지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
All historians interpret history not only for its own sake but in pursuit of their own time's interest and hopes for the future. This is especially true for the German and American historians involved in the First World War. Their propaganda writings have become an issue of permanent. relevance since they dramatically reveal to what extent the scientific ideals of historians can be outweighed by the values of their time.
For the German and American war-time historians the concept of "nation" became the most important factor to determine not only their theories, but also their actions. They felt they were forced to submit to the highest value by three combined powers: At the top, there was 'state's censorship, from below, the pressure of the masses, and from the inside, there was their own emotional attachment to their nation, Thus, the war publications of German and American historians mirror the different ways in which their authors dealt with the conflict between their demand for objectivity and values; they were tom between the scientist and the citizen.
The scientific battle between German and American Historians at the homefront resulted in a confrontation that revealed the incompatibility of Mid- and Western Europe's highest values, their ideas of "culture" and "democracy".
War-time actions of historians had an immense effect on different ways of development of history in Germany and the United States. In Germany history had already been established as a 'science(wissenschaft)' in the early 19th century. In contrast, in the United States, historians were still struggling for recognition and emancipation from amateur historians. As a result, the impact of the historians' participation in war-time publishing in America was much greater than in Germany.
For the German and American war-time historians the concept of "nation" became the most important factor to determine not only their theories, but also their actions. They felt they were forced to submit to the highest value by three combined powers: At the top, there was 'state's censorship, from below, the pressure of the masses, and from the inside, there was their own emotional attachment to their nation, Thus, the war publications of German and American historians mirror the different ways in which their authors dealt with the conflict between their demand for objectivity and values; they were tom between the scientist and the citizen.
The scientific battle between German and American Historians at the homefront resulted in a confrontation that revealed the incompatibility of Mid- and Western Europe's highest values, their ideas of "culture" and "democracy".
War-time actions of historians had an immense effect on different ways of development of history in Germany and the United States. In Germany history had already been established as a 'science(wissenschaft)' in the early 19th century. In contrast, in the United States, historians were still struggling for recognition and emancipation from amateur historians. As a result, the impact of the historians' participation in war-time publishing in America was much greater than in Germany.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 역사가들의 동원
Ⅲ. 선전활동: ‘문화‘와 ‘민주주의‘의 충돌
Ⅳ. 검열활동: 학문적 양심의 질식
Ⅴ. 참전활동이 전후 양국 역사학계에 미친 영향
Ⅵ. 결언
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
탈근대 지식인으로서 역사가
역사와 담론
2008 .12
-
현대사의 증인 마누엘 투뇬 데 라라
역사비평
2009 .05
-
Should Korean Historians Abandon Nationalism?
Korea Journal
1999 .06
-
The Indian Ocean: Historians Writing History
The Asian review of world histories
2013 .01
-
Russian Historians on the DPRK
Korea Journal
2008 .06
-
[총설] 패션과 아젠다 : 한국의 서양사학, 2011~2012
역사학보
2013 .09
-
역사의 정치화, 정치의 역사화 독일 <현대사 연구소> 설립을 둘러싼 논쟁
대구사학
2007 .01
-
[미국] 한국 미국사 연구 : 누구를 위한 역사학인가?
역사학보
2011 .09
-
미국사학계의 새로운 냉전사 연구
역사비평
2015 .02
-
신문화사적 관점에서 본 18세기 프랑스
프랑스사 연구
1999 .12
-
역사가의 사고과정이 드러나는 서술의 특징과 교재개발 방향
역사교육
2000 .04
-
후기 산업사회의 역사학과 대중 : 중국학계의 大衆史學/ 公共史學 논의를 중심으로
역사학보
2019 .03
-
교착과 돌파 : 서구 학계의 제1차 세계대전 연구 동향과 쟁점
역사비평
2014 .08
-
1919년 - 서구 역사학의 분기점?
韓國史學史學報
2018 .01
-
역사학과 과거청산 : 나치시대 역사가들을 어떻게 볼 것인가?
대구사학
2005 .01
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
Collective Memory, Historians, and the Construction of the National Identity of Koreans Through the Japanese
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
1998 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002859973