지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, the logic and mentality that existed behind the pro-Japanese position which prevailed during the 1930s and '40s are examined, through the literary works published in the popular magazine 『Samcheon-ri(三千里)』, of which publication was overseen by a pro-Japanese intellectual named Kim Dong Hwan. The pro-Japanese arguments that we can find inside 『Samcheon-ri』 display a tone which was significantly enforced and aggressively expressed with tile breakout of tile war. Added to that, a specific kind of perception of tile world, a position supporting modernization, and also a view upon the issue of people(nation), all being products of tile modem days of Korea, can be found behind such pro-Japanese arguments. The perception of tile world exhibited in 『Samcheon-ri』was based upon Social Darwinism, while the cause of modemization was based upon the idea of Korea's subordinacy to Japan and also a certain level of 'Asian-ism' supporting tile idea of 'cooperations' between East Asian countries, and the view upon tile nation supported the idea of the Korean people and the Korean nation being 'assimilated' into Japan.
From a Social Darwin-ist viewpoint to perceive the world, and from an attitude that supported the concept of 'subordinate modernization", Japan's war was considered as a noble war waged out of a grand vision determined to develop itself to become a stronger state and also a modernly civilized nation. And at the same time, the idea of 'developing' Joseon as a supposedly 'economic partner' of Japan, was justified and supported as well. Also, the meaningful existence of Joseon was only granted and acknowledged 'conceptually' inside the 'East Asian Cooperative block' with Japan at its center. Japan had been reshaping Asia since the 19th century, and under such sentiment (of the Japanese people), Koreans were forced to cooperate with the system.
In the meantime, the argument of 'the Japanese inland and the Joseon peninsula as one', which surfaced after the Sino-Japanese war ended, was an argument inherently Fascist in nature, as it supported the idea of forming a 'Mega-state unbounded by and also transcending Nationalism', which also imagined Joseon shattering its national boundaries and joining the 'Japanese state' inside the 'East Asian Cooperative block' as a legitimate part of it. This argument of 'Japan and Joseon as one' displayed racism and state-ism merged with each other, and it was also related to the 'Assimilation argument', which was the primary position of the Japanese colonial rulers as well.
With the war heating up, the editors of 『Samcheon-ri』magazine, in their efforts to achieve the objective making 'Japan and Joseon as one', encouraged the Korean people to brush up their patriotism and spreaded totalitarian national sentiments throughout the Korean population, through emphasizing the merits of a reactionary spirit honoring militalism(尙武) and propagating the 'rural qualities'. In the wake of ever elevating wartime mobilization in the 1940s, such efforts manifested themselves in the form of campaigns("New System Movement") launched by the Joseon Governor General office, which promoted local artistic activities, agricultural entertainment and the honoring of local traditions, In such campaigns, things that were Joseon and things that were local in nature were promoted to a certain extent, yet such concept of 'localism' denoted no other man regional qualities 'conceptualized' inside the supposed 'Great state of Japan', and as a result, such concept carne to generate abundantly colonial nuances. In the end, what was promoted as 'national(Korean)', was in fact most anti-national in nature, and anti-Korean in nature as well.
From a Social Darwin-ist viewpoint to perceive the world, and from an attitude that supported the concept of 'subordinate modernization", Japan's war was considered as a noble war waged out of a grand vision determined to develop itself to become a stronger state and also a modernly civilized nation. And at the same time, the idea of 'developing' Joseon as a supposedly 'economic partner' of Japan, was justified and supported as well. Also, the meaningful existence of Joseon was only granted and acknowledged 'conceptually' inside the 'East Asian Cooperative block' with Japan at its center. Japan had been reshaping Asia since the 19th century, and under such sentiment (of the Japanese people), Koreans were forced to cooperate with the system.
In the meantime, the argument of 'the Japanese inland and the Joseon peninsula as one', which surfaced after the Sino-Japanese war ended, was an argument inherently Fascist in nature, as it supported the idea of forming a 'Mega-state unbounded by and also transcending Nationalism', which also imagined Joseon shattering its national boundaries and joining the 'Japanese state' inside the 'East Asian Cooperative block' as a legitimate part of it. This argument of 'Japan and Joseon as one' displayed racism and state-ism merged with each other, and it was also related to the 'Assimilation argument', which was the primary position of the Japanese colonial rulers as well.
With the war heating up, the editors of 『Samcheon-ri』magazine, in their efforts to achieve the objective making 'Japan and Joseon as one', encouraged the Korean people to brush up their patriotism and spreaded totalitarian national sentiments throughout the Korean population, through emphasizing the merits of a reactionary spirit honoring militalism(尙武) and propagating the 'rural qualities'. In the wake of ever elevating wartime mobilization in the 1940s, such efforts manifested themselves in the form of campaigns("New System Movement") launched by the Joseon Governor General office, which promoted local artistic activities, agricultural entertainment and the honoring of local traditions, In such campaigns, things that were Joseon and things that were local in nature were promoted to a certain extent, yet such concept of 'localism' denoted no other man regional qualities 'conceptualized' inside the supposed 'Great state of Japan', and as a result, such concept carne to generate abundantly colonial nuances. In the end, what was promoted as 'national(Korean)', was in fact most anti-national in nature, and anti-Korean in nature as well.
목차
머리말
1. ‘삼천리’에서 ‘대동아’로
2. 전쟁과 체제협력론
3. 내선일체론과 파시즘 민족 정서
맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘국민문학’의 기획과 ‘신지방주의’론 - 김종한, 최재서를 중심으로
현대소설연구
2020 .06
-
Man and Nature
인간연구
2017 .01
-
심종문 湘西 문학세계가 지닌 생태여성주의의 가능성
중국문화연구
2016 .11
-
해방기 시문학과 민족 담론의 재배치
한국시학연구
2009 .08
-
신명기 역사에 나타난 지역주의 극복과 대구,경북교회
한국기독교신학논총
2004 .01
-
The Nature and Process of the Korean National Liberation Movement during the Japanese Colonial Period
Korea Journal
1996 .03
-
1930년대 조선문화의 정체성과 로컬 ‘향토’의 상상
어문연구
2009 .01
-
친일미청산의 역사와 친일의 내적 논리
통일인문학
2018 .12
-
일제하 조선인 군수의 사회적 위상과 현실 인식 : 1920~30년대를 중심으로
역사와현실
2007 .03
-
친일파시즘문학의 숭고 미학적 연구
어문학
2009 .06
-
친일파시즘문학과 전통주의
우리말글
2009 .12
-
식민지기 전통도시 순천의 근대화 과정과 지역민의 대응
한국사학보
2011 .02
-
일제하의 지방통치 시스템과 군 단위 ‘관료-유지 지배체제’ : 윤해동 저, 『지배와 자치』(역사비평사, 2006)에 대한 논평
역사와현실
2007 .03
-
21세기 민족문화진흥의 새로운 모색을 위한 제언
국학연구
2006 .06
-
[특집/친일문학] 친일문학의 역사철학적 맥락
한국근대문학연구
2003 .04
-
Nationalism and National Identity in the East Asian Perspective
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2005 .06
-
일제의 불교정책과 친일불교의 양상
불교학보
2008 .02
-
대한제국기 일본 유학생들의 유학생활과 유학의식 : 1900년대 일본유학생들의 ‘일본론’을 중심으로
역사와실학
2015 .08
-
한국 고전문학의 지역성과 세계성
어문연구
2009 .01
-
한민족공동체와 민족문화동질성 : 다문화주의(multiculturalism)적 접근
고조선단군학
2005 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0