메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jae Kyung Kim (배재대학교) Young Woo Cho (배재대학교)
저널정보
한국응용언어학회 응용언어학 응용언어학 제26권 2호
발행연도
2010.6
수록면
241 - 269 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study compared three types of form-focused instruction: traditional deductive grammatical explanation (comparison), input-enhanced grammar instruction (reading-based), and output-enhanced grammar instruction (writing-based). Ninety-four Korean college students took a pretest in Week 1, and received one of the three treatments on three English grammatical forms: articles, count/non-count nouns, and the distinction between present perfect and present perfect continuous in Week 5 through 7. Then, they took a posttest in Week 8 (immediate) and a delayed posttest in Week 15. The results from the articles test indicated that the output-enhanced grammar instruction group showed greater improvement than the other groups. This difference held up on the delayed posttest. The results from the noun countability test showed that both output-enhanced and input-enhanced grammar instruction had a significant effect on the posttest gains, but no significant differences existed between both. Finally, the results from the tense test showed no significant difference among the three groups. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of form-focused instruction is constrained by form type.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Literature Review
Ⅲ. Method
Ⅳ. Results
Ⅴ. Discussion and Conclusion
References
Appendix : Sample Test Items
Author’s Biodata

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0