개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to make claims as follows. First, the syntactic category of ‘-i-’ in ‘-ida’ construction is verb; second, the morphological category of ‘-i-’ is suffix; third, ‘-i-’ is polysemous; fourth, among listemes saved on a long-term basis in lexicon, it becomes a syntactic atom, i.e., a word that is a productive linguistic unit (here as ‘-i-’) that can be combined with syntactically complex units, and can be directly used in syntax online; fifth, a word formed by so called syntactic word formation via head movement is in fact an ‘ecel(Gram)’. Gram is not a syntactic unit, but a morphological unit.
It seems not too far from the truth to say that the recent debates of ‘-ida’ construction is not as much about describing grammatical facts, but so much about the coalitions of grammatical perspectives.
In chapter 3, I pointed out that the syntactic derivation suffix theory has considerably distorted native speakers’ intuition about the concept of Korean word. And I also pointed out the syntactic word formation is not in fact a word formation, but a Gram formation. Since a Gram cannot be a syntactic unit, consequently, it cannot be formed in syntax. A Gram may not be formed in the lexicon either; as it is a complex unit that contains highly productive constituents. Therefore, a Gram needs not be saved, and cannot be saved in the lexicon. One alternative component to take charge with Gram formation may be morphology which takes charge of word formation and word analyses.
In chapter 4, I have defined ‘-i-’’s morphological category as agglutinant suffix. According to it, Korean, as one of agglutinative languages, cannot have declensional suffixes, and ‘-i-’ in ‘-ida’ cannot be a derivational suffix, either; but it is just an agglutinant suffix that has [+dependency] feature, as a result, that must agglutinate to the preceding elements.
In sum, in order to accordingly deal with ‘-ida’ construction, we need to re-define the fundamental units of syntax, morphology, and semantics, respectively. In addition, we may forsake the idea that the input of one grammatical unit be the output of another grammatical unit.
It seems not too far from the truth to say that the recent debates of ‘-ida’ construction is not as much about describing grammatical facts, but so much about the coalitions of grammatical perspectives.
In chapter 3, I pointed out that the syntactic derivation suffix theory has considerably distorted native speakers’ intuition about the concept of Korean word. And I also pointed out the syntactic word formation is not in fact a word formation, but a Gram formation. Since a Gram cannot be a syntactic unit, consequently, it cannot be formed in syntax. A Gram may not be formed in the lexicon either; as it is a complex unit that contains highly productive constituents. Therefore, a Gram needs not be saved, and cannot be saved in the lexicon. One alternative component to take charge with Gram formation may be morphology which takes charge of word formation and word analyses.
In chapter 4, I have defined ‘-i-’’s morphological category as agglutinant suffix. According to it, Korean, as one of agglutinative languages, cannot have declensional suffixes, and ‘-i-’ in ‘-ida’ cannot be a derivational suffix, either; but it is just an agglutinant suffix that has [+dependency] feature, as a result, that must agglutinate to the preceding elements.
In sum, in order to accordingly deal with ‘-ida’ construction, we need to re-define the fundamental units of syntax, morphology, and semantics, respectively. In addition, we may forsake the idea that the input of one grammatical unit be the output of another grammatical unit.
목차
1. 서론
2. ‘이다’ 구문의 유형 문제
3. ‘이’의 통사 범주는 용언이다
4. ‘이’의 형태 범주는 접사다
5. ‘이’의 의미 범주는 두 자리 서술어이다
6. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
THE MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX OF THE PASSIVE CONSTRUCTION IN NUUCHAHNULTH
언어학
2009 .08
-
Development of the Grammatical Voice in Korean : with the case of the suffix -i
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .11
-
형식동사 '이다'의 문법
어학연구
2002 .09
-
단어를 다시 정의해야 하는 시급한 이유들
언어
2009 .09
-
Quantitative Research on Suffixes and Grammatical Patterns in Present-day Korean
어학연구
2001 .06
-
Derivational Suffixes of Korean Verbs
언어과학연구
1983 .12
-
한국어교육 문법에서의 ‘이다’의 범주 설정과 제시 방안
한국어학
2020 .05
-
An N-gram Analysis of Asian Learners’ Writing: Focusing on Grammatical and Functional Perspectives
언어과학
2017 .01
-
파생어 형성 과정의 형태론적 기술- 후기중세국어의 ‘-기’를 중심으로
어문연구
2009 .01
-
接尾辞｢―いい｣の意味用法について
외국학연구
2013 .01
-
한국어 문법 교육에서 ‘이다’와 관련한 몇 가지 문제: 학습자를 위한 문법 기술의 관점에서
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
Significance Test of N-grams Using Bi-grams and χ2-test
영어학연구
2020 .01
-
한국어와 영어의 명사 형성 접미사 비교 및 대조
이중언어학
2004 .01
-
수 분류사 구성과 파생접사 결합형의 구조와 기능
한국어학
2011 .11
-
기능 중심 한국어 통사론의 모색- 새로운 한국어 문법 체계 정립을 위한 시론 -
한말연구
2018 .01
-
The Need For Grammatical Relations And Syntactic Levels
언어
1985 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-018276709