지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis is a research about a myth to establish of Bakjae. Bakje, one of the ancient country, has influenced Korea and Japan even nowadays. Still a myth to establish of Bakjae is to be dosed to a record of history. Even we have suspected that Onzo is a man who establish of Bakjae, because the record are different among the history books.
This research has summarized as follows.
First, it researched ceremony for ancestor of head to Bakjae, because we can search ceremony type from influence of a myth of establish country. Therefore I researched that if a myth of King Dongmyeng was to establish of Bakjae to reconstruct about ceremony type for ancestor of head to establish country. Especially I researched that it is possible a myth of King Dongmyeng was borrowed to yth of establish country by genealogy of Onzo who won genealogy of Bilye.
Second, Bakjae has history that the 21th of Bakjae King, Kearo, was defeated and died by Jangsu, one of the Kokuye, so ruined Hansung as capital. So Bakjae cound't borrow myth of King Dongmyeng to Kokuye to hostile nation. Therefore it appeared Kutae and Domosul (또는 theory of Kutae and Domo) as a head of establish country that recorded foreign history books.
Third, King Munju who has transferred capital borrowed legend of Komnaru, one of the myth of native power, for cooperation. But it was weak that myth of tragedy, because it accepted history about transferred capital to Buyeu and ruin of Bakjae.
Fourth, myth of age of Sabe was thought genealogy Buyeu that had royal authority, or legend of Yaraeza that cooperate with Buyeu. This can confirm myth of bith of Kyenhuen, that assisted to continued Bakhjae.
I think that myth to establish of Bakjae has accepted different myth by age and place. Therefore I think that Bakjae has accepted many different myth, because of weakness of royal authority to change the absolute power and tragedy of ruined country.
This research has summarized as follows.
First, it researched ceremony for ancestor of head to Bakjae, because we can search ceremony type from influence of a myth of establish country. Therefore I researched that if a myth of King Dongmyeng was to establish of Bakjae to reconstruct about ceremony type for ancestor of head to establish country. Especially I researched that it is possible a myth of King Dongmyeng was borrowed to yth of establish country by genealogy of Onzo who won genealogy of Bilye.
Second, Bakjae has history that the 21th of Bakjae King, Kearo, was defeated and died by Jangsu, one of the Kokuye, so ruined Hansung as capital. So Bakjae cound't borrow myth of King Dongmyeng to Kokuye to hostile nation. Therefore it appeared Kutae and Domosul (또는 theory of Kutae and Domo) as a head of establish country that recorded foreign history books.
Third, King Munju who has transferred capital borrowed legend of Komnaru, one of the myth of native power, for cooperation. But it was weak that myth of tragedy, because it accepted history about transferred capital to Buyeu and ruin of Bakjae.
Fourth, myth of age of Sabe was thought genealogy Buyeu that had royal authority, or legend of Yaraeza that cooperate with Buyeu. This can confirm myth of bith of Kyenhuen, that assisted to continued Bakhjae.
I think that myth to establish of Bakjae has accepted different myth by age and place. Therefore I think that Bakjae has accepted many different myth, because of weakness of royal authority to change the absolute power and tragedy of ruined country.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 백제의 초기의 동명신화
Ⅲ. 한성 몰락 직후의 백제신화
Ⅳ. 웅진시대의 백제신화
Ⅴ. 사비시대 백제신화
Ⅵ. 결론
〔참고문헌〕
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
식민지시대의 한국 신화의 위상
비평문학
2009 .03
-
한ㆍ중 건국 시조신화 비교 연구 : 상고시대 신화를 중심으로
우리말글
2008 .08
-
신화(myth)와 철학
철학연구
1987 .06
-
중국의 신화와 역사 : 고대 왕조신화의 역사화를 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .03
-
탈가부장적 신화 읽기의 전략들 : 텍스트의 전복, 해체, 확장
종교문화연구
2015 .12
-
올바른 정체성 형성을 위한 신화 식별 방법론 고찰
연세상담코칭연구
2015 .03
-
류큐 국왕 신화의 문헌 기록과 구비 전승
인문과학연구
2014 .09
-
맥락적 해석에 의한 김알지 신화와 신라문화의 정체성 재인식
비교민속학
2007 .02
-
고조선과 고구려 건국신화의 구조주의적 분석
국학연구
2011 .06
-
신화 이해의 역사적 변천 : 북한의 경우를 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .03
-
석가 · 미륵 투쟁신화와 힌두신화의 한 유형 : 비교론적 관점에서
비교민속학
2007 .02
-
서사무가를 통해 본 한국 신화의 시간인식체계 연구
겨레어문학
2014 .01
-
中國神話의 歷史化에 관한 試論
중국어문학논집
2002 .06
-
단군신화와 서양신화의 비교연구 : 여성학적 해석을 중심으로
종교문화연구
2002 .10
-
신화ㆍ역사ㆍ아이덴티티 : 일본 記紀神話의 古層
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .03
-
중국 소수민족의 주요 創世神話에 보이는 천지형상과 補天神話의 연구
중국어문논역총간
2016 .07
-
The Myth of Tan`gun : A Dramatic Structural Analysis of a Korean Foundation Myth
Korea Journal
1997 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-380-017626008