메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박주영 (순천향대학교)
저널정보
한국영미문학페미니즘학회 영미문학페미니즘 영미문학페미니즘 제28권 제3호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
33 - 67 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay aims to explore how Birthday Letters exploits and abuses Sylvia Plath’s stunning poems in order to undermine her literary authority. This essay argues that Ted Hughes’s poetry consistently attempts to stand guard over the privacy of Plath’s death, exposing his hatred of Plath’s critics and readers. Focused on Hughes’s private memories of his life with Plath, Birthday Letters could be read as a public response to arguments over the politics of publication, representation, and poetic authority. Ghosts of many other Plath’s poems frequently haunt Birthday Letters; this poem also indicates a response to the problems of publicity. Furthermore, this essay examines the familiar but misrepresented aspects of the controversies surrounding Plath and Hughes. Since her untimely death, Plath’s public status has remained heavily contested. Many critics who write about Plath do so not in order to assert her literary authority, but to retract what they suggest is a public standing artificially inflated by the details of her personal life. Male critics and the Plath Estate seek to commodify Plath’s mental health as a way of removing her authority to tell her own story. On the contrary, feminist literary critics make claims for Plath’s poetry and life as an icon of feminism. Feminists accuse Hughes of silencing Plath with concomitant charges of censorship. Ultimately, Hughes’s continuing contest with Plath over the ownership of his life is not a contest with Plath, but with her readers’ interpretations of her words.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0