메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이은상 (서울대학교)
저널정보
서울대학교 아시아태평양법연구소 Journal of Korean Law Journal of Korean Law Vol.23 No.2
발행연도
2024.8
수록면
287 - 320 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article is mainly about the significance and limitations of the General Act on Public Administration (GAPA) in Korea and its impact on administrative practice. Whereas the Administrative Procedures Act is enacted and enforced as a general law governing administrative procedures in Korea, administrative substantive law has long been based primarily on uncodified sources, such as the general principles of administrative law that are formed from academic theories and precedents and exist in a scattered system of various individual statutes. In July 2019, the Ministry of Government Legislation took the initiative to enact the GAPA, which would codify the general principles of substantive law across the administrative sphere. An advisory committee was established to prepare the legislation, and in July 2020, the draft of the GAPA was submitted to the National Assembly; on March 23, 2021, the GAPA was enacted and promulgated. The enactment of the GAPA was the result of the combined efforts and experience of academia, the legal profession, and the executive branch over a period of about two years. The main contents of the GAPA are divided into the following categories according to the legislative purpose of each provision: provisions to improve the predictability of law enforcement, provisions to expand remedies for people’s rights, provisions to promote proactive administration and regulatory innovation, and provisions to improve the efficiency and uniformity of administration. The enactment of the GAPA is significant in the following respects. First, it realized the codification of administrative substantive law corresponding to the general principles of administrative law. Next, it was a starting point for the future enactment of a comprehensive general administrative code. Lastly, the enactment of the GAPA laid the foundation for the reform and development of administrative law in Korea. However, the GAPA is still incomplete as a general law on public administration, as many provisions were deleted during the legislative review process, and it needs to be amended to include additional provisions that are related to the matters that have been discussed during the draft deliberation stage and the matters to better protect the rights and interests of the public. In addition, although the procedural content of the GAPA does not directly overlap or conflict with the Administrative Procedures Act, when it comes to matters that are regulated by two separate laws, there is a problem of decentralization of regulations. There have been changes and impacts on administrative practice since the enactment and enforcement of the GAPA. First, in the legislative area, the GAPA provided the legal basis for the establishment of the National Public Administrative Legislation Committee and its continued existence, enabling it to regularly discuss the development of administrative statutes and regulations and improvements to the legal system. Next, in terms of changes in the administrative area, a behavioral norm of administrative action was established through the GAPA. Finally, in the judicial and trial areas, the Regulations on Administrative Litigation, as a Supreme Court regulation, were promulgated and enforced. The GAPA played the role of an adjudicatory norm in cases that have been filed to argue for the illegality of an administrative action, citing the relevant provisions of the GAPA as grounds for it. It will be necessary to continuously review the existing provisions of the GAPA that have been pointed out for improvement, to supplement and re-legislate those that have been eliminated during the draft deliberation stage of the GAPA, and to make additional amendments to protect the rights and interests of the public and improve the appropriateness of administration. Promoting the integrated codification of administrative law after the enactment and implementation of the GAPA is also a major challenge.
#General Act on Public Administration #Administrative Procedures Act #Regulations on Administrative Litigation #codification #administrative law

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0