메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국어학회 한국어학 한국어학 제67권
발행연도
2015.5
수록면
59 - 88 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, we summarized feature of the punctuation rules as amended, and proposed a vision for future directions for use of the punctuation rules. An amendment to the punctuation rules in critical of punctuation marks weren``t in the definition included on the opening. Although it was incomplete, they are meaningful that they offered us a punctuation mark starting point. There are horizontal writing of punctuation marks 24 species only in punctuation mark as amended. ‘The arrow parenthesis’ and ‘underline’ punctuation is newly registered. Used in vertical writing ‘Gorijeom, Mojeom’ were deleted, while ‘Natpyo’ is modified a horizontal writing punctuation usage. In amendment to the punctuation rules so far that has been confusion of directions for many problems, it emphasized a practical part for user. Punctuation mark, name of ‘a period : Onjeom’, ‘a comma : Banjeom’ with confusion has decided and ‘a period’ and ‘a comma’, also allowed the use of ‘Onjeom’, ‘Banjeom’. An ellipsis in the case of six points that have been recognized only to take over the center also was allowed to use scored 3 or 6 below, center. Also, the punctuation’s spacing rule relevant provisions are added. So the user had to make it easy to write. The provisions also enjoyed on him. But punctuation mark, Regulation as amended, was attaching narrative to be able to resolve these difficulties were.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-701-002265471