메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 역사교육 제79집
발행연도
2001.9
수록면
27 - 56 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The division between East Group and West Group and the making of the two factions(1575) are accepted as a turning point in the political history of the Chosun dynasty. The situation was caused by the personal enmity of the two politicians, Shim, Eui-Gyeom and Kim, Hyo-Won. It is recognized that the former person represented the established power and the latter the rising power. And some nowaday scholars have tried to explain the situation by arguing that the each one represented the opposite inclination. Doubting these explanations I try to research the real situation and the relationship of the two politicians in this article. This analysis is essential in order to understand the factional politics or the politics of literati after king Seon-Jo.
Shim, Eui-Gyeom was a relative of the queen but didn't behave like an autocratic lord. Moreover he protected the new literati from the oppression in the later period of king Myeong-Jong. In stead of these facts, he depended on the relativity of the royal family in order to reform the rotten bureaucracy. This action was hated by the young literati and he was accepted as a factional leader by them. Concerning the problem of recommendation for a magistrate, there is no certain evidence that Shim had opposed the promotion of Kim to a higher magistrate. Kim's comrades only guessed the delay of his recommendation had been caused by the opposite faction, the West Group. On the other side, it was possible that the recommendation of Shim, Chung-Gyeom to that magistrate might be cancelled by Kim, Hyo-Won, for the former one was a relative of the queen. But there's no evidence that Kim participated in that action positively. Nevertheless the two factions had in mind commonly that the other faction tried to do harm to their own faction and blamed the other without recognizing the merits or the achievements of the other side. Later Shim, Eu-gyeom and Kim, Hyo-won were degraded to provincial magistrates and had no opportunities to lead the faction in the capital. But they were blamed as the first factionalists. In sum the obstinate opposition and some misconceptions were the causes of the first factional division of the Chosun Dynasty.

목차

1. 序言
2. 靑松 沈氏 家門과 沈義謙의 두 측면
3. 沈義謙ㆍ金孝元의 갈등 요인 검토
4. 結語
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015490342