메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Minyoung Cho (Korea University)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.23
발행연도
2023.1
수록면
1 - 13 (13page)
DOI
10.15738/kjell.23..202301.1

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Consistent with the growing interest in positive psychology, positive emotions such as grit, resilience, and flow have gained attention in L2 research. Csikszentmihalyi’s (1990) flow refers to the optimal human experience in which one feels cognitively efficient and emotionally happy. Existing L2 research applied flow in L2 learning, yet due to the inconsistencies in conceptualization and methodology, there is a need to further explore the nature of flow. To address this gap, the present study investigates how flow is constituted by examining the underlying structures of diverse cognitive and emotional experiences of flow. It also explores how these experiences predict learners’ perceived success in classroom activities and in their learning outcomes. Forty-four college students participated in a classroom activity where they practiced English speech patterns. Once they completed the activity, they completed a questionnaire about their task experience that asked about seven dimensions of the flow experience. These were based on Csikszentmihalyi’s (1990) theorization of flow, including both cognitive and affective dimensions such as the merge of action and awareness, concentration, and intrinsic enjoyment. The learning outcome was measured via their score differences in the pretest and the posttest. The results showed that various dimensions of flow experience exist independently, which suggests the need to consider multiple sensations of flow in researching flow. Furthermore, regarding flow components and learning, the study found that only intrinsic enjoyment significantly predicted learners’ perception of their success in the activity. However, the study failed to find any components of flow that predicted learning outcomes.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussions
6. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-705-000319222