지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examined changes in Korea China relationship in the 19t<SUP>th</SUP> century by analyzing the proceedings of legal cases between Koreans and Chinese in Korea (Chosun or the Daehan Empire) before and after the Sino Japanese War. Among the legal cases, murder cases were selected from cases before the Sino Japanese War and from those after, and their proceedings and results were examined.
First, the legal ground of the proceedings of legal cases before the Sino Japanese War was stipulated in Article 2 of the Regulations for Maritime and Overland Trade between Chinese and Korean Subjects established in August 1882. According to the regulations, if a Chinese was the defendant and a Korean was the plaintiff in a case that had happened in Korea, the offender was to be arrested and tried by the Chinese Trade Commissioner (a diplomatic mission equivalent to a consul). If a Chinese was the plaintiff and a Korean was the defendant, the offender was to be arrested by the Korean government and delivered to the Chinese Trade Commissioner and to be investigated and tried jointly by the two countries. In Korea, accordingly, China was authorized to rule cases in which the defendant was a Chinese and the plaintiff was a Korean by itself, and those in which the defendant was a Korean and the plaintiff was a Chinese jointly with the Korean government.
Next, the legal ground for the proceedings of legal cases after the Sino Japanese War was stipulated in Article 5 of the Treaty of Commerce between Korea and China concluded in September 1899. According to the treaty, if a Chinese was the defendant and a Korean was the plaintiff in a case that had happened in Korea, the case was tried by the Chinese Consul and a Korean official could attend the trial as an observer on behalf of the plaintiff. If a Korean was the defendant and a Chinese was the plaintiff, the case was tried by a Korean judge and a Chinese official could attend the trial. The observer was guaranteed to question or cross question witnesses and to argue against unfair judgments.
For the case that a Chinese was murdered in Korea before the Sino Japanese War (the murder case of Chinese merchant Cho hale In), a Chinese official tried jointly with a Korean official, and for the case that a Korean was murdered (the assault and murder of Korean solider Lee Deok Myeong), the Chinese suspect was protected actively by the Chinese agency. On the contrary, the Korean government delivered the Korean criminal for the murder of a Chinese to the Chinese agency and had to try him jointly with the Chinese official, and could not raise any objection to the result of the trial of the Chinese offender in a murder case of a Korean. When a Korean woman (Kang) was murdered by a Chinese in Korea after the Sino
Japanese War, the Chinese Consul protected the offender strictly under the according to defendant's nationality principle of the Consul's jurisdiction regardless of the Korean observer's opinion. On the contrary, when a Chinese was murdered (the assault and murder case of Chinese seaman in Hae Zu), the Korean government sent an observer, but had little influence on the consequence of the trial. This situation was much different from that before the Sino Japanese War. However, the new Korea China relationship after the Sino Japanese War ended up as a mere short term 'experiment' due to change in Korea Japan relationship.
First, the legal ground of the proceedings of legal cases before the Sino Japanese War was stipulated in Article 2 of the Regulations for Maritime and Overland Trade between Chinese and Korean Subjects established in August 1882. According to the regulations, if a Chinese was the defendant and a Korean was the plaintiff in a case that had happened in Korea, the offender was to be arrested and tried by the Chinese Trade Commissioner (a diplomatic mission equivalent to a consul). If a Chinese was the plaintiff and a Korean was the defendant, the offender was to be arrested by the Korean government and delivered to the Chinese Trade Commissioner and to be investigated and tried jointly by the two countries. In Korea, accordingly, China was authorized to rule cases in which the defendant was a Chinese and the plaintiff was a Korean by itself, and those in which the defendant was a Korean and the plaintiff was a Chinese jointly with the Korean government.
Next, the legal ground for the proceedings of legal cases after the Sino Japanese War was stipulated in Article 5 of the Treaty of Commerce between Korea and China concluded in September 1899. According to the treaty, if a Chinese was the defendant and a Korean was the plaintiff in a case that had happened in Korea, the case was tried by the Chinese Consul and a Korean official could attend the trial as an observer on behalf of the plaintiff. If a Korean was the defendant and a Chinese was the plaintiff, the case was tried by a Korean judge and a Chinese official could attend the trial. The observer was guaranteed to question or cross question witnesses and to argue against unfair judgments.
