itself. So quite early on, historians took notice of all the palatial constructions that continued during King Gwang’hae-gun’s reign. Adequate understanding and appropriate evaluation of this particular subject is crucial in determining the nature of politics that was maintained during his reign, and in understanding the ramifications of the two Horan wars that broke out during King Injo’s reign, as palatial constructions were oftentimes cited as a major catalyst for the fall of Gwang’hae-gun and the restoration staged by King Injo.
Palatial constructions should not be examined as an isolated project, but as an event that was interconnected with other political conditions unfolding in and out of the country. First of all, these construction projects had certain influences upon the reform efforts of the tribute system, and especially the initiation of the Seonhye-beob(宣惠法) law. Second, these constructions not only hampered the above-mentioned tributary reform efforts, but caused the need for further and additional taxation. Third, it pushed local authorities’ fiscal situation almost over the edge. Fourth, prevalent at the time were provisions and receptions of necessary materials and resources, which also strongly suggests coerced submission from the weak. Fifth, even governmental seats became objects of deals, in a clandestine effort to secure money to pay for all these construction costs. Six, Gwang’ hae-gun himself was so immersed in the project, even to the extent of being derelict in his other duties. Seventh, at a time of the Hugeum rising as a new force in the north, diverting vital resources to construction projects did weaken the dynasty’s overall defense. Considering all this, it was only natural for all the scholars to be extremely critical of Gwang’hae-gun era’s palatial constructions.
However, such understanding of the academic society is yet to be reflected in history textbooks for Middle schools as well as High schools. Current guideline for the Middle & High school History textbooks only dictate that contents underlining notions like ‘Economic policy was designed to enhance public stability (through Daedong-beob law and Land Survey projects)’ or ‘Neutral Diplomacy was upheld,’ should be included in the narrative of the textbook, while Gwang’hae-gun’s demoting of his stepmother, his killing of his own half-brother(廢母殺弟), and all the palatial constructions mentioned above, are never elaborated. The omission of this period’s such aspects borders on distortion of historical truth of this period in general.
In a society based on agricultural economy, concentrated fiscal investment is inevitable, so palatial constructions (which tend to distract resources from such effort) often threaten the stability of the system or even the regime itself. So quite early on, historians took notice of all the palatial constructions that continued during King Gwang’hae-gun’s reign. Adequate understanding and appropriate evaluation of this particular subject is crucial in determining the nature of politics that was maintained during his reign, and in understanding the ramifications of the two Horan wars that broke out during King Injo’s reign, as palatial constructions were oftentimes cited as a major catalyst for the fall of Gwang’hae-gun and the restoration staged by King Injo.
Palatial constructions should not be examined as an isolated project, but as an event that was interconnected with other political conditions unfolding in and out of the country. First of all, these construction projects had certain influences upon the reform efforts of the tribute system, and especially the initiation of the Seonhye-beob(宣惠法) law. Second, these constructions not only hampered the above-mentioned tributary reform efforts, but caused the need for further and additional taxation. Third, it pushed local authorities’ fiscal situation almost over the edge. Fourth, prevalent at the time were provisions and receptions of necessary materials and resources, which also strongly suggests coerced submission from the weak. Fifth, even governmental seats became objects of deals, in a clandestine effort to secure money to pay for all these construction costs. Six, Gwang’ hae-gun himself was so immersed in the project, even to the extent of being derelict in his other duties. Seventh, at a time of the Hugeum rising as a new force in the north, diverting vital resources to construction projects did weaken the dynasty’s overall defense. Considering all this, it was only natural for all the scholars to be extremely critical of Gwang’hae-gun era’s palatial constructions.
However, such understanding of the academic society is yet to be reflected in history textbooks for Middle schools as well as High schools. Current guideline for the Middle & High school History textbooks only dictate that contents underlining notions like ‘Economic policy was designed to enhance public stability (through Daedong-beob law and Land Survey projects)’ or ‘Neutral Diplomacy was upheld,’ should be included in the narrative of the textbook, while Gwang’hae-gun’s demoting of his stepmother, his killing of his own half-brother(廢母殺弟), and all the palatial constructions mentioned above, are never elaborated. The omission of this period’s such aspects borders on distortion of historical truth of this period in general.
목차
머리말
1. 광해군대 궁궐 영선(營繕) 약사(略史)
2. 궁궐 공사의 영향과 원인에 대한 논의
3. 교과서의 서술 내용의 검토
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
연산군과 광해군 최후의 장면
문학치료연구
2018 .01
-
한국어의 `하-` 지지 규칙
한국어학
2016 .11
-
‘X-게 하다’ 사동구성과 구성문법적 접근
언어학 연구
2017 .01
-
교수요목기 중등 역사 검정 교과서의 발행 상황과 목록화
역사교육
2019 .09
-
The “Concealed Passive” Construction Needs Investigating Diachronically
언어학 연구
2018 .04
-
하타 요가(Haṭha Yoga) 자세(āsana) 수행의 효과__주요 3종 문헌을 중심으로__
인도철학
2019 .01
-
교과서 내용 서술 체계의 현황 및 개선 방향 : 조선 전·후기 서술을 사례로
역사교육
2018 .09
-
역사 교과서 집필진의 고려시대 교과서 서사 인식과 서술 방향
역사교육
2019 .03
-
역사교육에서 고대사 영역의 내용 체계와 계열성 검토 : 2011 교육과정과 2013 검정교과서를 중심으로
역사교육
2018 .09
-
한국 고등학교 교과서에 사용된 영어동사의 보충절 분석
새한영어영문학
2016 .11
-
역사교과서 검정 준거자료의 구속력과 집필자의 자율성 -『중학교 역사』 교과서 ‘서양 근대 단원’을 중심으로-
역사와교육
2019 .01
-
중국 초등학교 어문 교과서의 체제와 내용 분석
국어교육연구
2015 .10
-
텍스트마이닝을 활용한 중국어 구문 연구 동향 분석
담화와인지
2023 .05
-
‘한국사 교과서’ 조선 후기 신분제 내용의 劃一과 固着
역사교육
2016 .03
-
한중 학부 전공 기초 중국어 교재에서의把-구문 문법 설명과 예문 대조 분석
외국학연구
2018 .01
-
How Metonymy Influences Grammar : The Case of Concrete-Noun-plus-hata Constructions in Korean
담화와인지
2016 .11
-
문학 교과서 개발과 구성의 경직성에 대한 비판적 고찰－'작은 교과서'를 지향하며 －
문학교육학
2019 .01
-
중국 상하이 『역사』교과서 논쟁과 지식인 : 상하이 지역 고등학교 역사교과서의 변화
중국근현대사연구
2019 .03
-
2014년 발행 고등학교 『한국사』 교과서의 삼국시대 정치사 서술 검토
역사교육논집
2016 .01
-
중국어 2급 교재 어휘 분석 - 『國際漢語敎學通用大綱』과 비교하여
중국어문학논집
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000225969