메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이승호 (건국대학교)
저널정보
한국형사판례연구회 형사판례연구 형사판례연구 제27권
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
55 - 83 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
How should the “non-penal detention” conducted in foreign countries be handled in Korea? To review this topic, this article divides matters into three categories. First, it is a case of conviction in a foreign country. In this case, pending detention in a foreign country is included in the sentence of the Korean justice under Article 7 of the Criminal Act. Second, there is a case where an innocent verdict is made in a foreign country. At this time, there is a conflict of opinion as to whether pending detention before the innocent verdict is included in the Korean sentence. The Supreme Court ruling in 2017 ruled that the application of Article 7 of the Criminal Act is excluded, and that it can be considered as the reason for the sentence of Article 51 of the Criminal Act. However, a minority opinion has accepted the application of Article 7 of the Criminal Act. This article critically examines both opinions and suggests that the application of Article 57 of the Criminal Act should include the pending detention held in a foreign country into domestic execution. The third issue is the case where no trial has been conducted in a foreign country. This article examines the two Supreme Court decisions related to this case and suggests the way of incorporating the term of detention in foreign countries into domestic execution through the application of Article 57 of the Criminal Act. In conclusion, this paper argues that “non-penal detention” executed in foreign countries should be incorporated into the domestic sentence in all cases.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0