지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The epitaph, which claimed to be the Chinese descent, usually presented historical figures or events described in the records to reveal that their ancestors came from China. This was thought to be a way to increase the veracity of the claim, however, it was overlooked that there was a premise that the ancestors from China existed. In this sense, the epitaph claiming to be the Chinese descent shows that there were people of Chinese descent residing for generations in the territory of the late Goguryeo period. In addition, the place names that show their surrender to the Tang Dynasty indicate that there were emigrants of Chinese descent arranged in the Liaodong region.
Goguryeo made efforts to secure Chinese emigrants and actively made use of them under the policy of SujaeSuim(隨才授任, to entrust office based on one’s talent). It was more important whether they were useful in the state development and foreign strategy of Goguryeo than the size of the groups that they brought. An example for that was Dongsu(冬壽), who had entered Goguryeo all alone, played an active part in the management of Nangnang, Daebang(樂浪帶方) area. In addition, Goguryeo’s dissolution of the affiliated relationship between the king of Northern Yan(北燕王) and the people of Helong Castle(和龍城民) showed the reorganization of the emigrant group, which was different from the relationship between the northern emigrants and Southern Dynasties(南朝) of China that guaranteed their own identity.
Meanwhile, the highest political and social status Chinese emigrants obtained in Goguryeo society is interpreted as middle grade nobility. Although it was thought that they could obtain up to the office of Yoksal(褥薩) based on the epitaph that claimed Chinese descent, but the top five official rank(官位) monopolized the administration of state affairs of Goguryeo. Yoksal was one of the important offices that those of official rank could obtain. It is hard to consider that foreigners could obtain this privileged class. On the other hand, the Chinese emigrants are thought to have many uses in connection with the construction of military defense system of Liaodong. They were assigned as Songni(屬吏) or the people of castle(城民), and it seems to be the origin of Chinese emigrants who had resided for generations in Liaodong until the late Goguryeo period.
Goguryeo made efforts to secure Chinese emigrants and actively made use of them under the policy of SujaeSuim(隨才授任, to entrust office based on one’s talent). It was more important whether they were useful in the state development and foreign strategy of Goguryeo than the size of the groups that they brought. An example for that was Dongsu(冬壽), who had entered Goguryeo all alone, played an active part in the management of Nangnang, Daebang(樂浪帶方) area. In addition, Goguryeo’s dissolution of the affiliated relationship between the king of Northern Yan(北燕王) and the people of Helong Castle(和龍城民) showed the reorganization of the emigrant group, which was different from the relationship between the northern emigrants and Southern Dynasties(南朝) of China that guaranteed their own identity.
Meanwhile, the highest political and social status Chinese emigrants obtained in Goguryeo society is interpreted as middle grade nobility. Although it was thought that they could obtain up to the office of Yoksal(褥薩) based on the epitaph that claimed Chinese descent, but the top five official rank(官位) monopolized the administration of state affairs of Goguryeo. Yoksal was one of the important offices that those of official rank could obtain. It is hard to consider that foreigners could obtain this privileged class. On the other hand, the Chinese emigrants are thought to have many uses in connection with the construction of military defense system of Liaodong. They were assigned as Songni(屬吏) or the people of castle(城民), and it seems to be the origin of Chinese emigrants who had resided for generations in Liaodong until the late Goguryeo period.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 문제의 제기
3. 중국계 유이민의 來投와 고구려의 ‘隨才授任’ 정책
4. 요동지역의 再編과 중국계 유이민 안치
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
인지문법에 기초한 “NP1+NP2+VP” 구문 연구 : 소유를 나타내는 의미관계를 중심으로
중국조선어문
2015 .11
-
고려시기 외직 판관의 설치와 변화
서강인문논총
2024 .08
-
林碧堂 金氏의 생애와 詩文學 硏究
인문학연구
2019 .01
-
국어교육에서 '갈등'을 다루는 방식에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 중학교 국어 교과서를 중심으로
한국문예비평연구
2019 .01
-
후산(后山) 정윤영(鄭胤永)의 시 세계 일고
온지논총
2020 .01
-
'오이디푸스 콤플렉스'와 '대상 a' 개념을 통한 사례 분석연구 : 라캉 이론을 중심으로
현대정신분석
2025 .02
-
고려시대 京山府의 성립과 변천
한국학논집
2019 .03
-
후한시대(後漢時代) 내군(內郡) 군병(郡兵)의 존재와 운용 - 후한(後漢) 광무제(光武帝)의 도위관(都尉官) 폐지의 실상
동북아역사논총
2022 .03
-
정판교鄭板橋 난·죽·석 제화題畫 작품의 판화적版畫的 특징 연구
중국학논총
2024 .03
-
고등학교 교과서 수록 현대시에 나타난 바다 이미지 연구
우리문학연구
2018 .01
-
공포영화의 주체로서의 팜므 카스트리스 : <김복남 살인사건의 전말>을 중심으로
우리문학연구
2017 .01
-
무등산 안심사 개판본의 서지적 연구
한국불교학
2024 .08
-
碧巖 覺性 발원 順天 松廣寺刊 大方廣佛華嚴經疏 變相圖
강좌 미술사
2019 .01
-
매체에서의 유행어 사용에 대한 국어 교육적 접근과 해석
어문연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-912-000432585