지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examined the problems of the law of “Resignation from public office(解官)” for Three-Year Mourning from the perspective of uncertainty in the standard of the mourning period, and reviewed measures of the southern countries that secured legal stability.
One of the important criminal components of the Resignation law is the violation of the period of mourning. However, if the period of mourning is not clearly defined, it is impossible to judge the violation of the law itself. In this respect, the Resignation law had the following problems.
First, the date of xuanji(禫祭), which means the end of the mourning period, was not unified. The court officially adopted Wangsuk"s 25 months, but there were many people who followed Jeonghyeon"s 27 months in the private sector. It was not until 27 months was announced as an official example in Song(宋), and all of the southern countries followed Song later. Unification of the date of xuanji should be a priority in order to eliminate the ambiguity and uncertainty of the law.
Second, there is a problem of leap month as a matter to be particularly careful about in mourning period. Since it takes 13 months every 2-3 years, confusion occurs if there is no unified leap month application method when calculating the mourning period. In the Southern Dynasty, the principle of calculating leap month was repeatedly confirmed, that for one-year(朞年服) and three-year mourning the leap month was not calculated but for nine months(9月大功服) or less it separately calculated, which had the effect of enhancing legal stability.
Third, the in-mind Mourning Rites(心喪制) introduced in the early Jin was followed by southern state. The original deadline for the in-mind Mourning was 25 months, but at that time, some people added xuanji(禫祭) to perform 27 months of mourning. If the deadline for in-mind Mourning is not clearly determined, administrative disruptions will occur, as well as serious judicial problems due to confusion in the criteria for judgement. In Song, a national law was announced to limit the deadline for in-mind Mourning to 25 months, and the Southern Dynasties followed suit.
It should not be forgotten that all of the legal texts related to “Resignation from public office(解官)” in the statutes of the Sui-Tang period are laws that have come through the legislative and improvement process of the Yangjin-Nanjiao era.
One of the important criminal components of the Resignation law is the violation of the period of mourning. However, if the period of mourning is not clearly defined, it is impossible to judge the violation of the law itself. In this respect, the Resignation law had the following problems.
First, the date of xuanji(禫祭), which means the end of the mourning period, was not unified. The court officially adopted Wangsuk"s 25 months, but there were many people who followed Jeonghyeon"s 27 months in the private sector. It was not until 27 months was announced as an official example in Song(宋), and all of the southern countries followed Song later. Unification of the date of xuanji should be a priority in order to eliminate the ambiguity and uncertainty of the law.
Second, there is a problem of leap month as a matter to be particularly careful about in mourning period. Since it takes 13 months every 2-3 years, confusion occurs if there is no unified leap month application method when calculating the mourning period. In the Southern Dynasty, the principle of calculating leap month was repeatedly confirmed, that for one-year(朞年服) and three-year mourning the leap month was not calculated but for nine months(9月大功服) or less it separately calculated, which had the effect of enhancing legal stability.
Third, the in-mind Mourning Rites(心喪制) introduced in the early Jin was followed by southern state. The original deadline for the in-mind Mourning was 25 months, but at that time, some people added xuanji(禫祭) to perform 27 months of mourning. If the deadline for in-mind Mourning is not clearly determined, administrative disruptions will occur, as well as serious judicial problems due to confusion in the criteria for judgement. In Song, a national law was announced to limit the deadline for in-mind Mourning to 25 months, and the Southern Dynasties followed suit.
It should not be forgotten that all of the legal texts related to “Resignation from public office(解官)” in the statutes of the Sui-Tang period are laws that have come through the legislative and improvement process of the Yangjin-Nanjiao era.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 삼년상 解官 법률의 입법과 현실
3. 시행상의 문제점과 개선 방안
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
魏晉시기 관리의 三年喪 “解官” 법제화 과정
동양사학연구
2022 .03
-
효자전, 경전과 관행의 사이 - 조선 초 왕조실록의 효행 통계를 중심으로 -
양명학
2021 .06
-
발해 〈함화 11년 중대성첩〉의 재검토
고구려발해연구
2024 .07
-
『묵재일기』 모친상으로 본 『가례』 식주(食住) 규제의 실천과 변통
한국민속학
2021 .05
-
『당률총론』·『당률각론』
동북아역사논총
2022 .06
-
조선 후기 王妃父母服制의 변화와 의미
장서각
2019 .10
-
兩章時調에 對한 小考
시조학논총
2016 .07
-
儒敎 喪禮와의 비교를 통해 본 조선 후기 天主敎 喪禮의 특징
교회사연구
2022 .06
-
삼일장 시대에 지속되는 유교식 삼년상의 전승 양상
비교민속학
2024 .10
-
沈大允의 『儀禮正論』, 『喪服』편에 대한 연구
양명학
2016 .12
-
唐律을 통해 본 唐代 免罪型 自首의 成立條件에 관한 一考察
중국사연구
2021 .01
-
唐朝 官人 喪葬 연구의 현황과 과제
역사와 세계
2017 .06
-
長崎唐話的「替」字探索
한국어사 연구
2019 .03
-
Perpetuating the Other: Mourning and Alterity in Sarah Ruhl’s Eurydice
영어영문학21
2021 .01
-
조선 초기의 禮樂 정비와 典禮書 간행: 『세종실록』｢오례｣를 중심으로
민족문화연구
2023 .02
-
한국 전통 상․장례(喪․葬禮) 문화에 나타난 죽음관이 상실대처에 미치는 영향: 데리다(Derrida)의 애도이론과 관련하여
종교교육학연구
2023 .06
-
마한･백제 喪葬文化에 대한 중국측 기록의 검토
한국사학보
2022 .08
-
유교의 禮學的 탐구를 통한 孝 사상 고찰
민족문화연구
2021 .11
-
애도 주제의 활용 양상과 그 변천 소고 - 北宋 哀悼詩를 중심으로
중국학
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0