인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
The division between East Group and West Group and the making of the two factions(1575) are accepted as a turning point in the political history of the Chosun dynasty. The situation was caused by the personal enmity of the two politicians, Shim, Eui-Gyeom and Kim, Hyo-Won. It is recognized that the former person represented the established power and the latter the rising power. And some nowaday scholars have tried to explain the situation by arguing that the each one represented the opposite inclination. Doubting these explanations I try to research the real situation and the relationship of the two politicians in this article. This analysis is essential in order to understand the factional politics or the politics of literati after king Seon-Jo.
Shim, Eui-Gyeom was a relative of the queen but didn't behave like an autocratic lord. Moreover he protected the new literati from the oppression in the later period of king Myeong-Jong. In stead of these facts, he depended on the relativity of the royal family in order to reform the rotten bureaucracy. This action was hated by the young literati and he was accepted as a factional leader by them. Concerning the problem of recommendation for a magistrate, there is no certain evidence that Shim had opposed the promotion of Kim to a higher magistrate. Kim's comrades only guessed the delay of his recommendation had been caused by the opposite faction, the West Group. On the other side, it was possible that the recommendation of Shim, Chung-Gyeom to that magistrate might be cancelled by Kim, Hyo-Won, for the former one was a relative of the queen. But there's no evidence that Kim participated in that action positively. Nevertheless the two factions had in mind commonly that the other faction tried to do harm to their own faction and blamed the other without recognizing the merits or the achievements of the other side. Later Shim, Eu-gyeom and Kim, Hyo-won were degraded to provincial magistrates and had no opportunities to lead the faction in the capital. But they were blamed as the first factionalists. In sum the obstinate opposition and some misconceptions were the causes of the first factional division of the Chosun Dynasty.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지Shim, Eui-Gyeom was a relative of the queen but didn't behave like an autocratic lord. Moreover he protected the new literati from the oppression in the later period of king Myeong-Jong. In stead of these facts, he depended on the relativity of the royal family in order to reform the rotten bureaucracy. This action was hated by the young literati and he was accepted as a factional leader by them. Concerning the problem of recommendation for a magistrate, there is no certain evidence that Shim had opposed the promotion of Kim to a higher magistrate. Kim's comrades only guessed the delay of his recommendation had been caused by the opposite faction, the West Group. On the other side, it was possible that the recommendation of Shim, Chung-Gyeom to that magistrate might be cancelled by Kim, Hyo-Won, for the former one was a relative of the queen. But there's no evidence that Kim participated in that action positively. Nevertheless the two factions had in mind commonly that the other faction tried to do harm to their own faction and blamed the other without recognizing the merits or the achievements of the other side. Later Shim, Eu-gyeom and Kim, Hyo-won were degraded to provincial magistrates and had no opportunities to lead the faction in the capital. But they were blamed as the first factionalists. In sum the obstinate opposition and some misconceptions were the causes of the first factional division of the Chosun Dynasty.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 序言
- 2. 靑松 沈氏 家門과 沈義謙의 두 측면
- 3. 沈義謙ㆍ金孝元의 갈등 요인 검토
- 4. 結語
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015490342
