지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Vol.8 No.2 JUNE 2005
- 발행연도
- 2005.6
- 수록면
- 111 - 140 (30page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper intends to examine the relationship between Korean people’s perspective upon the national issues today and the problem of ethnic Koreans overseas, especially the “Joseon-jok” (people of Korean descent) living in China, with regard to enactment and amendment processes of the Law for Ethnic Koreans. The Law for Ethnic Koreans prior to the recent amendment bears special meaning as it was the law that “officiated” the government’s discriminatory treatment upon specific groups among the ethnic Korean society. How could such significantly flawed bill have been enacted? It must have been made possible because of the misunderstanding regarding issues on ethnic Koreans overseas (especially the issue of China-based ethnic Koreans) that the Korean public has been carrying for a long time.
There is a particular perspective within the Korean society of the concept of a single ethnic group, the concept of a single culture, and the concept of a single state to be the same. This kind of specific consciousness regarding the people’s own sense of being members of a single ethnic group makes the people more sensitive of the “difference” between “us” and “them.” When other factors such as the scale of the state are added to the equation, the people tend to separate even their own overseas brethrens from themselves and take them out of the boundary of “us.” The ethnic Koreans living in China are being perceived differently and ultimately excluded from the Korean ethnic group because they live in China. Our consciousness and perspectives regarding national issues are essentially based upon the boundaries and perimeters of the Korean peninsula. So we tend to differentiate ourselves who are living in such domain from our brethrens who have been living in China or other areas, and our own discriminative intentions and actions perpetrated against the ethnic Koreans in China are justified as such.
What we need to do today is to establish a new type of national sense of identity that is based upon the concept of an equal, free civilian community. Socalled Korean Network could be an appropriate alternative. The identity of the new Korean national community should not be confined to the concept and discourse of “being and composed of a homogeneous ethnic group.” Instead it should be based upon the attitude of acknowledging each other’s differences and the mutual intentions to gather and use all kinds of wisdom obtained in different kinds of historical experiences of various peoples.
There is a particular perspective within the Korean society of the concept of a single ethnic group, the concept of a single culture, and the concept of a single state to be the same. This kind of specific consciousness regarding the people’s own sense of being members of a single ethnic group makes the people more sensitive of the “difference” between “us” and “them.” When other factors such as the scale of the state are added to the equation, the people tend to separate even their own overseas brethrens from themselves and take them out of the boundary of “us.” The ethnic Koreans living in China are being perceived differently and ultimately excluded from the Korean ethnic group because they live in China. Our consciousness and perspectives regarding national issues are essentially based upon the boundaries and perimeters of the Korean peninsula. So we tend to differentiate ourselves who are living in such domain from our brethrens who have been living in China or other areas, and our own discriminative intentions and actions perpetrated against the ethnic Koreans in China are justified as such.
What we need to do today is to establish a new type of national sense of identity that is based upon the concept of an equal, free civilian community. Socalled Korean Network could be an appropriate alternative. The identity of the new Korean national community should not be confined to the concept and discourse of “being and composed of a homogeneous ethnic group.” Instead it should be based upon the attitude of acknowledging each other’s differences and the mutual intentions to gather and use all kinds of wisdom obtained in different kinds of historical experiences of various peoples.
목차
Introduction: Three Stories
Modern History of Korea and Ethnic Koreans Overseas
The Public’s Perception of Ethnic Koreans Living in China
Korea’s Policy on Ethnic Koreans Overseas before the Enactment of the “Law for Ethnic Koreans”
The Advent of the Theory of “Universal Cosmopolitanism,” and the Enactment of the Law for Ethnic Koreans Overseas
After the Law for Ethnic Koreans Was Ruled as Being Unconstitutional
Toward a New National Community for the Korean People
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Korean American Experience : Ethnic Mobilization as a Mode of Incorporation
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2001 .12
-
日本の公立学校における民族学級の意味 : S小学校の事例を手がかりに
일어일문학
2017 .02
-
연변 조선족 중고교 개편 교과서 수록 시 연구
어문연구
2011 .01
-
Language and Ethnic Self-Consciousness among Koreans in Kazakhstan
Korea Journal
1995 .06
-
해외한민족 문화공동체 건설 모색을 위한 시론
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2001 .09
-
The Korean Minority in China : The Policy of the Chinese Communist Party and the Question of Korean Identity
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2001 .12
-
재외동포용 한국어 교재 개발의 성과 및 과제
이중언어학
2014 .01
-
러시아의 민족 언어 지원 정책 분석 연구: 소련의 민족 언어 평등 정책과의 비교를 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2016 .01
-
Ethnic Art Activities of Soviet Koreans in Central Asia
Korea Journal
1984 .02
-
재외동포법의 배경과 쟁점
고조선단군학
2002 .12
-
중국 연변 조선족의 민족정체성에 대한 일고찰(1945.8-1950.말)
한국사연구
2008 .03
-
한국 재외동포정책 10년의 회고와 전망 - 연구사 전개를 중심으로
민족연구
2009 .01
-
金城一 紀의 『GO』를 통해 본 재일 신세대 작가의 민족 인식 : 李恢成의 『砧をうつ女』와 비교를 중심으로
어문학
2008 .09
-
‘보이지 않는 자’를 가시화하기— 재일한인 사회조사의 원점
인문논총
2018 .01
-
기층민주주의 발전과 정치적 의의 - 선거개혁을 중심으로
민족연구
2009 .01
-
카작스탄 고려인 관련 영상물에서 나타난 고려인 주요인사 및 민족문화 관련 기관의 활동
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .06
-
현대 카자흐스탄 20년의 발전과 고려인 사회의 변화
민족연구
2013 .01
-
Diaspora and Beyond : There is No Home for Koreans in Japan
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2001 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000955284