지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is concerned with the so-called Direct Object Restriction (DOR) on English resultatives. The DOR claims that the resultative phrase must be predicated of the direct object. Although it explains why resultative formation is possible with unaccusatives as well as transitives, but not with unergatives, it seems to face difficulties accounting for a subtype of resultatives, leading Rappaport Hovav and Levin (2001) to conclude that the DOR is incorrect.
Contra Rappaport Hovav and Levin, I have shown that the DOR is still valid as a descriptive generalization, especially with respect to canonical English resultatives. In addition, I have argued that the DOR can be subsumed under the following revised version of the theme condition originally proposed by Wechsler (1997).
(i) The Compatibility Condition on Thematic DischargeA resultative phrase must discharge its thematic feature onto an argument and it can do so iff it is compatible with the proto-role features of the latter.
I have also shown that some problematic data for the theme condition can be explained away by the revised version.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
Beavers, John. / 2012 / The Oxford handbook on tense and aspect / Oxford University Press : 908 ~ 936
Boas, Hans Christian. / 2003 / Resultative constructions in English and German / CSLI Publications
Broccias, Cristiano / 2013 / Tying events tight: A reply to Iwata / Language Sciences 38 : 32 ~ 52
Carrier, Jill / 1992 / The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives / Linguistic Inquiry 23 : 173 ~ 234
Chomsky, Noam. / 1981 / Lectures on government and binding / Foris
Boas, Hans Christian. / 2003 / Resultative constructions in English and German / CSLI Publications
Broccias, Cristiano / 2013 / Tying events tight: A reply to Iwata / Language Sciences 38 : 32 ~ 52
Carrier, Jill / 1992 / The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives / Linguistic Inquiry 23 : 173 ~ 234
Chomsky, Noam. / 1981 / Lectures on government and binding / Foris
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Syntactic Status of Resultatives and the Direct Object Restriction
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
영어의 결과구문 특성과 한국인의 이해도
영어교과교육
2016 .01
-
A Split Analysis of Korean Transitive Resultative Constructions
언어학 연구
2020 .01
-
Korean Resultative Construction Redux
언어연구
2022 .08
-
形容词的动态性与现代汉语VA动结式的能产性
중국언어연구
2024 .02
-
A Clausal Analysis of Resultative Constructions with X-key: Evidence from Corpus and Experiments
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
한국어 상 체계와 결과상의 유형 - 2차 상태의 내적 국면을 나타내는 비완망상 -
언어와 정보사회
2016 .11
-
An Experimental Study of Resultative Constructions with X-key
언어학 연구
2018 .10
-
Judgement of Telicity in English Resultative Constructions by Korean Learners of English
외국학연구
2019 .01
-
러시아어 작문･번역 교육을 위한 러시아어-한국어 결과 구문 비교 연구
Foreign Languages Education
2016 .01
-
On the Typology of Small Clauses: Null Subject and Mode of Merge in Resultatives
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
A Usage-based Analysis of L2 Production of English Resultative Constructions
어학연구
2019 .04
-
Korean Speakers' Sensitivity to Aspectual Shift in Resultatives with Derived Accomplishments in English*
영어학연구
2016 .01
-
A Unified Structure for Chinese and Korean Resultatives
생성문법연구
2024 .02
-
Three Types of the Intransitive Resultative Construction in English: A Generative Account
영어학
2023 .01
-
The Pseudo-resultative [V-ko (iss-)] Construction in Korean
어학연구
2018 .08
-
예외격 구문과 타동사 결과구문 비교 및 (모조) 예외격 요소 분석
영어영문학연구
2024 .03
-
L2 영어 학습자의 결과구문 생성의 용법기반 분석(Usage-based Analysis): 한국인 예비대학생 작문 코퍼스 분석을 중심으로
Corpus Linguistics Research
2020 .01
-
A Corpus-based Comparison of the Use of English Resultative Constructions between Chinese English Learners and Native English Speakers
영어교육연구
2021 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0