지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Traditional Korea-China relation, the consul system couldn't work. Because a main agent of a trade were not individuals but states in East Asia. There was therefore no need to protect their own overseas merchants. That was logically unnecessary.
With the Imm-oh Military Revolt(1882), however, the relation between the two countries became to change. Immediately after the military revolt, the two countries contracted Regulations For Maritime And Overland Trade between Chinese And Korean Subjects(1882). The regulations required the exchanges of the Commercial Government Agents. Here, the agents were a substantial consul. Because, the main responsibility of the agents was to protect their nationals in the trading partner. By the way, the relation between the twos was severed with the First Sino-Japanese War(1894). Because of that, Chinese merchants in Korea(Joseon) were in unexpected hardship. After the year 1894, therefore, the British Consul in Korea was commissioned to protect Chinese merchants. It was a incomplete condition.
To solve such a condition, Qing Dynasty send the non-governmental Superintendent to Korea. The responsibility of the Superintendent was also similar to the that of the Commercial Government Agent.
In the consular relation between the two countries, the year 1896 was a important year. Because, in that year, China send the first consul to Korea. The consul was Tang Shaoyi. But it was a one-sided dispatch. Korea didn't send consuls to China.
The year that the consular relation was institutionalize was 1899. In that year, the twos contracted the Treaty Of Friendship And Commerce Between China And Korea. Article 2 of the treaty required the exchanges of the consuls. With this, the consular relation between the twos entered a period of a institutionalization. However, the Korean Government still didn't dispatch consuls. Only the Chinese Government dispatched consuls.
Afterward, the consular relation suffered so many complications. That relation was linked to fate of the twos. In the year 1905, the Korean Government lost the diplomatic power, and it caused change of the authority over the Chinese consuls in Korea. With the year 1905, the Chinese Minister to Japan began to superintend the Chinese consuls in Korea. And 1910 was also a important year. With the fall of Joseon Dynasty, the Treaty Of Friendship And Commerce Between China And Korea lost effect. As a substitute, the treaty between China and Japan became the legal basis of the consular relations.
With the Imm-oh Military Revolt(1882), however, the relation between the two countries became to change. Immediately after the military revolt, the two countries contracted Regulations For Maritime And Overland Trade between Chinese And Korean Subjects(1882). The regulations required the exchanges of the Commercial Government Agents. Here, the agents were a substantial consul. Because, the main responsibility of the agents was to protect their nationals in the trading partner. By the way, the relation between the twos was severed with the First Sino-Japanese War(1894). Because of that, Chinese merchants in Korea(Joseon) were in unexpected hardship. After the year 1894, therefore, the British Consul in Korea was commissioned to protect Chinese merchants. It was a incomplete condition.
To solve such a condition, Qing Dynasty send the non-governmental Superintendent to Korea. The responsibility of the Superintendent was also similar to the that of the Commercial Government Agent.
In the consular relation between the two countries, the year 1896 was a important year. Because, in that year, China send the first consul to Korea. The consul was Tang Shaoyi. But it was a one-sided dispatch. Korea didn't send consuls to China.
The year that the consular relation was institutionalize was 1899. In that year, the twos contracted the Treaty Of Friendship And Commerce Between China And Korea. Article 2 of the treaty required the exchanges of the consuls. With this, the consular relation between the twos entered a period of a institutionalization. However, the Korean Government still didn't dispatch consuls. Only the Chinese Government dispatched consuls.
Afterward, the consular relation suffered so many complications. That relation was linked to fate of the twos. In the year 1905, the Korean Government lost the diplomatic power, and it caused change of the authority over the Chinese consuls in Korea. With the year 1905, the Chinese Minister to Japan began to superintend the Chinese consuls in Korea. And 1910 was also a important year. With the fall of Joseon Dynasty, the Treaty Of Friendship And Commerce Between China And Korea lost effect. As a substitute, the treaty between China and Japan became the legal basis of the consular relations.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅰ. 청일전쟁 이후 조선총영사의 파견
Ⅱ. 한청통상조약과 영사관계의 제도화
Ⅲ. 한ㆍ청 멸망과정과 영사관계의 문제
맺음말
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘訴訟’ 안건을 통해 본 청일전쟁 이후(1895~1899) 韓中關係 연구
중국근현대사연구
2008 .06
-
영제국 외무부 내 영사의 지위, 1855-1914
영국 연구
2016 .01
-
淸日戰爭 이전과 이후 在韓 韓中間 '訴訟' 안건 비교 분석
아시아문화연구
2009 .11
-
영제국 외무부 내 영사의 정치･행정적 입지 분석, 1782-1865―1825년 영사법(Consular Advances Act) 제정 전후를 중심으로―
영국 연구
2013 .01
-
희망의 삼중창 : Graham Greene의 The Honorary Consul
영어영문학
1992 .05
-
근대시기 한중관계의 변화과정
역사와 담론
2013 .10
-
중화민국 시기 주조선 영사관원의 이력과 활동 －마영발(馬永發)의 사례－
史叢(사총)
2018 .01
-
근ㆍ현대 한국인의 중국 인식(認識)과 중국인의 한국 인식 변화
중국문화연구
2006 .06
-
한국주재 러시아 총영사 플란손의 착임과정에서 제기된 인가장 부여 문제에 관한 연구
史叢(사총)
2011 .01
-
수교 이후 한중관계의 평가와 신형관계(新型關係)를 위한 정책제언
아시아문화연구
2020 .08
-
韓國內 中國 租界交涉과 中國近代外交 -駐朝鮮總領事의 租界撤廢交涉을 中心으로-
중국사연구
2015 .01
-
華僑, 華僑 네트워크와 駐韓使館 -청일전쟁 이후 한성 지역을 중심으로-
중국사연구
2014 .01
-
Transformation of the Dualistic International Order into the Modern Treaty System in the Sino-Korean Relationship
International Journal of Korean History
2010 .08
-
근대중국의 불평등조약 중 선교조항의 선교적 이중성
신학과 목회
2015 .05
-
駐津督理通商事務의 활동을 통해서 본 事大와 交隣의 교착 －『舊韓國政府外交文書綴』 第三冊~第五冊의 分析－
한국사학보
2020 .05
-
韓淸通商條約 일부 條文의 해석을 둘러싼 韓-淸의 외교 분쟁
대구사학
2006 .01
-
19세기 한국의 국제법 수용과 중국과의 전통적 관계 청산을 위한 투쟁
역사학보
2004 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
中華民國 前期(1912∼1927) 駐朝鮮 領事館 組織 : 人的 構成의 측면을 중심으로
이은자
중국근현대사연구
2015
.06
淸末 駐韓 中國 公館의 조직과 그 위상 : 駐韓公使 許台身과 曾廣銓 재직 시기를 중심으로
이은자
중국근현대사연구
2011
.09
淸日戰爭 이전과 이후 在韓 韓中間 '訴訟' 안건 비교 분석
이은자
아시아문화연구
2009
.11
1882년 조약･장정의 체결과 속국(屬國)･반주지국(半主之國) 조선의 국제법적 지위
유바다
역사와현실
2016
.03
‘장정체제’에 대한 조선 정부의 저항과 만국공법 : 1883~1884년 무역장정의 발효 시점을 중심으로
박은숙
역사학보
2015
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-912-003983840