지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第133輯
- 발행연도
- 2015.12
- 수록면
- 183 - 205 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2015.12.133.183
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims at finding major trends and conspicuous changes during the last thirty years, from 1985 to the present, in the field of Central Asian history as well as the history of Liao, Jin and Yuan dynasties. As a result of our review the present writer was able to find out three new distinctive developments since 1985.
The first is the creation and the activities of academic associations and research groups specialized in the Mongol studies, the Altaic studies, the Central Asia studies, and the history of Song-Liao-Jin-Yuan dynasties. These organizations became the central field of scholarly activities.
The second is the establishment of the study of Central Asian history as a branch of historical studies in Korea. Before 1985 scholars paid attention to it and published some works related to that field, but it was generally perceived as a part or an extension of Chinese history. After 1985 young scholars who were able to utilize the non-Chinese sources, such as those written in Mongolian, Turkic and Persian, began to publish their works, and Central Asia came to be regarded as an independent historical and cultural area.
The third is the rapid expansion of the Mongol-Yuan historical studies. Compared to other areas of research like Qitan Liao or Jurchen Jin, the growing interest in the Mongol empire is quite astonishing. A number of scholars published their books and articles, scholarly books in English or in Japanese were translated, and the primary sources written in Persian and Arabic languages were also translated, which all reflect the degree of scholarly and popular interest in the history of the Mongol empire.
In sum, the scholarly researches in the field of Central Asian history and Liao-Jin-Yuan dynasties have achieved a remarkable development. However, the institutional framework, such as the availability of faculty position in universities and the scope of the lectures in the curriculum, is lagged far behind. So what confronts the Central Asian scholars in future would be how to narrow down this gap and to make a stable condition for Central Asian studies.
The first is the creation and the activities of academic associations and research groups specialized in the Mongol studies, the Altaic studies, the Central Asia studies, and the history of Song-Liao-Jin-Yuan dynasties. These organizations became the central field of scholarly activities.
The second is the establishment of the study of Central Asian history as a branch of historical studies in Korea. Before 1985 scholars paid attention to it and published some works related to that field, but it was generally perceived as a part or an extension of Chinese history. After 1985 young scholars who were able to utilize the non-Chinese sources, such as those written in Mongolian, Turkic and Persian, began to publish their works, and Central Asia came to be regarded as an independent historical and cultural area.
The third is the rapid expansion of the Mongol-Yuan historical studies. Compared to other areas of research like Qitan Liao or Jurchen Jin, the growing interest in the Mongol empire is quite astonishing. A number of scholars published their books and articles, scholarly books in English or in Japanese were translated, and the primary sources written in Persian and Arabic languages were also translated, which all reflect the degree of scholarly and popular interest in the history of the Mongol empire.
In sum, the scholarly researches in the field of Central Asian history and Liao-Jin-Yuan dynasties have achieved a remarkable development. However, the institutional framework, such as the availability of faculty position in universities and the scope of the lectures in the curriculum, is lagged far behind. So what confronts the Central Asian scholars in future would be how to narrow down this gap and to make a stable condition for Central Asian studies.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 전문 학회·연구회의 출현과 활동
Ⅲ. 중앙아시아사 분야의 확립
Ⅳ. 몽원제국사 연구의 발전
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[중국 근세Ⅰ] 다양화 · 다각화의 지속과 모색 : 2014~2015년 송요금원사 연구
역사학보
2016 .10
-
루안판의 『북원사』에 대한 비판적 검토 - 주요 서술의 특이성과 쟁점을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2022 .09
-
[중국 근세 Ⅰ]송요금원사 회고와 전망: 2020~2021년 연구성과를 중심으로
역사학보
2022 .09
-
금·원대 여성작가 詩詞작품 연구
외국학연구
2021 .01
-
『遼史』高麗傳의 史源
동양사학연구
2023 .06
-
고려-몽골(원) 관계사 연구를 위한 노력과 종합적 시각의 모색
역사학보
2025 .03
-
[중국근세Ⅰ] 송요금원사 회고와 전망: 2022~2023년 연구성과를 중심으로
역사학보
2024 .09
-
중국 歷史敎育에서의 遼ㆍ金에 대한 認識
사림
2018 .01
-
[중국 근세Ⅰ] 연구주제의 다양화와 새로운 경향 : 송요금원사 회고와 전망 2016~2017
역사학보
2018 .09
-
屠寄의 蒙兀兒史記 편찬과 전환기의 역사 인식
역사문화연구
2024 .08
-
교과서의 고려시대 대외관계사 쟁점 연구
역사교육
2017 .09
-
13~14세기 元耽羅 관계 연구 동향 분석
탐라문화
2019 .01
-
원굉도(袁宏道) 시의 ‘전변’에 관한 검토
중어중문학
2016 .09
-
한국사에서 13~14세기를 지칭하는 시기 구분 용어의 맥락에 대한 검토
역사학보
2024 .12
-
공민왕 초기 印璫의 활동
민족문화연구
2020 .01
-
1356년 공민왕 反元政治 再論
역사학보
2015 .03
-
‘변방사’로 세계사 읽기 : 중앙유라시아사를 위한 변명
역사학보
2015 .12
-
李穀의 『稼亭集』에 수록된 大元帝國 역사 관련 기록 분석
역사학보
2018 .03
-
대원제국 말기 재상 톡토의 至正 9년(1349) 再執權에 대한 검토
대구사학
2018 .01
-
[중앙아시아] 한국 역사학계의 유라시아 네트워크, 그 성찰과 과제
역사학보
2016 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-910-002472193