지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It would be desirable in setting up laws to approach in two ways. The one is about the contents of itself, and the other would be to inspect the problems associated with the reform of the system thoroughly and to provide the solutions to them. Until now, the primary concern of most studies were about the former, because it formed the core of the law. Exceptionally, there could be some case where the study of the latter would be important as well, though. The whole reform of the basic system of the law would be the case.
There could be many problems expected during law-making in immense turn-over, so legislatures are providing supportive legal procedures for the new system to be effectively accepted without reluctance or disorientation. In this respect, the reform of the systems on juridical person in Japan could be a good model, because they provided a separate law as a supportive legal measures in it.
In Japan, there has been a turn-over in the systems on juridical person. It was the proclamation of three laws related to the reform of public-interest corporation system. The three laws are ?Ordinary Incorporated Non-Profit Association and Foundation Law , Qualification ??of Incorporated Public-Interest Association and Foundation Law?and ?Arrangement Law of Related-Laws on Juridical Persons?. These were established on 26th of May in 2006 and published on 2nd of June the same year and were enforced on 1st of December in 2008.
Those three laws constitute the overall axis of the reform of the juridical person and were related to each other that it would be desirable to study them altogether. Nevertheless, the main focus of this study lies in legal measures to avoid the problems associated with the reform of the system, so this study will deal with ?Arrangement Law of Related-Laws on Juridical Persons?mainly.
There were 25000 public-interest corporations in Japan when these laws were enforced and there would be a lot of disarrangement caused by the reform, so they tried to avoid it by enacting separate law. With this law, the beneficiaries of the public-interest corporations and the corporations themselves could dodge those problems.
?Arrangement Law of Related-Laws on Juridical Persons?was, as mentioned previously, enacted to avoid the problems associated with the reform of the system, and this could be a reference if we are to do it.
There could be many problems expected during law-making in immense turn-over, so legislatures are providing supportive legal procedures for the new system to be effectively accepted without reluctance or disorientation. In this respect, the reform of the systems on juridical person in Japan could be a good model, because they provided a separate law as a supportive legal measures in it.
In Japan, there has been a turn-over in the systems on juridical person. It was the proclamation of three laws related to the reform of public-interest corporation system. The three laws are ?Ordinary Incorporated Non-Profit Association and Foundation Law , Qualification ??of Incorporated Public-Interest Association and Foundation Law?and ?Arrangement Law of Related-Laws on Juridical Persons?. These were established on 26th of May in 2006 and published on 2nd of June the same year and were enforced on 1st of December in 2008.
Those three laws constitute the overall axis of the reform of the juridical person and were related to each other that it would be desirable to study them altogether. Nevertheless, the main focus of this study lies in legal measures to avoid the problems associated with the reform of the system, so this study will deal with ?Arrangement Law of Related-Laws on Juridical Persons?mainly.
There were 25000 public-interest corporations in Japan when these laws were enforced and there would be a lot of disarrangement caused by the reform, so they tried to avoid it by enacting separate law. With this law, the beneficiaries of the public-interest corporations and the corporations themselves could dodge those problems.
?Arrangement Law of Related-Laws on Juridical Persons?was, as mentioned previously, enacted to avoid the problems associated with the reform of the system, and this could be a reference if we are to do it.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일본 법인제도 개혁의 개관
Ⅲ. 기존 공익법인의 정비와 신제도로의 이행
Ⅳ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강태성 / 2001 / 法人에 관한 民法 改正方向 / 법조
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권 철 / 2007 / 日本의 새로운 非營利法人제도에 관한 小考- 최근 10년간의 動向과 新法의 소개 - / 비교사법 14 (4) : 117 ~ 171
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김교창 / 2002 / 民法 總則 중 法人에 관한 改正意見 / 법조
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 제철웅 / 2005 / 정부의 “민법중개정법률안”의 평가: 민법총칙 중 法人法을 중심으로 / 재산법연구 21 (2) : 1 ~ 17
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 최성경 / 2008 / 일본의 공익법인제도 개혁 － ｢공익사단법인 및 공익재단법인의 인정 등에 관한 법률｣을 중심으로 － / 민사법학 (41) : 535 ~ 573
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권 철 / 2007 / 日本의 새로운 非營利法人제도에 관한 小考- 최근 10년간의 動向과 新法의 소개 - / 비교사법 14 (4) : 117 ~ 171
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김교창 / 2002 / 民法 總則 중 法人에 관한 改正意見 / 법조
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 제철웅 / 2005 / 정부의 “민법중개정법률안”의 평가: 민법총칙 중 法人法을 중심으로 / 재산법연구 21 (2) : 1 ~ 17
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 최성경 / 2008 / 일본의 공익법인제도 개혁 － ｢공익사단법인 및 공익재단법인의 인정 등에 관한 법률｣을 중심으로 － / 민사법학 (41) : 535 ~ 573
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Juridical Person in Law and Comparative Law
저스티스
1991 .06
-
WHAT IS LAW
저스티스
1965 .04
-
일본의 법인 아닌 사단에 관한 규율의 재검토 : 2008년의 새로운 법인제도 시행을 계기로
법학논총
2019 .01
-
장애인복지 서비스 제공주체로서의 재단법인의 역할과 과제
법학논총
2020 .05
-
미국 상사법의 개별입법화 동향
기업법연구
2009 .12
-
공법상 법인에 관한 연구
홍익법학
2019 .01
-
헌법상 결사의 자유와 비영리법인제도 : 일본에서의 논의를 중심으로
민주주의와 인권
2013 .12
-
한·중 환경기본법 비교 : 중국의 「환경보호법」을 중심으로
중앙법학
2009 .08
-
법인·단체법의 변천과 과제
법과기업연구
2018 .08
-
공법과 사법 구분의 기원 · 변천 및 당위체계에 관한 연구 : 금전급부 8 유형론의 구체적 실례 및 그 정리와 해결을 중심으로
저스티스
2015 .10
-
로스쿨에서 형사소송법 교육
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
醫療法人稅制에 관한 합리적 개편
조세법연구
2002 .07
-
공익법인제도의 개선에 관한 연구 : 일본 제도와의 비교를 중심으로
서강법률논총
2016 .02
-
한국 세법상 내국법인과 외국법인의 구분기준 : 한ㆍ일ㆍ중의 사법 및 세법상 비교를 중심으로
조세법연구
2008 .04
-
‘사단·조합 준별론’ 재검토 小考 - 단체·법인론의 기본 문제 -
비교사법
2020 .02
-
공익활동 활성화를 위한 공익법인 과세제도의 개선방안
조세연구
2019 .03
-
충남대학교 법학전문대학원의 민법 교육과정 및 교육방법
법학연구
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000473165