지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.9
- 수록면
- 1 - 209 (209page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the beginning of the 6th mayoral term, the ‘Collaborative Governance Seoul 2.0’ has been propelled as a key policy. Among various policy measures to achieve this goal, institutionalising collaborative governance(CG) at the local level is located at the core, as spatially collaborative projects are taking place in local communities. However, the current institutional grounds and the capacity of local communities are not yet sufficient for realising collaborative governance at the local level. Therefore, this research aims to build a collaborative governance model for the local community.
The first step of the research was to identify the current projects in Seoul based on the principles of CG. It was identified that there were approximately 1,126 projects worth ￦7,661,500 million. Among them, the projects that received grants from the Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) accounted for the majority; 920 projects (81.7%) worth ￦6,060,700 million. This was followed by identification of formal processes of the CG projects in line with the budgetary processes in the SMG and borough(gu)-level governments. Subsequently, this research examined the current practices and governance structures of CG in three boroughs in more detail.
Throughout this process, the following five pending issues were drawn out:
- The SMG-led top down policy process
- Inefficiencies due to the fragmentation of and duplication among policies and projects
- ‘Illogicality’ caused by the public sector-led CG projects
- Lack of opportunity for participation and lack of capacity of local communities
- Lack of efficacy due to tokenism in CG projects
In order to tackle these pending issues, a new model for the local-level CG was suggested. The new model consisted of the following three main components: 「Local CG Innovation Plan」(LCGIP), 「00 Borough CG Committee」(BCGC), and 「CG Friendly Budgeting System」(CGFBS). This research focused more on the BCGC and LCGIP, and the CGFBS will be studied more thoroughly in a separate research. The LCGIP is a strategic plan established and delivered by local communities. The aim of establishing the plan is to realise bottom up, participatory, and strategic planning which seeks convergence among relevant policies and projects through joint-up governance. The BCGCs have local partnerships, which are suggested to be established one in each borough and in charge of the establishment and delivery of the LCGIP. Realisation of the LCGIP and the BCGC will only be possible and effective if an appropriate budgeting system exists, and therefore, the CGFBS was briefly examined in this research.
The first step of the research was to identify the current projects in Seoul based on the principles of CG. It was identified that there were approximately 1,126 projects worth ￦7,661,500 million. Among them, the projects that received grants from the Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) accounted for the majority; 920 projects (81.7%) worth ￦6,060,700 million. This was followed by identification of formal processes of the CG projects in line with the budgetary processes in the SMG and borough(gu)-level governments. Subsequently, this research examined the current practices and governance structures of CG in three boroughs in more detail.
Throughout this process, the following five pending issues were drawn out:
- The SMG-led top down policy process
- Inefficiencies due to the fragmentation of and duplication among policies and projects
- ‘Illogicality’ caused by the public sector-led CG projects
- Lack of opportunity for participation and lack of capacity of local communities
- Lack of efficacy due to tokenism in CG projects
In order to tackle these pending issues, a new model for the local-level CG was suggested. The new model consisted of the following three main components: 「Local CG Innovation Plan」(LCGIP), 「00 Borough CG Committee」(BCGC), and 「CG Friendly Budgeting System」(CGFBS). This research focused more on the BCGC and LCGIP, and the CGFBS will be studied more thoroughly in a separate research. The LCGIP is a strategic plan established and delivered by local communities. The aim of establishing the plan is to realise bottom up, participatory, and strategic planning which seeks convergence among relevant policies and projects through joint-up governance. The BCGCs have local partnerships, which are suggested to be established one in each borough and in charge of the establishment and delivery of the LCGIP. Realisation of the LCGIP and the BCGC will only be possible and effective if an appropriate budgeting system exists, and therefore, the CGFBS was briefly examined in this research.
