지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Iljin-hwe was organized by an alliance between the remaining Dong'hak members who were never part of the mainstream Korean society, and the Jung'in("middle class") members who once belonged to the late Independence Society('Dokrib Hyeob'hwe'). In order to overcome their own political and societal limitations, they engaged themselves in certain pro-Japanese activities since the early days of the Iljin-hwe's formation, and with the Japanese authorities' support they became a prominent political faction when the protectorate ruling began.
Yet the Japanese authorities' strategy of a protectorate ruling was aimed at managing the Korean society as stable as possible, in order to reduce the overall cost of the impending annexation. To do that they had to garner the support of the Yangban ruling class and maintain the existing ruling structure inside Joseon, instead of only utilizing the Iljin-hwe organization which was never part of the social majority and also a body that symbolized conflicts.
So, Iljin-hwe came to find itself in sort of a dilemma. They had established their political footing by assuming a pro-Japanee stance, yet before fully consolidating such position they were finding themselves getting increasingly isolated inside the Korean society. In order to escape the protectorate ruling phase which would not allow the Iljin-hwe members to gain stronger political influence, they allied themselves with the mainland personnel and the military, and started to promote the invitation to annexation.
As their movement to support annexation was born out of their need to escape isolation, their logic of promoting annexation also emphasized the 'distrustful nature' of the Korean society and 'negative prospects' of the Koreans' capability to stand on their own. Iljin-hwe promoted their ultimate objective as 'protecting the lives and properties of the people,' yet they also believed that they would have to teach, enlighten and civilize the people. And when such people showed a hostile attitude toward them, they started to argue that it was an impossible task to enlighten the Korean people and therefore the Korean people could never possibly establish their own national state. They claimed they were being isolated within the Korean society as the Korean society itself was incompetent and very much dependent. They were condemning the Korean people for not having a backbone. To them, the foundation of a national state only meant a state with themselves placed in power. When that became rather impossible, they came to argue that Korea's incorporation into the Japanese empire was the ultimate elevation to a modernized state.
Yet the Japanese authorities' strategy of a protectorate ruling was aimed at managing the Korean society as stable as possible, in order to reduce the overall cost of the impending annexation. To do that they had to garner the support of the Yangban ruling class and maintain the existing ruling structure inside Joseon, instead of only utilizing the Iljin-hwe organization which was never part of the social majority and also a body that symbolized conflicts.
So, Iljin-hwe came to find itself in sort of a dilemma. They had established their political footing by assuming a pro-Japanee stance, yet before fully consolidating such position they were finding themselves getting increasingly isolated inside the Korean society. In order to escape the protectorate ruling phase which would not allow the Iljin-hwe members to gain stronger political influence, they allied themselves with the mainland personnel and the military, and started to promote the invitation to annexation.
As their movement to support annexation was born out of their need to escape isolation, their logic of promoting annexation also emphasized the 'distrustful nature' of the Korean society and 'negative prospects' of the Koreans' capability to stand on their own. Iljin-hwe promoted their ultimate objective as 'protecting the lives and properties of the people,' yet they also believed that they would have to teach, enlighten and civilize the people. And when such people showed a hostile attitude toward them, they started to argue that it was an impossible task to enlighten the Korean people and therefore the Korean people could never possibly establish their own national state. They claimed they were being isolated within the Korean society as the Korean society itself was incompetent and very much dependent. They were condemning the Korean people for not having a backbone. To them, the foundation of a national state only meant a state with themselves placed in power. When that became rather impossible, they came to argue that Korea's incorporation into the Japanese empire was the ultimate elevation to a modernized state.
목차
서론
1. 이토 히로부미(伊藤博文)의 ‘보호통치‘ 구상과 정국운영전략
2. 일진회의 ‘보호통치‘ 인식과 ‘합방론‘의 제기
3. ‘합방론‘의 논리와 인민인식
결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
을사조약 이후 일본의 ‘보호국’ 인식
역사와현실
2007 .12
-
일제 강제병합 이데올로기와 식민지교육정책
한국독립운동사연구
2011 .08
-
『국민신보』를 통해 본 일진회의 합방론과 합방정국의 동향
역사와현실
2008 .09
-
한국 강제병합 100년과 일본 사회의 동향
동북아역사논총
2011 .12
-
고려 중ㆍ후기 기로회(耆老會)와 개경(開京) 사대부(士大夫) 사회
역사와현실
2011 .03
-
Several Present Conditions Defining 100 Years of Japan’s Annexation of Korea
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
한일합병과 시선의 정치학 : 근대일본제국의 시각문화와 만화매체
동양사학연구
2005 .12
-
근대 계몽기 한국과 일본 지식인의 ‘보호국론’ 비교 연구
동북아역사논총
2009 .06
-
The Centennial of Japan’s Annexation of Korea : Rethinking Annexation and Postcolonial Legacy
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
‘병합사안’을 통해본 한국병합 인식 : 나카이 기타로(中井喜太郎)를 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2007 .08
-
Characteristics of Japan’s Annexation of Korea and the Japanese Colonial System : A Comparison of Korean and Taiwanese Legislation System
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
金允植의 外交論에 대한 國際法的 검토
한국인물사연구
2015 .09
-
The Illegality of the Forced Treaties Leading to Japan`s Annexation of the Great Han Empire : A Discussion of Japan`s Annexation of Korea in Terms of Its Illegality
Korea Journal
1996 .12
-
‘한국병합’에 대한 재한일본 언론의 동향 : 잡지 『朝鮮』을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2010 .12
-
Discussions Concerning the Legality of the 1910 “Annexation” of Korea by Japan
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
The Japanese Annexation of Korea as Viewed from the British and American Press : focus on The Times and The New York Times
International Journal of Korean History
2011 .08
-
‘한국 강제병합’ 100년 일본역사학의 동향과 전망
한국사학보
2011 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003773834