메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최은주 (University of Illinois at Chicago)
저널정보
서울대학교 행정대학원 The Korean Journal of Policy Studies Journal of Policy Studies 제37권 제3호
발행연도
2022.9
수록면
65 - 82 (18page)
DOI
10.52372/jps37304

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study explores how fiscal reserves, such as Budget Stabilization Funds (BSF) and General Fund Ending Balances (GFB), affect budget transparency and procyclical budget adjustments. To determine whether the effects of fiscal reserves depend on the types of budget actions, the study organizes budget actions according to 1) level, indicating the level at which budget actions take place, and 2) accessibility, denoting accessible budget-balancing strategies that face the least legal and political constraints. This classification of budget actions, which has not been attempted in prior research, enhances our understanding of government fiscal choices as it shows that the visibility and political costs of budget actions depend on available resources, levels, and accessibility. By using panel data from 45 US states from 2000 to 2019, the study finds that BSFs improve budget transparency, while decreasing budget cuts. The study also finds that BSF has a greater impact on budget transparency than revenue-raising actions. In contrast, an election year has a greater negative impact on budget cuts than budget transparency. These results support our classification of budget actions, predicting that budget cuts are used less in election years than in non-election years due to their visibility and political risk.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0