메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sun-Choung Ahn (Shinhan University)
저널정보
한국조리학회 Culinary Science & Hospitality Research Culinary Science & Hospitality Research Vol.26 No.9(Wn.122)
발행연도
2020.9
수록면
32 - 41 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study investigated the basic data for the management of dietary behaviors and nutrition education programs. For this purpose, the differences between students majoring in food and students not majoring in food were analyzed in terms of the dietary habits, nutrition intake, and ratios of nutrition intake compared with the recommended intake volume for Koreans. Findings of the study are as follows: As for the demographics of the subjects, 265 (47.6%) for food major, while 292 (52.4%) were non-major. The average height and body weight of participants were 165.6 ㎝ and 57.94 ㎏ for the food major and 164.6 ㎝ and 57.4 ㎏ for non-major. As for the BMI distribution, the food major group had more students who were in the normal range of BMI, while the total dietary attitude score was higher with the food major than with non-major (p<0.05). The energy intake was 1,151 ㎉ with the food major and 1,154 ㎉ with non-major. Both of the two groups took less energy than recommended. The protein intake and the ratio of the intakes of vitamins and minerals were all lower than the recommended levels. However, in this case, the food major group was taking at a higher ratio compared to that of non-major. The above-mentioned findings suggested that it would be possible to induce changes in dietary habits by understanding the relations between dietary habits and nutrition knowledge of the food major and non-major, while it would be necessary to introduce systematic nutrition education programs and studies to translate the acquired knowledge into actions.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. INTRODUCTION
2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
3. STUDY METHOD
4. ANALYSIS
5. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (35)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-594-001285637