지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Overlap or conflict of jurisdictions in dispute settlement may be defined as situations where the same dispute or related aspects of the same dispute could be brought to two distinct institutions or two different dispute settlement systems for a solution. As the number of different international regimes and tribunals has multiplied over the past years, overlaps of jurisdictions have become commonplace in the international arena. This phenomenon is part of the fragmentation of international law, which is a result of the rise of specialized regimes that have different interests and biases.
Since the World Trade Organization (WTO) recognizes the right of Members to enter into Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs), an inherent tension exists between Members’ rights under their RTAs and their rights under the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). However, there are a limited number of cases in which clear judgments have been made on the conflicting jurisdiction between the WTO and RTAs. Until now, WTO adjudicators have been reluctant to unequivocally state “whether there may be other circumstances in which legal impediments could exist that would preclude a panel from ruling on the merits before it”. This paper considers what potential legal impediments to the exercise of WTO jurisdiction exist if a party raises the question of a WTO panel’s jurisdiction as a preliminary issue, with a specific focus on two WTO dispute settlement cases – Mexico-Soft Drinks (DS308) and Peru-Agricultural Products (DS457).
Since the World Trade Organization (WTO) recognizes the right of Members to enter into Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs), an inherent tension exists between Members’ rights under their RTAs and their rights under the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). However, there are a limited number of cases in which clear judgments have been made on the conflicting jurisdiction between the WTO and RTAs. Until now, WTO adjudicators have been reluctant to unequivocally state “whether there may be other circumstances in which legal impediments could exist that would preclude a panel from ruling on the merits before it”. This paper considers what potential legal impediments to the exercise of WTO jurisdiction exist if a party raises the question of a WTO panel’s jurisdiction as a preliminary issue, with a specific focus on two WTO dispute settlement cases – Mexico-Soft Drinks (DS308) and Peru-Agricultural Products (DS457).
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Overlaps of Jurisdiction between the WTO and RTAs
Ⅲ. Legal Impediments to the Exercise of the WTO’s Jurisdiction
Ⅳ. Conclusion
Ⅳ. BIBLIOGRAPHY
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
WTO 분쟁해결 동향: 2015년
통상법률
2015 .12
-
WTO 분쟁해결 동향 : 2016년
통상법률
2016 .12
-
미·중 전략경쟁하 WTO 다자체제의 전망과 정책 시사점
[KIEP] 중장기통상전략연구
2021 .12
-
중국이 제소한 WTO 분쟁사례에 대한 분석적 연구 : 미국 가금류 사건을 중심으로
무역학회지
2015 .08
-
Regional Trade Agreements in the WTO System: Potential Issues and Solutions
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
2015 .11
-
WTO ADJUDICATION@ me.too: Are Global Public Goods like the World Trade Organization Owned by Governments or by Peoples and Citizens?
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
2020 .05
-
개발도상국에 있어서 WTO 분쟁해결시스템의 유용성
통상정보연구
2021 .06
-
WTO 제도 개혁에 대한 논의
무역연구
2015 .01
-
WTO 분쟁해결기구(Dispute Settlement Body) 최신 동향
통상법률
2019 .08
-
한국의 WTO 분쟁해결제도 참여성과와 과제
통상법률
2020 .02
-
동남아시아의 WTO 무역분쟁 연구: 글로벌 통상환경의 변화에 따른 특성 및 과제를 중심으로
동남아시아연구
2016 .01
-
WTO분쟁해결절차에서 적용가능한 법 간 충돌의 해결 : 비WTO규범과의 충돌논의를 중심으로
국제법학회논총
2016 .06
-
세력확산의 국제정치 : 국제의회네트워크와 글로벌 무역 거버넌스
국제정치논총
2015 .03
-
WTO 분쟁해결의 효율성과 형평성 - 강대국의 성과에 대한 비교 검증 -
국제통상연구
2015 .01
-
국제통상법적 관점에서 미국의 일방적 대중(對中)통상압력에 대한 연구 : WTO 부속서 2 분쟁해결규칙 및 절차에 관한 양해를 중심으로
통상정보연구
2019 .03
-
WTO 무역체제와 산업정책
통상정보연구
2020 .09
-
WTO与区域贸易协定争端解决管辖权竞合问题研究
국제거래와 법
2016 .08
-
WTO DSB의 운영 현황 분석을 통한 문제점 및 개선방안 연구
중재연구
2017 .01
-
｢WTO협정｣ 헌법화에 대한 서론적 고찰 : 분쟁해결에 대한 논의를 중심으로
미국헌법연구
2018 .04
-
WTO 체제 개혁과 한국의 다자통상정책 방향
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0