지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Whether or not a strike is unlawful is recognized under the strike"s purpose, the time"s appropriateness, the striker"s action as the National Labor Relations Board suggested. The National Labor Relations Act provides the unfair labor practice by labor unions under Article 8(b) so that the industrial action is unlawful in case that labor unions or their agents violate the unfair labor practice under Article 8(b).
Therefore, a union or an individual employee has a civil and criminal liability with respect to unlawful industrial action. In other words, an employer can impose a civil and criminal liability with unlawful industrial action on the union or individual employee. The civil liability with unlawful industrial action consists of the injunction, compensation for damages, or disciplinary action. By contrast, the criminal liability composes the fine or imprisonment. The following suggestion can be reviewed from the civil and criminal liability with respect to unlawful industrial action.
Firstly, the injunction of the National Labor Relations Board is a first measure against unlawful industrial action and if a union does not follow a court order, it will be punished as the fine or imprisonment resulting from the contempt of court. This injunction takes a measure with unlawful industrial action and imposed the compulsion through heavy punishments if the order of court is not followed.
Secondly, the RICO and Hobbs Act regulate the unlawful action of labor unions in that the National Labor Relations Act does not provide a penalty clause with violent action of labor unions as they take measures with respect to unlawful industrial action.
As a result, as the injunction can take measures quickly against unlawful industrial action and the RICO and Hobbs Act as an independent law apply to unlawful industrial action, the institution and policy plan shall be introduced in order to decide the civil and criminal liability with respect to unlawful industrial action in Korea.
Therefore, a union or an individual employee has a civil and criminal liability with respect to unlawful industrial action. In other words, an employer can impose a civil and criminal liability with unlawful industrial action on the union or individual employee. The civil liability with unlawful industrial action consists of the injunction, compensation for damages, or disciplinary action. By contrast, the criminal liability composes the fine or imprisonment. The following suggestion can be reviewed from the civil and criminal liability with respect to unlawful industrial action.
Firstly, the injunction of the National Labor Relations Board is a first measure against unlawful industrial action and if a union does not follow a court order, it will be punished as the fine or imprisonment resulting from the contempt of court. This injunction takes a measure with unlawful industrial action and imposed the compulsion through heavy punishments if the order of court is not followed.
Secondly, the RICO and Hobbs Act regulate the unlawful action of labor unions in that the National Labor Relations Act does not provide a penalty clause with violent action of labor unions as they take measures with respect to unlawful industrial action.
As a result, as the injunction can take measures quickly against unlawful industrial action and the RICO and Hobbs Act as an independent law apply to unlawful industrial action, the institution and policy plan shall be introduced in order to decide the civil and criminal liability with respect to unlawful industrial action in Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 합법과 위법 쟁의행위
Ⅲ. 민ㆍ형사상 책임
Ⅳ. 시사점과 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
[보고서] - 강현주 / 2000 / 쟁의행위 정당성의 국제비교 : 제5장 미국에서의 쟁의행위의 정당성
[보고서] - 이승욱 / 2008 / 쟁의행위의 정당성과 형법적용에 대한 연구-업무방해죄를 중심으로 한 국제기구 사례와 시사점-
[기타자료] - Charles B. Craver / 2012 / The Right to Strike and Its Possible Conflict with Other Fundamental Rights of the People in the United States at XX World Congress of Labour & Social Security Law
[단행본] - Cox / 2001 / Labor Law - Cases and Materials / Foundation Press
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1964 / Damages for Unfair Labor Practices / Indiana Law Journal 40 (1)
[보고서] - 이승욱 / 2008 / 쟁의행위의 정당성과 형법적용에 대한 연구-업무방해죄를 중심으로 한 국제기구 사례와 시사점-
[기타자료] - Charles B. Craver / 2012 / The Right to Strike and Its Possible Conflict with Other Fundamental Rights of the People in the United States at XX World Congress of Labour & Social Security Law
[단행본] - Cox / 2001 / Labor Law - Cases and Materials / Foundation Press
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1964 / Damages for Unfair Labor Practices / Indiana Law Journal 40 (1)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
위법한 쟁의행위로 인한 손해배상책임 — 대법원 판결례와 민사책임 법리의 검토를 중심으로—
노동법포럼
2023 .07
-
미국의 노동조합 경비원조에 대한 태도와 시사점
노동법논총
2017 .08
-
노조법 개정안 환노위 대안 제3조의 해석론상의 문제점과 평가
노동법포럼
2023 .07
-
위법쟁의행위로 인한 손해배상책임의 귀속(Zurechnung) ―독일에서의 논의를 겸하여―
노동법포럼
2023 .07
-
노동기본권의 본질과 쟁의행위
法學論文集
2015 .01
-
사용인의 부정행위에 따른 납세자의 세법상 제재 부담 여부에 관한 고찰 ― 국세기본법상 부당과소신고가산세를 중심으로 ―
세무와 회계연구
2022 .05
-
부당노동행위 구제제도의 실효성 확보를 위한 제언
노동법포럼
2019 .11
-
조세범처벌법상 조세포탈의 부정행위에 관한 연구 - 징수만을 불가능 혹은 현저히 곤란하게 하는 행위의 평가를 중심으로 -
法學論文集
2017 .08
-
항공기내 경미한 불법방해 행위에 대한 법적개선방안 연구 - 범칙금 제도 도입방안을 중심으로 -
한국항공경영학회지
2019 .01
-
中国法中提供劳务者受害责任漏洞与未来民法典应对
중국법연구
2019 .01
-
정당한 공무원노동조합 활동의 판단기준과 허용범위 등에 관한 연구
법학연구
2015 .09
-
부당노동행위 인정요건과 판단
노동법학
2016 .03
-
4차 산업혁명과 노사관계 : 노사갈등 이슈와 서구 노조들의 대응전략을 중심으로
한국사회정책
2018 .06
-
부당노동행위 구제신청의 주체와 구제명령의 상대방인 사용자 —대상판결: 대법원 2022.5.12. 선고 2017두54005 판결—
노동법포럼
2023 .03
-
쟁의행위를 이유로 한 손해배상청구의 제한
노동법논총
2023 .04
-
미국 연방정부 공무원의 노동기본권 보장과 구성
노동법학
2017 .06
-
협력적 노사관계의 효과 : 노조와 조직몰입 및 신뢰의 관계
대한경영학회지
2017 .05
-
공동사용자 개념과 논의의 한국적 함의
노동법포럼
2018 .02
-
법조비리의 실태와 대책에 관한 연구 (Ⅰ) : 브로커형 법조비리의 실태와 대책
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2018 .12
-
“디지털 성범죄” 관련 정부대책과 개선방안
동북아법연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0