메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국금융법학회 금융법연구 금융법연구 제12권 제1호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
193 - 222 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Traditionally, a reinsurance contract was considered to be an honorable agreement based on mutual trust and confidence between a reinsured company and a reinsurer. However, as the number of reinsurers and reinsured companies has dramatically increased, and the number of claims has significantly risen, the nature and structure of the reinsurance relationship has changed and disputes between reinsurance-contract parties have multiplied accordingly. Reinsurers often insist that they are not obligated to indemnify the cedent companies because these companies have breached their duties, as derived from claims clauses the reinsurance contracts. There have been few reinsurance cases between reinsurers and reinsured companies before Korean courts so far, but, in light of the changing nature of the relationship between reinsurance parties, many relevant future disputes may be resolved by courts instead of by mutual consent. Therefore, it is now useful to examine what claims clauses of reinsurance contract mean; how they interact with other reinsurance clauses or principles, such as follow-the-settlement or follow-the-fortune clauses; and how the breach of claims clauses affects reinsurers’liabilities. Because the legal principles of reinsurance have been developed by English and American scholars and courts, we should carefully examine those countries’reinsurance customs and principles and apply those findings to a reinsurance contract that would be governed by the law of Korea, if possible.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0