지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Kim Yun-Sik(1835~1922) is treated as a member of the Progressive group in the study of the modern Korean history. He was most acquainted with diplomatic affairs among other Progressive group members. In 1882, he had led the establishment of the Joseon-America Treaty. Later, he took office as Minister of the Department of Foreign Affairs from December 1884 to June 1887 and from June 1894 to February 1896. Lastly, until he passed away in 1922, he was incessantly interested in the Protection, Annexation, and Independence of his nation.
His theory of diplomacy is represented by his “Theory of serving two ends (兩得論)”. The gist of the theory is that “If Joseon(朝鮮) remains as a subject state(屬邦) of the Qing(淸) but is sovereign(自主) with respect to other nations, it can serve two ends since it does not lose sovereign right and does not betray her feudal duty for Qing”.
This almost literally agrees with Qing’s Li Hong-zhang’s “Theory of subject state with sovereignty(屬邦自主論)”. However, appearing to say the ‘sovereignty’ of Joseon, Li in fact pursued Joseon’s status as a dependent/semi-sovereign state (屬國 · 半主之國) in accordance with Elements of International Law(萬國公法).
Kim believed that a traditional subject state(屬邦) could retain its sovereignty but a modern dependent state(屬國) couldn’t. However, with the status as a dependent/semi-sovereign state, which Li Hongzhang pursued, Joseon can retain her rights, though limitedly, such as rights of negotiation and treaties and of legation according to Elements of International Law. Thus, a ‘modern dependent state without sovereignty’ did not exist based on the international law.
In the same logic, ‘a traditional subject state with guaranteed sovereignty’ was difficult to expect at that time considering the fact that Qing tried to take Joseon as her dependent/semi-sovereign state based on the international law. Accordingly, we can see that it was meaningless to distinguish between a modern dependent state and a traditional subject state.
His theory of diplomacy is represented by his “Theory of serving two ends (兩得論)”. The gist of the theory is that “If Joseon(朝鮮) remains as a subject state(屬邦) of the Qing(淸) but is sovereign(自主) with respect to other nations, it can serve two ends since it does not lose sovereign right and does not betray her feudal duty for Qing”.
This almost literally agrees with Qing’s Li Hong-zhang’s “Theory of subject state with sovereignty(屬邦自主論)”. However, appearing to say the ‘sovereignty’ of Joseon, Li in fact pursued Joseon’s status as a dependent/semi-sovereign state (屬國 · 半主之國) in accordance with Elements of International Law(萬國公法).
Kim believed that a traditional subject state(屬邦) could retain its sovereignty but a modern dependent state(屬國) couldn’t. However, with the status as a dependent/semi-sovereign state, which Li Hongzhang pursued, Joseon can retain her rights, though limitedly, such as rights of negotiation and treaties and of legation according to Elements of International Law. Thus, a ‘modern dependent state without sovereignty’ did not exist based on the international law.
In the same logic, ‘a traditional subject state with guaranteed sovereignty’ was difficult to expect at that time considering the fact that Qing tried to take Joseon as her dependent/semi-sovereign state based on the international law. Accordingly, we can see that it was meaningless to distinguish between a modern dependent state and a traditional subject state.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말-개화파 분류 문제 및 외교론과 관련하여
Ⅱ. 개항 이후 조선의 屬國 · 半主之國의 국제법적 지위 획득과 김윤식의 수용
Ⅲ. 청일전쟁 이후 조선의 獨立 · 保護 · 倂合 문제에 대한 김윤식의 인식
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
불교위경의 정치적 특징에 대한 재고 －인도·중국불교의 통섭적 이해의 도모－
종교연구
2020 .08
-
주권적 개인은 니체주의적 경합적 민주주의의 주체인가?
시대와 철학
2024 .06
-
雲養 金允植 散文의 表現 技法 硏究
어문연구
2018 .01
-
1880년대 전반 조선의 서구적 교섭(交涉) 개념 수용과 통리교섭통상사무아문 정비 -김윤식(金允植)의 대외인식변화와 활동을 중심으로-
역사와현실
2024 .12
-
Volatile Biopolitics : Postwar Korean Cinema’s Bodily Encounter with the Cold War
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2015 .06
-
운양(雲養) 김윤식(金允植)의 제주 유배일기 고찰 - 『속음청사(續陰晴史)』를 중심으로
해양문화재
2021 .12
-
헤겔의 『법철학』에서 국제법과 국제관계
철학
2021 .11
-
김윤식의 1960년대 시론에 관한 연구 - 뉴크리티시즘 이론의 딜레마와 ‘혼(魂)’적인 시에 관한 재고찰을 중심으로
한국현대문학연구
2024 .12
-
김윤식의 1970년대 시론(詩論) 연구
춘원연구학보
2024 .06
-
《漢武帝內傳》에 반영된 君主觀
중국어문논역총간
2016 .01
-
한국과 조선: 한조관계의 역사·이론·방향 - 남북관계의 종식을 위하여
동방학지
2020 .01
-
The Author of Sovereign Violence Responds to Book Review : Sovereign Violence: Ethics and South Korean Cinema in the New Millennium. By Steve Choe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2016. 352 pages. ISBN: 9789089646385
Korea Journal
2021 .06
-
유형원 연구의 시각과 『반계수록』 읽기의 방향
한국실학연구
2022 .06
-
『논어』 ‘북신(北辰)과 뭇별(衆星)’의 비유를 통해 본 정약용의 유위론
동양철학연구
2021 .11
-
1882년 조약･장정의 체결과 속국(屬國)･반주지국(半主之國) 조선의 국제법적 지위
역사와현실
2016 .03
-
2024년 비상계엄, 인민주권의 파괴 시도를 어떻게 서술할 것인가? - 주권의 소재를 둘러싼 정당성에 대한 역사인식을 위하여
역사비평
2025 .02
-
친청에서 친일로, 시세에 조응한 김윤식
한국사학보
2022 .02
-
패전 직후의 일본의 사회문화상 : 다자이 오사무(太宰治)의 후기작품을 중심으로
일본문화학보
2018 .08
-
‘조러밀약(朝露密約)’을 통한 고종의 대러관계 강화 시도와 의미 - 고종의 보호국 인식을 중심으로
역사와현실
2022 .12
-
1910년대 한국 독립운동과 몽골 -김규식의 활동을 중심으로-
한국독립운동사연구
2022 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-051-001944518