목차
[표지]
[요약]
[목차]
표
그림
[01 연구의 개요]
1_연구의 배경 및 목적
2_연구의 범위와 방법
[02 지역사회기반 협치사업 여건]
1_서울시 협치제도 및 정책(사업) 현황
2_지역사회 협치사업 주요 현황
[03 지역사회기반 협치 실태]
1_실태조사 개요
2_협치실태 조사결과 주요 내용
3_요약 및 시사점
[04 현안과제]
1_시정주도의 하방적 정책거버넌스 구조
2_사업의 중복성과 사업 간 분절화에 따른 정책의 비효율
3_공공주도 협치사업 추진에 따른 불합리성
4_취약한 지역사회 역량과 주민들의 참여 기회 부족
5_협치사업의 형식(주의)화에 따른 실효성 약화
[05 정책방안]
1_정책의 방향
2_지역사회혁신계획의 도입 및 운영 방안
3_지역사회 협치선도기구 구성·운영 방안
4_지역사회 기반 협치예산제 도입·운영 방안
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[Abstract]
Contents
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Leverage, Corporate Governance and Real Earnings Management: Evidence from Korean Market
Global Business and Finance Review
2020 .01
-
「CG Watch 2016」에 나타난 한국의 기업지배구조
이슈&분석
2017 .04
-
「CG Watch 2018」에 나타난 한국의 기업지배구조
이슈&분석
2018 .12
-
「CG Watch 2016」에 나타난 한국의 기업지배구조
기업지배구조연구
2018 .02
-
CG Watch 2023 - 한국의 기업거버넌스
이슈&분석
2024 .06
-
최근 일본에서의 기업지배구조의 움직임
경영법률
2016 .01
-
서울형 협치모델 구축방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2015 .07
-
‘장자의 꿈’일까? CG가 만든 세상 : 가상현실, 증강현실 그리고 혼합현실의 이해
신문과방송
2016 .11
-
The effects of strength exercise and walking on lumbar function, pain level, and body composition in chronic back pain patients
Journal of exercise rehabilitation
2016 .01
-
청소년이 행복한 지역사회 지표조사 및 조성사업 연구Ⅶ: 청소년이 행복한 지역사회 지표조사 분석 및 지자체 청소년정책 추진기반 강화 방안
한국청소년정책연구원 연구보고서
2019 .12
-
서울시 민관협치 활성화 기본계획 수립 연구
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2017 .10
-
Effects of diaphragm and deep abdominal muscle exercise on walking and balance ability in patients with hemiplegia due to stroke
Journal of exercise rehabilitation
2018 .01
-
경기북부 전략사업의 성과평가와 개선과제 연구
정책연구
2020 .08
-
Role of Forensic Accounting to Strengthen Corporate Governance
The Journals of Economics, Marketing & Management
2017 .03
-
지방자치단체·LH 협력사업 도출을 통한 거버넌스 구축방안 : 제주특별자치도를 대상으로
토지주택연구
2017 .10
-
서울시 생활권계획의 활용과 운영 방향
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2017 .11
-
서울시 협치친화형 평가체계 구축방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2017 .03
-
청소년이 행복한 지역사회 지표개발 및 조성사업 연구 Ⅳ : ‘청소년이 행복한 지역사회 조성 시범사업Ⅱ’ 운영과 정책화 방안
한국청소년정책연구원 연구보고서
2016 .12
-
시민민주주의 활성화 기본계획 추진전략과 과제(2단계)
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2021 .01
-
서울시 안전예산 기준정립과 관리
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2015 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
재정분석지표를 활용한 주민참여예산제도의 제도 운영 효과 분석
윤태섭
,
배정아
한국정부학회 학술발표논문집
2015
.06
협치의 이상과 자치의 딜레마: 홍성통의 지역 거버넌스 분석
진필수
비교문화연구
2019
.12
협치시정의 견인차, 서울시 위원회제 혁신전략
정병순
정책리포트
2018
.12
서울시 근린 변화 연구 : 2005~2015년 개별공시지가의 변화를 중심으로
이달별
국토계획
2018
.02
[지역] 인천 공공유산의 파괴와 커먼즈 운동의 모색 : 애경사, 인천가톨릭회관의 철거와 애관극장의 미래
이희환
황해문화
2018
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-359-001538186