지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to take a step further in enhancing Chinese education by seeking appropriate educational methods on the basis of the investigation into the degree of Chinese majors’understanding of the structure of ‘V在NL.
This study collected the data from 40 subjects in two ways: (a) the questionnaire was directly distributed and gathered, or (b)it was individually sent and received through Kako Talk.
The findings of the study are as follows. First, in relation to the appearance positions of the adverb 在 and the result complement 在, 97.5% of the subjects were aware of the difference between these two structures.
Secondly, as for the semantic focus of the ‘在NLV’ and ‘V在NL’ structures, only five percent of the subjects showed an accurate awareness of the difference.
Thirdly, when translating the ‘V在NL’ structural sentence into Korean, the subjects showed a high error rate of its aspect. Fourthly, concerning mutual conversion between ‘在NLV’ and ‘V在NL’, the highest error rate appeared when 了or 着 must be added to change the ‘在NLV’ structure. None of the subjects answered all the questions correctly. Finally, for the possibility of converting ‘V在NL’ to ‘V到NL’, the average error rate was 62%, indicating the subjects’low understanding of the V在NL structure.
Based on the results of this experimental study, it is suggested that learning about the V在NL structure should be reinforced. It will be helpful if the following teaching method is used, focusing on the V在NL semantic structure and its conversational features.
Step 1: Briefly explain the appearance position of the 在NL phrase and the usage difference between an adverb and a result complement.
Step 2: Teach the meaning of the V在NL structure.
Step 3: Help learners to understand the utilitarian differences between the 在NLV and the V在NL structures.
Step 4: Briefly mention particular verbs that are not available in the V在NL structure and account for their semantic features.
Although the complexity of the V在NL structure causes some difficulties in understanding it, instructors’careful attention and guidance and their active use of the teaching method suggested above can alleviate them and help learners to use it more accurately.
This study collected the data from 40 subjects in two ways: (a) the questionnaire was directly distributed and gathered, or (b)it was individually sent and received through Kako Talk.
The findings of the study are as follows. First, in relation to the appearance positions of the adverb 在 and the result complement 在, 97.5% of the subjects were aware of the difference between these two structures.
Secondly, as for the semantic focus of the ‘在NLV’ and ‘V在NL’ structures, only five percent of the subjects showed an accurate awareness of the difference.
Thirdly, when translating the ‘V在NL’ structural sentence into Korean, the subjects showed a high error rate of its aspect. Fourthly, concerning mutual conversion between ‘在NLV’ and ‘V在NL’, the highest error rate appeared when 了or 着 must be added to change the ‘在NLV’ structure. None of the subjects answered all the questions correctly. Finally, for the possibility of converting ‘V在NL’ to ‘V到NL’, the average error rate was 62%, indicating the subjects’low understanding of the V在NL structure.
Based on the results of this experimental study, it is suggested that learning about the V在NL structure should be reinforced. It will be helpful if the following teaching method is used, focusing on the V在NL semantic structure and its conversational features.
Step 1: Briefly explain the appearance position of the 在NL phrase and the usage difference between an adverb and a result complement.
Step 2: Teach the meaning of the V在NL structure.
Step 3: Help learners to understand the utilitarian differences between the 在NLV and the V在NL structures.
Step 4: Briefly mention particular verbs that are not available in the V在NL structure and account for their semantic features.
Although the complexity of the V在NL structure causes some difficulties in understanding it, instructors’careful attention and guidance and their active use of the teaching method suggested above can alleviate them and help learners to use it more accurately.
목차
1. 서론
2. V在NL 구조에 대한 이해도 실험 및 분석
2. V在NL 구조에 대한 이해도 실험 및 분석
3. V在NL 구조에 대한 교육 방안
4. 결론
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘V在NL’구조의 의미 도출에 관한 연구 - 중 · 고급단계 학습자 실험연구를 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2020 .06
-
‘在NVL’구조, ‘V在NL’구조 의미에 대한 小考
중국어문학논집
2020 .12
-
淺析 《世說新語》 “在”字句句法結構及其特點 : 以與 《論語》 《孟子》 《呂氏春秋》 《史記》 的比較爲中心
중국어문학논집
2016 .08
-
일본인 소녀 요코가 가진 양의적 의미에 대한 고찰
일본문화연구
2018 .01
-
현대중국어 ‘V+在+一起’ 구조에 대한 연구
중국어문학논집
2016 .04
-
西周 한어의 ‘在’ 詞性 연구－‘在’와 ‘于’ 구조의 비교를 중심으로－
중국어문학
2016 .01
-
시간부사 ‘在’의 형성 과정 및 도출 기제 연구 ― 상 자질 비교분석을 중심으로 ―
동양학
2016 .01
-
중국어 고급단계 학습자의 존재표현 사용현황 연구 -‘NP1+V/着/了+NP2’구조를 중심으로
중국언어연구
2017 .12
-
“V+在+NL”句式的语用研究
중국어문학논집
2019 .08
-
현대중국어 ‘在’, ‘着’, ‘正’의 상적 기능 연구
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2020 .08
-
韓中兩國學生對“進行式”的認知體系研究
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2016 .11
-
중국어 부사 ‘在’, 동태조사 ‘着’ 相 자질 중한 대조 분석
동양학
2015 .01
-
“에/에서”的异同及其與漢語介詞“在”的對比
중국어교육과연구
2018 .12
-
汉语介词“在”的产生时代及鉴别标准
중어중문학
2018 .06
-
“V+在+NL”句式硏究 : 以語義場景和意象圖示分析爲中心
중국어문학논집
2018 .10
-
사건구조와 현대 중국어 ‘형용사+在+NP’구조
중국어문학논집
2023 .12
-
현대중국어 ‘V+在+XP’ 구문 연구
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2020 .08
-
“V+在+NL”句式對動詞的選擇和制約 - 以HSK六级动词为研究对象
중국어문학논집
2018 .12
-
현대중국어 ‘V在(到)一起’ 구문 연구
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2019 .04
-
现代汉语“在”的时空范畴与否定— 以动词“在”为中心
중국어문논총
2021 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-910-000234734