메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이화여자대학교 법학연구소 법학논집 법학논집 제12권 제1호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
201 - 233 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Korea, according to the case law, dependent contractors have been considered as independent contractors because they lack personal subordination to the other party of the contract, which is the most important indicia to be an employee. In terms of economic dependence, I believe dependent contractors are exactly the same as employee in quality and quantity. The only difference between them lies in the degree of personal subordination in terms of quantity. Recently, the salience of the legal distinction between employees and independent contractors has been changed a little by the Supreme Court. Court began to emphasize economic dependence in favor of the definition of employees. This can be considered as an positive approach. It can be a sign to widen its scope, as the emphasis has shifted from direct subordination to include economic dependence as the basis for extending labour protection to workers. However, the current approach the category of employees can be determined only by court gives parties instability to identify their legal relations. It is more desirable to give parties predictability to distinguish between employees and independent contractors. Especially, to identify the scope and definition of dependent contractors is very important. In this regard, in this article I have analyzed the Canadian approach to identify the scope of dependent contractors. I believe the Canadian approach can give us a clue to answer this difficult question.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0