개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the Opinions on Further Reducing the Burden of Homework and Off-campus Training for Students in Compulsory Education (abbreviated as the “Double reduction policy” Opinions) issued at the end of July 2021, as the “No. 1 Project” in the field of education, the double reduction policy has triggered discussion and reflection in the academic community and society from the original intention of the policy to its implementation. The “double reduction policy” includes 30 key points in eight major aspects. The main measures include: comprehensively reducing the total amount and time of homework, improving after-school service level, comprehensively standardizing after-school training behaviors, improving the quality of education and teaching, and strengthening supporting governance, which reflects the first principle of “student-oriented”. In this context, whether and how the “double reduction” policy can solve these problems and achieve a benign education ecology has become a hot issue concerned by all circles. Since the Ministry of Education first proposed the “Burden reduction” policy in 1955, China has issued more than 50 relevant policies to address the practical problem of students" excessive academic burden. Although these “Burden reduction” policies are large in number and density, but they fluctuate greatly and have short cycles, have no end, and have no details. The lack of supervision has put the government in the awkward position of “reducing the burden of students more and more”. How to realize the implementation of “burden reduction” policy and realize the virtuous circle of education ecology has gradually become a public education issue from personal problems, and become a focus issue in the field of education policy and people"s livelihood. This paper reviews the course of “burden reduction”policy with this kind of problem awareness, and analyzes the background, connotation and concept of “double reduction policy”, and explore how to realize the virtuous circle of education ecology.
This paper recognizes that the “double reduction policy” is an important measure to solve the problem of educational ecological imbalance from its connotation to its concept, and the implementation of the “double reduction policy” is a powerful means to achieve equitable and balanced development of education in China. However, in the context of the rigid demand for students to make up their lessons, a one-size-fits-all approach to the teaching and training industry may lead to another kind of “unfair education”. Based on the complexity of the implementation of the “double reduction policy”, it is necessary to consider the problem from a comprehensive and dynamic perspective. It is necessary to seek effective implementation paths from the perspectives of evaluation criteria, value orientation and participants, so as to create a good education ecology.
This paper recognizes that the “double reduction policy” is an important measure to solve the problem of educational ecological imbalance from its connotation to its concept, and the implementation of the “double reduction policy” is a powerful means to achieve equitable and balanced development of education in China. However, in the context of the rigid demand for students to make up their lessons, a one-size-fits-all approach to the teaching and training industry may lead to another kind of “unfair education”. Based on the complexity of the implementation of the “double reduction policy”, it is necessary to consider the problem from a comprehensive and dynamic perspective. It is necessary to seek effective implementation paths from the perspectives of evaluation criteria, value orientation and participants, so as to create a good education ecology.
목차
1. 序言
2. 教育减负的历程与问题
3. “双减”政策的提出与实施
4. 结语：基础教育生态的治理
参考文献
논문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
中国大学会计教育环境和教授条件对教育满足度的影响: 基于教育有益的中介效应
인문사회 21
2022 .04
-
한일 ‘슬기로운 생활’과 ‘생활’의 교과 성격 변화
한국일본교육학연구
2015 .01
-
해방 이후 한국 교육정책 및 제도의 진단과 재설계방안 탐색
교육혁신연구
2016 .01
-
教育公平与高等教育资源配置效率: 资源优化还是资源浪费?
중국지역연구
2022 .11
-
[Business Point of View] 구글 폴더블폰 반전 가능할까 : 접었던 폴더블폰 다시 펴더라도…
더스쿠프
2022 .02
-
中????物消?者后悔?制度?究
동북아법연구
2021 .01
-
宮沢賢治の『ガドルフの百合』の心象スケッチ - 物理的な空間と精神的な空間 -
日本學(일본학)
2020 .01
-
시민생태 실천(Civic Ecology Practice)과 환경교육
한국환경교육학회 학술대회 자료집
2018 .06
-
중국 쌍감(双減)정책 집행과정의 패러독스 분석
교육정치학연구
2024 .03
-
日本語教育における実践研究の可能性－「台湾の日本語教育における実践研究」－
일본어교육연구
2017 .08
-
중국의 지역간 교육 불평등 추세분석(2001-2021)
동북아경제연구
2024 .08
-
[Issue & Trend] 삼성 폴더블폰 갤럭시 Z 플립 어떨까_두번째 폴더블폰도 답을 못했다
더스쿠프
2020 .03
-
펴지 못한 폴더블폰 자화상 : 에어팟은 되고 폴더블은 안 된 까닭
더스쿠프
2024 .01
-
생태전환교육과 유아교육
한국열린유아교육학회 학술대회 논문집
2024 .10
-
생태교육의 내용과 전망
홀리스틱융합교육연구
2015 .01
-
韓国と日本における在住外国人の類型と 言語教育
일본언어문화
2018 .01
-
[IT Underline] 갤럭시 S24 잇는 AI 폴더블폰의 과제 : C-폴더블폰의 달아오른 기세 꺾어라
더스쿠프
2024 .07
-
교육과정 재구성을 통한 초등 생태교육 사례 연구
한국환경교육학회 학술대회 자료집
2022 .12
-
역사교육과 ‘생태환경사’, 어떻게 풀어갈까?
역사와 교육
2023 .04
-
The Double Burden : Gender Equity and Labor Market Inequality After the One-Child Policy
한국사회학회 심포지움 논문집
2018 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-910-000320060