For the case that a Chinese was murdered in Korea before the Sino Japanese War (the murder case of Chinese merchant Cho hale In), a Chinese official tried jointly with a Korean official, and for the case that a Korean was murdered (the assault and murder of Korean solider Lee Deok Myeong), the Chinese suspect was protected actively by the Chinese agency. On the contrary, the Korean government delivered the Korean criminal for the murder of a Chinese to the Chinese agency and had to try him jointly with the Chinese official, and could not raise any objection to the result of the trial of the Chinese offender in a murder case of a Korean. When a Korean woman (Kang) was murdered by a Chinese in Korea after the Sino
Japanese War, the Chinese Consul protected the offender strictly under the according to defendant's nationality principle of the Consul's jurisdiction regardless of the Korean observer's opinion. On the contrary, when a Chinese was murdered (the assault and murder case of Chinese seaman in Hae Zu), the Korean government sent an observer, but had little influence on the consequence of the trial. This situation was much different from that before the Sino Japanese War. However, the new Korea China relationship after the Sino Japanese War ended up as a mere short term 'experiment' due to change in Korea Japan relationship.
#소송
#영사재판권
#朝淸商民水陸貿易章程
#韓淸通商條約
#淸商 初學仁 살인 사건
#조선 병사 李德明 구타
#치사 건
#美女 命案
#海州 중국 船戶 구타 치사 건
#legal case
#consular jurisdiction
#the Regulations for Maritime and Overland Trade between Chinese and Korean Subjects
#the Treaty of Commerce between Korea and China
#the murder case of Chinese merchant Cho hak In
#the assault and murder of Korean solider Lee Deok Myeong
#the murder case of Korean woman Kang
#the assault and murder case of Chinese seaman in Hae Zu
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 在韓 韓中間 소송 안건의 처리 과정
Ⅲ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘訴訟’ 안건을 통해 본 청일전쟁 이후(1895~1899) 韓中關係 연구
중국근현대사연구
2008 .06
-
韓國 漢字語의 中國語 飜譯에 관한 硏究 : 誤譯의 類型 分析을 中心으로
어문론집
2011 .11
-
鲁迅的遗言和Chinese Characteristics
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2015 .11
-
중국어 외래어를 원지음으로 표기해야할 이유
중국어문학논집
2009 .06
-
華僑, 華僑 네트워크와 駐韓使館 -청일전쟁 이후 한성 지역을 중심으로-
중국사연구
2014 .01
-
한중 한자어 비교사전 구축을 위한 초보적 고찰
한국사전학
2011 .04
-
중국어 규칙변환 교육시스템 설계에 관한 연구
언어학 연구
2016 .10
-
국가와 종족의 상호작용을 통해 본 조선족의 종족정체성 : 대련시 조선족학교의 사례를 중심으로
비교문화연구
2010 .07
-
2007년 개정 漢文科 敎育課程의 구체적 내용 분석
漢文敎育論集
2007 .01
-
근ㆍ현대 한국인의 중국 인식(認識)과 중국인의 한국 인식 변화
중국문화연구
2006 .06
-
중국어사와 국어사의 융합연구－근대중국어 어휘의 전파를 중심으로－
중국어문학
2019 .01
-
조선족과 한족 대학생의 중국어, 한국어의 음절구조 지각에 대한 연구
음성과학
2005 .06
-
海外 韓國語 學習者를 위한 漢字 및 漢字語 敎育方案 -베네치아大學*을 中心으로-
漢字漢文敎育
2012 .01
-
從韓中大學男生姓名看韓中文化差異
중국어문학논집
2020 .08
-
論日語漢字詞的發展曆程及與漢語詞的關系
중국어교육과연구
2008 .11
-
한·중·일 어휘 비교를 통한 한국 한자어의 특성 고찰
언어과학연구
1999 .12
-
Sino-Korean Initials : Their Comparisons with Chinese Dialects and Sino - Japanese
중국어문학논집
1994 .12
-
한국에서의 한자병용에 대한 단상(斷想)
중국학
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-910-001598014